Skip to main content

Using Discrete Choice Modelling to Investigate Breast Screening Participation

  • Chapter
Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care

Part of the book series: The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources ((ENGO,volume 11))

The aim of this chapter is to show how discrete choice experiments (DCEs) can be applied to examine the preferences of women reinvited for breast screening and to use the results in developing breast screening participation enhancement strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baines, C.J., To, T. and Wall, C. 1990. Women’s attitudes to screening after participation in the National Breast Screening Study. A questionnaire survey. Cancer, vol 65, 1663–1669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, D.A., Lightfoot, N.E., Steggles, S. and Jackson, C. 1998. The experience and satisfaction of women attending breast cancer screening. Oncology Nursing Forum, vol 25, 115–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S. 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and application to travel demand. Cambridge, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bech, M. and Gyrd-Hansen, D. 2005. Effects coding in discrete choice experiments. Health Economics, vol 14, 1079–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, J. and White, V. 1994. Review of Australian research into behavioural aspects of screening mammography. Centre for Behavioural Research into Cancer, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, J., Redman, S., Hill, D. and Henry, E. 1995. Public understanding of medical screening. Journal of Medical Screening, vol 2, 224–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, J., Schofield, P., White, V., Hill, D. and Russell, I. 1997a. Predictors of returning for second round screening at a population based mammographic screening programme in Melbourne, Australia. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol 51, 62–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, J., Sutherland, M., Cappiello, M. and Hevern, M. 1997b. Predictors of attendance at a relocatable mammography service for rural women. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, vol 21, 739–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health (CDHS&H). 1994. National Accreditation Requirements, National Program for the Early Detection Breast Cancer. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, M., McNoe, B., Smith, T., Bandaranayake, M. and Doyle, T.C. 1998. Once is enough–why some women do not continue to participate in a breast cancer screening programme, New Zealand Medical Journal, 111:1066, 180–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerard, K., Shanahan, M. and Louviere, J. 2003. Using Stated Preference Discrete Choice Modelling to inform health care decision-making: a pilot study of breast screening participation. Applied Economics, vol 35, 1073–1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. 1999. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D., Rose, J. and Greene, W.H. 2005. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton Taylor, D., McPherson, K., Parbhoo, S. and Perry, N. 1996. Response of women aged 65–74 to invitation for screening for breast cancer by mammography: a pilot study in London, UK. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol 50, 77–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, F., King, A., Ryan, R. and Sadler, G. 1996. Reasons for failure to re-attend for repeat screening mammography in women aged 50–69 years of age in Western Australia, Perth, University of Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kee, F., Telford, A.M., Donaghy, P. and O’Doherty, A. 1992. Attitude or access: reasons for not attending mammography in Northern Ireland. European Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol 1, 311–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, S., Dawes, V.P. and Wiese, S.M. 1996. Client Satisfaction Survey 1995. Women’s Cancer Screening Service, Occasional Paper 81. University of Western Australia, Perth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K. 1966. A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, vol 74, 134–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, A. 2001. The extent of patients’ understanding of the risk of treatments. Quality in Health Care, vol 10 (Suppl), i14–i18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, J., Hensher, D. and Swait, J. 2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munn, E.M. 1993. Nonparticipation in mammography screening: apathy, anxiety or cost? New Zealand Medical Journal, vol 106, 284–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffle, A.E. 2001. Information about screening–is it to achieve high uptake or to ensure informed choice? Health Expectations, vol 4, 92–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rimer, B.K., Kasper Keintz, M., Kessler, H.B., Engstrom, P.F. and Rosan, J.R. 1989. Why women resist screening mammography: patient-related barriers. Radiology, vol 172, 243–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scaf-Klomp, W., van Sonderen, F.L., Stewart, R., van Dijck, J.A. and van den Heuvel, W.J. 1995. Compliance after 17 years of breast cancer screening. Journal of Medical Screening, vol 2, 195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaytor, E.K. and Ward, J.E. 1998. How risks of breast cancer and benefits of screening are communicated to women: analysis of 58 pamphlets. British Medical Journal, vol 317, 263–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sox, H.C. 1998. Benefit and harm associated with screening for breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, vol 338 (1), 145–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viney, R., De Abreu Lorenco, R., Kitcher, D. and Gerard, K. 1999. NSW Breast and Cervical Screening Program Review. Report for NSW Department of Health, Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woloshin, S., Schwartz, L., Byram, S.J., Sox, H., Fischoff, B. and Welch, G. 2000. Women’s understanding of the mammography screening debate. Archives of Internal Medicine, vol 160, 1434–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gerard, K., Shanahan, M., Louviere, J. (2008). Using Discrete Choice Modelling to Investigate Breast Screening Participation. In: Ryan, M., Gerard, K., Amaya-Amaya, M. (eds) Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care. The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5753-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics