Skip to main content

Tools of Environmental Policy: Market Instruments versus Command-and-control

  • Chapter
Markets, the State and the Environment

Abstract

Pollution is an inevitable by-product of living. It is of concern where someone uses something and fails to take the costs resulting from that use into account. Normally this is due to the absence of a feedback mechanism to sheet home to producers and consumers the full costs of their decisions. Thus the operator of a steel mill emitting smoke may cause considerable harm in terms of respiratory aggravation, increased cleaning costs and so on. But in the absence of markets, the mill owner has no accurate information on the extent of that harm and certainly has no price incentive to do anything about it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baumol, W.J. and Oates, W.E. (1988) The Theory of Environmental Policy, 2nd edn, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crandell, R.W. (1983) Controlling Industrial Pollution, Brookings, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, M.H. (1985) ‘Building a Better Bubble at EPA’, Regulation March/April, 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1995 Robyn Eckersley and contributors

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moran, A. (1995). Tools of Environmental Policy: Market Instruments versus Command-and-control. In: Eckersley, R. (eds) Markets, the State and the Environment. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14022-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics