Skip to main content

Economy, Democracy and Bureaucracy

  • Chapter
Economy and Democracy

Part of the book series: British Association for the Advancement of Science ((BAAS))

Abstract

Public sector bureaucracy is regarded by many to be a major social problem. It is often regarded in pejorative terms to represent inefficiency, wastefulness, a haven of privilege, and a threat to the ideals of a democratic society. The growth of bureaucracy is viewed with suspicion; stimulates much political debate and generally receives a bad press. Bureaucracy is the object of ridicule; the subject of investigative journalism; and forms the subject matter of polemical tracts on the future direction of society. The growth of bureaucracy has brought forth charges of unrepresentativeness and demands for a reduction in the size of government. Even those sympathetic to the ideals of government have criticised bureaucracy for failing to carry out legislative intent and for being insensitive to the needs of the average citizen.

The phenomenon of abdication to bureaucratic directives in corporations, in trades unions, in parties and in cooperatives is so widespread that it indicates a fundamental weakness of democracy. (Selznick, 1949, p. 9)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahlbrandt, R. S. ‘Efficiency in the Provision of Fire Services’, Public Choices, vol. 19 (1973), pp. 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Allesi, L. ‘An Economic Analysis of Government Ownership and Regulation: Theory and Evidence from the Electric Power Industry’, Public Choice, vol. 19 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. Social Choice and Individual Values (Chichester: John Wiley, 1951 (second edition 1963)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B. and Stiglitz, J. E. Lectures on Public Economics (Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon R. and Eltis, W. A. Britain’s Economic Problem: Too Few Producers? (London: Macmillan, 1976 (2nd edition 1978)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. Business Behaviour Value and Growth (London: Macmillan, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. The Coming of Post Industrial Society (New York: Basic Books, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendix, R. ‘Bureaucracy: The Problem and Its Setting’, American Sociological Review, vol. 12 (1947) October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendix, R. ‘Bureaucratization in Industry’ in Kornhauser, Dubin and Ross (eds), Industrial Conflict (New York, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottomore, T. B. Elites and Society (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, A. and Wintrobe, R. ‘The Equilibrium Size of a Budget Maximising Bureau: A Note on Niskanen’s Theory of Bureaucracy’, JPE, vol. 82 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, A. and Wintrobe, R. Bureaucratic Conduct (Cambridge University Press, 1982).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. V. and Jackson, P. M. Public Sector Economics (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1978) (second edition 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. Ruling Class, Ruling Culture (Cambridge University Press, 1977).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M. The Bureaucratic Phenomenon (Chicago University Press, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. Who Governs? (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Djilas, M. The New Class. An Analysis of the Communist System (New York: Praeger, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper and Row, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. Inside Bureaucracy (Boston, Mass: Little Brown, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. Concept of the Corporation (New York, 1946).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. Essays in Positive Economics (Chicago University Press, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, D., Kiesling, H., and Muller, T. Private Provision of Public Services (Washington DC: Urban Institute, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M. and Noll, R. G. ‘Voters, bureaucrats and legislators: a rational choice perspective on the growth of bureaucracy’, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 9 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. The New Industrial State (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. ‘Metaphysical Pathos and the Theory of Bureaucracy’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadjimatheou, G. and Skouras, A. ‘Britain’s Economic Problem: The Growth of the Non-Market Sector’, Economic Journal, vol. 48 (1979) June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. ‘The Present State of the Debate’, in Hayek (ed.) Collectivist Economic Planning (London: Macmillan, 1935).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. Individualism and Economic Order (Chicago University Press, 1948).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. Constitution of Liberty (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heclo H. and Wildaysky A., The Private Government of Public Money (London: Macmillan, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, J. D. The Economics of Organisation (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoenack, S. A. Economic Behaviour Within Organisations (Cambrige University Press, 1983).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horvat, B. The Yugoslav Economic System (International Arts and Science, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntingdon, S. P. ‘Post Industrial Politics, How Benign will it be?’, Comparative Politics (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntingdon, S. P. ‘The Democratic Distemper’, Public Interest (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. J. The Political Economy of Bureaucracy (Oxford: Philip Allan, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. M. ‘Fiscal Crisis and Democracy’, in R. L. Borthwick and J. E. Spence (eds), British Politics in Perspective (Leicester University Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. M. ‘Monetarism and Implementation: Two Primers’, in P. M. Jackson (ed.) The Implementation of a Philosophy: Conservative Government Policies 1979–83 (1985 (forthcoming)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, M. Social Control of the Welfare State (University of Chicago Press, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. W. and Stewart, J. D. The Case for Local Government (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristol, I. Two Cheers for Capitalism (New York: Basic Books, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, O. ‘On the Economic Theory of Socialism’, in B. E. Lippincott (ed.), On the Economic Theory of Socialism (Minneapolis, 1938).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. ‘Allocative Efficiency vs X-efficiency’, American Economic Review, vol. 56 (1966) June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. ‘Competition and X-efficiency: reply’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 81 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. ‘Aspects of the X-efficiency Theory of the Firm’, The Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 6, no. 2 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. Beyond Economic Man (Harvard University Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. ‘On the Basic Proposition of X-efficiency Theory’, American Economic Review (1978) May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. ‘A Branch of Economics is Missing: Micro—Micro Theory’, Journal of Economic Literature, June (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. ‘Note on X-efficiency and Bureaucracy’, in R. C. O. Matthews and G. B. Stafford (eds), The Grants Economy and Collective Consumption (London: Macmillan, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlup, F. ‘Theories of the firm: Marginalist; Behavioural Managerial’, American Economic Review, vol. 57 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Migue, J. L. and Belanger, G. ‘Towards a Theory of Managerial Discretion’, Public Choice, vol. 17 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. J. ‘Bureaucratic compliance as a game on the unit square’, Public Choice, vol. 29 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, J. ‘The Optimal Structure of Incentives and Authority Within an Organisation’, Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 7 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. A. ‘The Peculiar Economics of Bureaucracy’, American Economic Review, vol. 63 (1968) May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. Bureaucracy and Representative Government (Chicago: Aldine, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. E. Fiscal Federalism (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, M. ‘Bureaucracy, Monopoly and the Demand for Municipal Services’, Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 8 (1980) November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. The Social System (Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. Complex Organisations: A Critical Essay, 2nd Edition (Glenview, Illinois: Scott Foresman, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. The External Control of Organisations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (New York: Harper Row, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pliatsky, L. ‘The Rise and Fall of Public Expenditure Planning: An Essay on the British System of Public Expenditure. Planning and Control’ in R. C. O. Matthews and G. B. Stafford, The Grants Economy and Collective Consumption (London: Macmillan, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Radner, R. ‘Monitoring Cooperative Agreements in a Repeated Principal—Agent Relationship’ Econometrica, vol. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, M. Macroeconomics in Question (Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. TVA and the Grass Roots (University of California Press, 1949).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. Collective Choice and Social Welfare (Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sik, O. Czechoslovakia: The Bureaucratic Economy (International Arts and Science, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. Administrative Behaviour: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administration Organisation (2nd edition 1965) (Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press, 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, B. ‘Outside Information and the Degree of Monopoly Power of a Public Bureau’, Southern Economic Journal, vol. 47 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. ‘Incentives, Risk and Information: Towards a Theory of Hierarchy’, Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 6 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. D. ‘The Role of Information in Public Accountability’, in Issues in Public Sector Accounting (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. A. Review of W. A. Niskanen’s, ‘Bureaucracy and Representative Government’ — Journal of Economic Literature, September (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C. M. ‘A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. The Politics of Bureaucracy (Washington DC: Public Affairs Press, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Mises, L. Bureaucracy (Yale University Press, 1944).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. L. ‘Critique of Elitist Theory of Democracy’ in C. A. MacCoy and J. Playfords (eds), Apolitical Politics (New York: Thomas Y. Cromwell, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. The Theory of Social and Economic Organisation (trans. A. M. Henderson and T. Parsons) (New York, 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavasky, A. The Politics of the Budgetary Process (Boston, Mass: Little Brown, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildaysky, A. ‘The Political Economy of Efficiency: CBA’, Public Administration Review, vol. 29, no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. The Economics of Discretionary Behaviour (Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

R. C. O. Matthews

Copyright information

© 1985 The British Association for the Advancement of Science

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jackson, P. (1985). Economy, Democracy and Bureaucracy. In: Matthews, R.C.O. (eds) Economy and Democracy. British Association for the Advancement of Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17970-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics