Skip to main content

Coriolanus and monarchy

  • Chapter
Coriolanus

Part of the book series: The Critics Debate ((TCD))

  • 15 Accesses

Abstract

There is an important issue involved in Coriolanus’ claim that government cannot be mixed and that someone must rule. English monarchy had traditionally been understood on the model of the king’s two bodies. The king is more than a person. The king or queen rules in and only with the approval of Parliament. The Stuarts, however, had a continental notion of kingship and claimed a divine right to rule. Indeed they often ruled without Parliament, which they avoided calling. Kingship was looked upon by the Stuarts as an inheritance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Authors

Copyright information

© 1989 Bruce King

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

King, B. (1989). Coriolanus and monarchy. In: Coriolanus. The Critics Debate. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20207-2_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics