Skip to main content

Strategic Reallocation of Endowments

  • Chapter
Game Theory

Part of the book series: The New Palgrave

  • 667 Accesses

Abstract

In the framework of pure exchange economies it might well happen that economic agents will find it advantageous to change their endowment holdings and by this increase their utility. Such an increase is achieved by acting competitively with the new endowments and comparing the new equilibrium allocation with the one that would have been achieved without the change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Aumann, R. and Peleg, B. 1974. A note on Gale’s example. Journal of Mathematical Economics 1, 209–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J.N. 1958. Immiserizing growth: a geometrical note. Review of Economic Studies 25, June, 201–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabszewicz, J.J. and Drize, J.H. 1971. Syndicates of traders in an economy. In Differential Games and Related Topics, ed. H.W. Kuhn and G. Szego, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, D. 1974. Exchange equilibrium and coalitions: an example. Journal of Mathematical Economics 1, 63–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guesnerie, R. and Laffont, J.J. 1978. Advantageous reallocation of initial resources. Econometrica 46(4), July, 835–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatta, T. 1983. Immiserizing growth in a many commodity setting. Working Paper, The Johns Hopkins University, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W. 1936. Note on the pure theory of capital transfer. In Explorations in Economics Taussig Festschrift, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantel, R. 1982. Substitutability and the welfare effects of endowment increases. Paper presented at the Econometric Society Meeting in Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Collel, A. 1976. En torno a una propiedad poco atractiva del equilibrio competitivo. Moneda y Credito [Madrid], no. 136, 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polterovich, V.M. and Spivak, V.A. 1983. Gross substitutability of point-to-set correspondences. Journal of Mathematical Economics 11(2), April, 117–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postlewaite, A. 1979. Manipulation via endowments. Review of Economic Studies 46(2), April, 255–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safra, Z. 1983. Manipulation by reallocating initial endowments. Journal of Mathematical Economics 12(1), September, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safra, Z. 1985. Existence of equilibrium for Wairasian endowment games. Journal of Economic Theory 37(2), December, 366–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, W. 1979. The equilibrium allocations of Walras and Lindahl manipulation games. Discussion Paper, University of Minnesota, Center of Economic Research, No. 111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

John Eatwell Murray Milgate Peter Newman

Copyright information

© 1989 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Safra, Z. (1989). Strategic Reallocation of Endowments. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (eds) Game Theory. The New Palgrave. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20181-5_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics