Skip to main content

If Logic, Game-Theoretical Semantics, and the Philosophy of Science

  • Chapter
Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science

Part of the book series: Logic, Epistemology, And The Unity Of Science ((LEUS,volume 1))

Abstract

IF (independence-friendly) logic is about informational independence that may take place between any components that admit of an interpretation in terms of game-theoretical semantics. These two approaches are seen to provide integrative tools and methods across individual sciences, including strategic meaning in linguistics, concurrency in computation, knowledge in multi-agent systems, and quantum information. An overarching theme is to get less-than-hyper-rational, decentralised decision makers to agree on the truth of statements codifying central structural features of these individual sciences. One upshot is that semantic games call for a re-examination of some basic assumptions in game theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abramsky, Samson and Radha Jagadeesan: 1994, ‘Games and Full Completeness for Multiplicative Linear Logic’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 59, 543–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Alfaro, Luca and Tom A. Henzinger: 2000, ‘Concurrent Omega-regular Games’, in Proceedings of the 15th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Alfaro, Luca, Tom A. Henzinger and F. Y. C. Mang: 2000, ‘The Control of Synchronous Systems’, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Concurrency Theory, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1877, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, pp. 458–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, Robert: 1987, ‘Correlated Equilibrium as an Expression of Bayesian Rationality’, Econo-metrica 55, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, Robert: 1992, ‘Perspectives on Bounded Rationality’, in Yoram Moses, (ed.), Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge, Monterey, CA,Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 108–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, Michael: 2001, ‘Superagency: Beyond an Individualistic Theory of Games’, in J. van Benthem (ed.), Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, San Francisco, Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, Michael, L.-A. Gérard-Varet, P. Mongin and H. S. Shin (eds.): 1997, Epistemic Logic and the Theory of Games and Decisions, Dordrecht, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, Giacomo: 1992, ‘Rational Belief in Extensive Games’, Theory and Decision 33, 153–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradfield, Julian: 2001, ‘Independence: Logic and Concurrency’, in P. G. Clote and H. Schwichten-berg (eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Computer Science Logic, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1862, Berlin, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chassin de Kergommeaux, J. and P. Codognet: 1994, ‘Parallel Logic Programming Systems’, ACM Computing Surveys 26, 295–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleaveland, R. and S. A. Smolka: 1996, ‘Strategic Directions in Concurrency Research’, in ACM Computing Surveys 28, 607–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, David, A. Ekert and R. Lupacchini: 2000, ‘Machines, Logic and Quantum Physics’,Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6, 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, George: 1993, Multiple-Valued Logic Design, Bristol, Institute of Physics Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagin, R., J. Y. Halpern, Y. Moses and M. Y. Vardi: 1995, Reasoning about Knowledge, Cambridge,MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, B. Roy and B. H. Soffer: 1995, ‘Lagrangians of Physics and the Game of Fisher-information Transfer’, Physical Review E 52, 2274–2286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, Anthony: 1984, The Logi of Aspect, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, Lawrence: 1989, ‘Wittgenstein and Paraconsistency’, in G. Priest, F. R. Routley and J.Norman (eds.), Paraconsistent Logic. Essays on the Inconsistent, Munich, Philosophia Verlag,pp. 540–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene: 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko: 1973, Logic, Language Games and Information, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko: 1987, ‘Language Understanding and Strategic Meaning’, Synthese 73, 497–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko: 1996, The Principles of Mathematics Revisited, New York, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko: 2002, ‘Hyperclassical Logic (aka IF Logic) and its Implications for Logical Theory’, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8, 404–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko and Merril B. Hintikka: 1986, Investigating Wittgenstein, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko and Jack Kulas: 1985,Anaphora and Definite Descriptions, Dordrecht, D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko and Gabriel Sandu: 1995, ‘What is the Logic of Parallel Processing?’, International Journal of the Foundations of Computer Science 6, 27–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko and Gabriel Sandu: 1997, ‘Game-theoretical Semantics’, in J. van Benthem, and A.ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language, Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp. 361–410

