This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
M. Alvesson, “Beyond Neopositivists, Romantics, and Localists: A Reflexive Approach to Interviews in Organizational Research”, Academy of Management Review, 2003, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 13–33.
A. Barnes and P. Thagard, Empathy and analogy, {http://cogsci.uwaterloo.ca/Articles/Pages/ Empathy.html}; 1997.
G.T. Barrett-Lennard, “The Empathy Cycle: Refinement of a Nuclear Concept”, Journal of Counseling Psychology 28, 91–100.
M.F. Basch, “Empathic Understanding: A Review of the Concept and Some Theoretical Considerations”, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 31, 101–126.
H. Blumer, Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1969).
A.C. Bohart and L.S. Greenberg, (eds.), Empathy Reconsidered. New Directions in Psychotherapy (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1997).
J.D. Bozarth, “Empathy from the Framework of Client-Centered Theory and the Rogerian Hypothesis”, in A.C. Bohart and L.S. Greenberg (eds.), Empathy Reconsidered, (Washington, D.C.: APA, 1997), pp. 81–102.
D. Bru, “Empathie: meer dan een houding”, Journal for Humanistics, 2001, 2, 5, pp. 50–57.
Ch.H. Cooley, “The Roots of Social Knowledge”, The American Journal of Sociology, 1926, 32, pp. 59–79.
R.G. Collingwood, The idea of History (Oxford: Clarendon, 1946).
W. Dilthey, Selected Writings (edited and translated by H.P. Rickman; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976).
J. Duyndam, “Is medeleven goed?” Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte, 2001, 93, 1, pp. 16–28.
J. Duyndam, “Empowerment by Empathy. On Good and Gruesome Empathy”, in A. Halsema & D. van Houten (eds.), Empowering Humanity. State of the art in humanistics (Utrecht: De Tijdstroom, 2002), pp. 139–148.
N. Eisenberg and J. Strayer, “Critical Issues in the Study of Empathy”, in N. Eisenberg and J. Strayer (eds.), Empathy and Its Development (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 3–13.
B. Fay, Contemporary Philosophy of Social Science (Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1996).
H.-G. Gadamer, Truth and Method (London: Sheed and Ward, 1975). (Originally in German: Wahrheit und Methode, Tübingen, 1960.)
H.-G. Gadamer, “On the Circle of Understanding”, in John M. Connolly and Thomas Keutner (eds.) Hermeneutics versus Science? (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988), pp. 68–78.
E.T. Gendlin, “The experiential response”, in E. Hammer (ed.) The Use of Interpretation in Treatment, (New York: Grune & Stratton, 1968), pp. 208–227.
A. Giddens, New Rules of Sociological Method (London: Hutchinson, 1976).
G.A. Gladstein, “The Role of Empathy in Counseling: Theoretical Considerations”, in G.A. Gladstein and Ass., Empathy and Counseling, explorations in Theory and Research. New York: Springer.
R.L. Gorden, Interviewing: Strategy, Techniques, and Tactics (Homewood, Illinois: The Dorsey Press, 1980).
C.G. Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science (New York: The Free Press, 1965).
M.L. Hoffman, “Development of Prosocial Motivation: Empathy and Guilt,” in N. Heisenberg (ed.), The Development of Prosocial Behavior (New York, 1982), pp. 218–231.
K.J. Holyoak and P. Thagard, Mental Leaps (Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press, 1995).
R. Van den Hoofdakker, “Empathie”, Journal for Humanistics, 2001, 2, 5, pp. 7–15.
E. Hoogeveen, Eenvoud en strategie. De praktijk van humanistisch geestelijk werk (Amersfoort/Leuven: Acco, 1991).
E. Husserl, Cartesianische Mediationen und Pariser Vorträge (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1950).
E. Husserl, Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1952). (First English edition in 1931; first German edition in 1913).
T. Jorna, (ed.), Door eenvoud verbonden. Over de theorie en de praktijk van het humanistisch geestelijk raadswerk (Utrecht: Kwadraat, 1997).
R. Josselson, “Imagining the Real. Empathy, Narrative, and the Dialogic Self,” in R. Josselson & A. Lieblich (eds.) Interpreting Experience: The Narrative Study of Lives (London: Sage, 1995), pp. 27–42.
H. Kohut, “Introspection, Empathy, and Psychoanalysis: An Examination of the Relationship Between Mode of Observation and Theory”, in P. H. Ornstein (ed.) The Search for the Self (New York: International Universities Press, 1959), Vol. 1, pp. 205–232.
H. Kohut, “On empathy,” in P. H. Ornstein (ed.), The Search for the Self (New York: International Universities Press, 1981), Vol.4, pp. 525–535.
H. Kohut, How Does Analysis Cure? (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1984).
H.H. Kögler, “Empathy, Dialogical Self, and Reflexive Interpretation: The Symbolic Source of Simulation,” in H.H. Kögler & K.R. Stueber (eds.), Empathy and agency, (Oxford, UK: Westview Press, 2000), pp. 194–221.
H.H. Kögler and K.R. Stueber, (eds.), Empathy and Agency. The Problem of Understanding in the Human Sciences (Boulder, Colorado, US.; Oxford, UK: Westview Press, 2000).
S. Kvale, InterViews. An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing (Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1996).
R.H. Lauer and W.H. Handel, Social Psychology: The Theory and Application of Symbolic Interaction (Boston: Houghron Mifflin, 1977/1983).
D.S. MacIsaac, “Empathy: Heinz Kohut’s Contribution,” in A.C. Bohart & L.S. Greenberg (eds.) Empathy Reconsidered (Washington, DC: APA, 1997), pp. 245–264.
A.R. Mackor, “Rechtvaardigheid, barmhartigheid en empathie”, Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte, 2001, 93, 1, pp. 29–45.
J. Marcia, “Empathy and Psychotherapy,” in N. Eisenberg and J. Strayer (eds.) Empathy and its Development (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 81–102.
G.H. Mead, Mind, Self, and Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934).
M. Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1962). (First French edition in 1945.)
M. Merleau-Ponty, The Visible and the Invisible (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1968). (First French edition in 1964.)
J.H.M. Mooren, “Emoties,” in J.J.A. Doolaard (ed.), Handboek geestelijke verzorging in zorginstellingen, (Kampen: Kok, 1996), pp. 857–866.
E. Nagel, The Structure of Science. Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1961).
Th. Nickles, (ed.), Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality (Dordrecht/Boston: Reidel, 1980).
K.R. Popper, Objective Knowledge (Oxford: At the Clarendon Press, 1972).
K.R. Popper and J.C. Eccles, The Self and its Brain. An argument for Interactionism (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983).
H. De Preester “Epistemological Questions Concerning the In-Depth Body and the Coming About of the Ego” (in this volume 2006).
T. Reik, Listening with the Third Ear (New York: Farrar-Strauss, 1949).
P. Ricoeur, Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).
C.R. Rogers, Client-Centered Therapy Its Current Practice, Implications and Theory (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1951).
C.R. Rogers, On Becoming a Person. A Therapist’s View of Psychotherapy (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1961).
C.R. Rogers, “The Interpersonal Relationship: The Core of Guidance,” in C.R. Rogers and B. Stevens (eds.), Person to Person. The Problem of Being Human (New York: Pocket Books, 1967), pp. 85–101.
H.J. Rubin and I.S. Rubin, Qualitative Interviewing. The Art of Hearing Data (Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1995).
R.S. Rudner, Philosophy of Social Science (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1966).
A. Ryan, The Philosophy of the Social Sciences (London: Macmillan, 1970).
A. Schutz, Collected Papers I, ed. M. Natanson (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1962).
A. Schutz, Collected Papers II, ed. A. Brodersen (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1964).
F. Schleiermacher, Hermeneutik (edited by H. Kimmerle; Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1959).
C. Seale, “Qualitative interviewing”, in C. Seale (ed.), Researching Society and Culture (London: Sage, 1998, pp. 202–216).
D. Silverman, “The Impossible Dreams of Reformism and Romanticism”, in J.F. Gubrium & D. Silverman (eds.), The Politics of Field Research. Sociology Beyond Enlightenment (London: Sage, 1989), pp. 30–48.
A. Smaling, “Objectiviteit en rolneming”, in I. Maso & A. Smaling (eds.), Objectiviteit in kwalitatief onderzoek, ed. (Meppel, Amsterdam: Boom, 1990), pp. 30–49.
A. Smaling, “Qualitative Interviewing: Contextualization and Empowerment,” in I. Maso and F. Wester (eds.), The Deliberate Dialogue, (Brussels: VUBpress, 1996), pp. 15–28.
A. Smaling, “Dialogical Partnership – The Relationship Between the Researcher and the Researched in Action Research.,” in B. Boog, H. Coenen, L. Keune and R. Lammerts (eds.), The Complexity of Relationships in Action Research (Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, 1998), pp. 1–15.
A. Smaling and I. Maso, “The Humanist Potentialities of Qualitative Research: Inner Growth, Dialogical Relationships, Empowerment and Normative Professionalism,” in A. Halsema & D. van Houten (eds.), Empowering Humanity. State of the Art in Humanistics (Utrecht: De Tijdstroom, 2002), pp. 37–60.
E. Stein, On the Problem of Empathy (Washington, D.C: ICS Publications (Kluwer), 1989; third revised edition; first English edition in 1962; first German edition in 1917).
S. Strasser, The Idea of Dialogal Phenomenology (Pittsburgh, Pa.: Duquesne University Press, 1969).
P.M. Van Strien, Empathie. Een kwaliteitsaspect van de psychoanalytische praktijk? (Amsterdam: Thela-Thesis, 1999).
K.R. Stueber, “Understanding Other Minds and the Problem of Rationality”, in H.H.Kögler and Stueber, K.R. (eds.), Empathy and Agency (Oxford, UK: Westview Press, 2000), pp. 144–162.
W. Van Tilburg, “Condities voor empathie”, Journal for Humanistics, 2001, 2, 5, pp. 24–31.
G. Vielmetter, “Simulation and the Explanation of Action”, in H.H. Kögler and K.R. Stueber (eds.), Empathy and Agency (Oxford, UK: Westview Press, 2000), pp. 83–102.
M. Weber, The Methodology of the Social Sciences (New York: Free Press, 1949).
M. Weber, “The Interpretive Understanding of Social Action,” in M. Brodbech (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences (New York: MacMillan, 1968), pp. 20–33.
G.A.M. Widdershoven, “Hermeneutiek en client-centered psychotherapie”, in A.W.M. Mooij and G.A.M. Widdershoven (eds.), Hermeneutiek en psychologie. Interpretatie in theorievorming, onderzoek en psychotherapie (Meppel/Amsterdam: Boom, 1992), pp. 74–98.
P. Winch, The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smaling, A. (2007). The Meaning of Empathic Understanding in Human Inquiry. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) Phenomenology of Life from the Animal Soul to the Human Mind. Analecta Husserliana, vol 94. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5182-1_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5182-1_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5181-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5182-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)