Abstract
As we saw in chapter 1, one of the critical characteristics of the free market argument is its hypothesis that the market, if left alone, will generate socially desirable results. This hypothesis is supported by modern economic theorists, who have proven what have been called the Fundamental Theorems of Welfare Economics or the invisible hand theorems, which, in a restricted sense, prove Adam Smith’s assertions to be correct. But exactly what are the advantages of organizing society along free market lines? What is the advantage of leaving individuals alone to barter and trade? One answer would be that this type of economic organization is the only one consistent with individual freedom. Milton Friedman echoes this view in Capitalism and Freedom, where he points out that there has never been a politically free society that did not have a capitalist economic system. Hence, for ideological reasons we should have a vested interest in maintaining our free enterprise system.1 But there is a more fundamental economic reason why society should want its economy organized along the lines of the free market.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See also William Simon, A Time For Truth New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978, for a rather emotional endorsement of this point.
See F. A. Hayek, “Economics and Knowledge,” Economica, 4, 1937, pp. 33–54.
Kenneth Arrow, Individual Choice and Social Value, 2nd ed., New York: Wiley, 1963.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1985 St. Martin’s Press, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schotter, A. (1985). Why Are Free Markets So Good?. In: Free Market Economics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08128-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08128-8_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-08130-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-08128-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)