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, Y. C. and K. C. Chu: 1972, ‘Team Decision Theory and Information Structures in Optimal Control Problems I’, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 17, 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, Y. C. and F. K. Sun: 1974, ‘Value of Information in Two-team Zero-sum Problems’, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 14, 557–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulstijn, Joris: 2000, Dialogue Models for Inquiry and Transaction, Dissertation, University of Tw e nt e.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humberstone, Lloyd: 1979, ‘Interval Semantics for Tense Logic: Some Remarks’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 171–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janasik, Tapio and Gabriel Sandu: 2003, ‘Dynamic Game Semantics’, in J. Peregrin (ed.), Meaning:The Dynamic Turn, Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 215–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janasik, Tapio, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen and Gabriel Sandu: 2003, ‘Anaphora and Extensive Games ’,in M. Andronis et al. (eds), Papers from the 38th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society,Chicago, Chicago Linguistic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. H. and F. W. Roush: 1987, Team Theory, New York, Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koller, Daphne and N. Megiddo: 1992, ‘The Complexity of Two-person Zero-sum Games in Extensive Form ’, Games and Economic Behavior 4, 528 –552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krynicki, Michail: 1993, ‘Hierarchies of Partially Ordered Connectives and Quantifiers ’, Mathematical Logic Quarterly 39, 287 –294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langholm, Tore: 1988, Partiality, Truth and Persistence, Stanford, CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, F. and Y. Shoham: 1989, ‘Argument Systems — A Uniform Basis for Non-monotonic Reasoning ’,in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 245 –255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, Barton L.: 1995, ‘Information Processing and Bounded Rationality: A Survey ’, Canadian Journal of Economics, Revue canadienne d ';Economique 28, 42 –67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, Norman: 1958, Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Memoir, London, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschak, J., and R. Radner: 1972, Economic Theory of Teams, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, John and G. Price: 1973, ‘The Logic of Animal Conflict ’, Nature 246, 15 –18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavicić, Mladen and Norman D. Megill: 1999, ‘Non-orthomodular Models for Both Standard Quantum Logic and Standard Classical Logic: Repercussions for Quantum Computers ’,Helvetical Physica Acta 72, 189 –210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Charles S.: 1902, ‘Vague ’, in J. M. Baldwin (ed.), Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology,New York, MacMillan, p. 748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Charles S.: 1931 –1966, in Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss, and A. W. Burks (eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8 Vols., Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccione, Michael and Ariel Rubinstein: 1997, ‘On the Interpretation of Decision Problems with Imperfect Recall ’, Games and Economic Behavior 20, 3 –24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko: 2000, ‘Logic and Coherence in the Light of Competitive Games ’, Logique et Analyse 171 –172, 371 –391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko: 2001a, ‘Intentional Identity Revisited ’, Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 6, 144 –188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko: 2001b, ‘Most Even Budged Yet: Some Cases for Game-theoretic Semantics in Natural Language ’, Theoretical Linguistics 27, 20 –54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko: 2001c, ‘Varieties of IFing ’, in M. Pauly and G. Sandu (eds.), Proceedings of the ESSLLI 2001 Workshop on Logic and Games, University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko: 2002a, ‘Quantum Logic and Quantum Theory in a Game-theoretic Perspective ’, Open Systems &.Information Dynamics 9, 273 –290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko: 2002b, ‘Knowledge Constructions for Artificial Intelligence ’, in M.-S.Hacid, Z. W. Ras, D. A. Zighed and Y. Kodratoff (eds.), Foundations of Intelligent Systems,Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 2366, Springer, pp. 303 –311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko: 2003a, ‘Peirce 's Game-theoretic Ideas in Logic ’, Semiotica 144, 33 –47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko: 2003b, ‘Logic, Language Games and Ludics ’, to appear in Acta Informatica 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko: 2004a, ‘Semantic Games in Logic and Epistemology ’, this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko: 2004b, ‘Multi-agent systems and Game Theory — A Peircean Manifesto ’,International Journal of General Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko and Gabriel Sandu: 1999, ‘Games in Philosophical Logic ’, Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 4, 143 –173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, Ariel: 1998, Modeling Bounded Rationality, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandu, Gabriel and Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen: 2001, ‘Partiality and Games: Propositional Logic ’, Logic Journal of the IGPL 9, 107 –127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, Leonard J.: 1954, The Foundations of Statistics, New York, Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Stenger, B. and Daphne Koller: 1997, ‘Team-maxmin Equilibria ’, Games and Economic Behavior 21, 309 –321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanian, V. S. et al.: 2000, Heterogeneous Agent Systems, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witsenhausen, H. S.: 1968, ‘A Counterexample in Stochastic Optimum Control ’, Siam Journal of Control 6, 131 –147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig: 1953, Philosophical Investigations, (third edition 1967), Oxford, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig: 1978, Philosophical Grammar, Columbia, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig: 2000, Wittgenstein 's Nachlass, The Bergen Electronic Edition, The Wittgenstein Trustees, The University of Bergen, Oxford University Press. (The transcription used is the diplomatic transcription.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pietarinen, AV., Sandu, G. (2009). If Logic, Game-Theoretical Semantics, and the Philosophy of Science. In: Rahman, S., Symons, J., Gabbay, D.M., Bendegem, J.P.v. (eds) Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science. Logic, Epistemology, And The Unity Of Science, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2808-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2808-3_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2486-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2808-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics