Skip to main content

The Importance of Money

  • Chapter
Monetary Theory and Practice

Abstract

The distinguishing characteristic of that set of assets which may be described as money is that they perform the function of a medium of exchange. This definition does not, however, allow for a clear-cut distinction in practice between those assets which should be regarded as money, and those which cannot be so treated. Cash and cheques drawn on banks are the means of payment for transactions which are generally acceptable in most developed economies, and this fact has led many to conclude that cash and demand deposits in banks are the only real monetary assets. There are, however, certain demand deposits, for example compensating balances held with banks in the USA, which cannot be freely used for transactions purposes. On the other hand, possession of a balance on time deposit, or access to overdraft facilities, may allow a purchaser to draw a cheque on his bank account even when he has insufficient demand deposits to meet that cheque. A more fundamental point is that the set of assets which is acceptable as payment for transactions is not immutable over time; it has changed in the past and could do so again in the future. If people should find it economically advantageous to accept, and to proffer, other financial claims in payment for transactions, then the set of assets which is to be described as money will alter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References for Appendix 1

  1. Andersen, L.C. and Jordan, J.L., ‘Monetary and fiscal actions: a test of their relative importance in economic stabilisation’, Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Monthly Review, November 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ando, Albert and Modigliani, Franco, ‘The relative stability of monetary velocity and the investment multiplier’, American Economic Review, September 1965, pp. 693–728. See also other papers on the subject in the same issue.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Artis, M. J. and Nobay, A. R., ‘Two aspects of the monetary debate’, National Institute Economic Review, August 1969, pp. 33–51.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bank of England, Appendix 2 (pp. 55–63 of this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barrett, C. K. and Walters, A. A., ‘The stability of Keynesian and monetary multipliers in the United Kingdom’, Review of Economics and Statistics, November 1966, pp. 395–405.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bronfenbrenner, Martin and Mayer, Thomas, ‘Liquidity functions in the American economy’, Econometrica, October 1980, pp. 810–34.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brunner, Karl and Meltzer, A. H., ‘Some further investigations of demand and supply functions for money’, Journal of Finance, May 1964, pp. 240–83.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burstein, M. L., Economic Theory: Equilibrium and Change, Wiley, London, 1968, esp. pp. 289–326.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chow, G. C., ‘On the long-run and short-run demand for money’, Journal of Political Economy, April 1966, pp. 111–31.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Christ, C. F., ‘Interest rates and “portfolio selection” among liquid assets in the US’, Studies in Memory of Yehuda Grunfeld, Stanford University Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Courchene, T. J. and Shapiro, H. T., ‘The demand for money: a note from the time series’, Journal of Political Economy, October 1964, pp. 498–503.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Davis, R. G., ‘How much does money matter?’, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Monthly Review, June 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fisher, Douglas, ‘The demand for money in Britain: quarterly results 1951–67’, Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, December 1968, pp. 329–44.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Frazer, W. J., ‘The demand for money, statistical results and monetary policy’, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, March 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Friedman, Milton, ‘The quantity theory of money: a restatement’, Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money, ed. M. Friedman, University of Chicago Press; 1956, pp. 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Friedman, Milton, ‘The demand for money: some theoretical and empirical results’, Journal of Political Economy, August 1959, pp. 327–51.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Friedman, Milton, ‘The demand for money: some theoretical and empirical results’, Journal of Political Economy, August 1959, p. 347.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Friedman, Milton and Meiselman, David, ‘The relative stability of monetary velocity and the investment multiplier in the United States, 1897–1958’, in Stabilization Policies, CMC Research Papers, Prentice-Hall, 1964, pp. 165–268.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Friedman, Milton and Schwartz, A. J., A Monetary History of the United States 1867–1960, Princeton University Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goldberger, A. S., Econometric Theory, Wiley, New York, 1966, pp. 197–200.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hamburger, M. J., ‘The demand for money by households, money substitutes, and monetary policy’, Journal of Political Economy, December 1966, pp. 600–23.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Heller, H. R., ‘The demand for money: the evidence from the short-run data’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, May 1965, pp. 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson, H. G., ‘Recent developments in monetary theory: a commentary’, in Money in Britain, eds. D. R. Croome and H. G. Johnson, Oxford University Press, 1970, pp. 83–114.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kavanagh, N. J. and Walters, A. A., ‘Demand for money in the UK 1877–1961: some preliminary findings’, Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Economics and Statistics, May 1966, pp. 93–116.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Laidler, David, ‘The rate of interest and the demand for money-some empirical evidence’, Journal of Political Economy, December 1966, pp. 543–55.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Laidler, David and Parkin, Michael, ‘The demand for money in the United Kingdom 1956–67: preliminary estimates’, University of Essex Discussion Paper, unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Latané, H. A., ‘Cash balances and the interest rate: a pragmatic approach’, Review of Economics and Statistics, November 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Latané, H. A., ‘Income velocity and interest rates: a pragmatic approach’, Review of Economics and Statistics, November 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lee, T. H., ‘Alternative interest rates and the demand for money: the empirical evidence’, American Economic Review, December 1967, pp. 1168–81.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Leeuw, Frank de and Kalchbrenner, John, ‘Monetary and fiscal actions: a test of their relative importance in economic stabilisation—comment’, Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Monthly Review, April 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Meltzer, A. H., ‘The demand for money: the evidence from time series’, Journal of Political Economy, June 1963, pp. 219–46.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Motley, Brian, ‘A demand-for-money function for the household sector-some preliminary findings’, Journal of Finance, December 1967, pp. 405–18.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Radcliffe Report, Report of the Committee on the Working of the Monetary System, Cmnd 827, August 1959, para. 392.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Teigen, R. L., ‘Demand and supply functions for money in the United States: some structural estimates’, Econometrica, October 1964, pp. 476–509.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tobin, James, ‘The monetary interpretation of history’, American Economic Review, June 1965, pp. 464–85.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1984 C. A. E. Goodhart

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goodhart, C.A.E. (1984). The Importance of Money. In: Monetary Theory and Practice. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17295-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics