Skip to main content

Abstract

The conflict between generations is part of contemporary common sense, though it is usually described as a phenomenon of every historical period. Yet there is a sense in which the particularity of youth culture in the 1980s is acknowledged, though usually in negative terms; the aggressiveness, violence, challenge in that sub- or counter-culture is what is generally emphasised, especially in the mass media. The consequent debate centres often around concepts of ‘respect’, ‘discipline’ or ‘order’ — as if ‘today’s youth’ had suffered some corruption, a negative influence which had hitherto been kept at bay. The causes and explanations revert in general to simple psychological categories, or to ill-defined references to the lack of structural restraints in contemporary society, an excess of sexual or personal freedom and an idealisation of the tighter family structures of the past.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes to Section IV

Tofiq

  1. See Statistical Centre of Iran, Population Growth Survey of Iran, Final Report 1973–6, serial no. 777 (June 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Thomas Frejka, The Future of Population Growth (New York: Wiley, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Statistical Centre of Iran, National Census of Population and Housing (Nov. 1976) (based on a 5 per cent sample).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Halbwachs, La mémoire collective (Paris: PUF, 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  5. For a brief account of Mujahidini Khalq, see E. Abrahamian, ‘The guerrilla movement in Iran 1963–77’, in MERIP Reports, no. 86, March/April 1980, pp. 8–12. See also Muzigirihayi Siyasi (Teheran, 1979); and Didqahhayi Mujahidini Khalq dar Bariyi Qanuni Asasi (Teheran, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  6. For a history of the Tudeh party, see S. Zabih, The Communist Movement in Iran (Berkeley, 1966); and for a more recent account,

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fred Halliday, Iran: Dictatorship and Development (New York, 1979) pp. 227–35; also ‘Tudeh’s Kianurion on Embassy takeover: an interview with the first secretary of the Tudeh party’, in MERIP Reports, no. 86, March/April 1980, pp. 24–5.

    Google Scholar 

Ribes

  1. On this subject, see G. Luce, Le temps des corps, rhythmes biologiques et stress social (Paris: Hachette, 1972); and the abundant bibliography of works in English given in

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. Geis, Life Strategies, Human Evolution, Environmental Design (Springer Verlag, 1978).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. These themes are at the heart of the work of H. Laborit, notably in Biologie et structure (Paris: Gallimard, 1968) and

    Google Scholar 

  4. L’homme et la ville (Paris: Gallimard, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See M. White Riley, ‘Age, changement social et pouvoir des Idées’, in Daedalus, special number on ‘Les générations’, no. 4, vol. 7, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  6. On this subject, the best documented study to our knowledge is Simmons, The Role of the Aged in Primitive Society (Yale University Press, 1945).

    Google Scholar 

  7. On inter-generational relations within the family, see L. Roussel, La famille après le mariage des enfants (Paris, 1976); and

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Pitrou, Vivre sans famille (Paris, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cf. R. Lenoir, ‘L’invention du troisieme age’, in Aetes de la recherche en sciences sociales, no. 26–7, March/April 1979, pp. 73–4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See E. R. Schumacher’s comments on the influence of the economic in Small is Beautiful (French trans., Paris, 1978) p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Quoted in A. Gras, Sociologie des ruptures (Paris, 1979) p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Mentre, Les générations sociales (Paris, 1929) p. 452.

    Google Scholar 

  13. I have borrowed the term ‘the logic of living’ from F. Jacob, La logique du vivant (Paris, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Halbwachs, La mémoire collective (Paris, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid, pp. 78–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Duvignaud, Le Don du Rien (Paris, 1977) p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid, p. 300.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Freund, ‘Observations sur deux catégories de la dynamique polomogéne, De la crise au conflict’, in Communications, no. 25, 1976, pp. 107 and 109.

    Google Scholar 

Torregrosa Peris

  1. Peter Berger, ‘Identity as a problem in the sociology of knowledge’ in European Journal of Sociology, vol. VII, 1965, p. 106.

    Google Scholar 

  2. U. Bronfenbrenner, ‘A theoretical perspective for research on human development’, in P. Dreitzel (ed.), Childhood and Socialisation (New York: Macmillan, 1973) pp. 337–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. H. Erikson, ‘Identity and the life cycle’, in Psychological Issues, vol. 1, no. 1, 1959, p. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. H. Erikson, Infancia y sociedad (Childhood and Society) (Paidos, Buenos Aires, 1959) p. 212.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid, p. 212.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Mike Gonzalez Salustiano Campo del Urbano Roberto Mesa

Copyright information

© 1984 The United Nations University

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gonzalez, M., del Urbano, S.C., Mesa, R. (1984). Youth, Sex, Family: The Quest for New Life Units. In: Gonzalez, M., del Urbano, S.C., Mesa, R. (eds) Economy and Society in the Transformation of the World. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07247-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics