Skip to main content

Effect of planting technique and amendment type on pearl millet yield, nutrient uptake, and water use on degraded land in Niger

  • Conference paper
Advances in Integrated Soil Fertility Management in sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities

Abstract

Due to increased population pressure and limited availability of fertile land, farmers on desert fringes increasingly rely on marginal land for agricultural production, which they have learned to rehabilitate with different technologies for soils and water conservation. One such method is the indigenous zai technique used in the Sahel. It combines water harvesting and targeted application of organic amendments by the use of small pits dug into the hardened soil. To study the resource use efficiency of this technique, experiments were conducted 1999–2000, on-station at ICRISAT in Niger, and on-farm at two locations on degraded lands. On-station, the effect of application rate of millet straw and cattle manure on millet dry matter production was studied. On-farm, the effects of organic amendment type (millet straw and cattle manure, at the rate of 300 g per plant) and water harvesting (with and without water harvesting) on millet grain yield, dry matter production, and water use were studied. First, the comparison of zai vs. flat planting, both unamended, resulted in a 3- to 4-fold (in one case, even 19- fold) increase in grain yield on-farm in both years, which points to the yield effects of improved water harvesting in the zai alone. Zai improved the water use efficiency by a factor of about 2. The yields increased further with the application of organic amendments. Manure resulted in 2–68 times better grain yields than no amendment and 2–7 times better grain yields than millet straw (higher on the more degraded soils). Millet dry matter produced per unit of manure N or K was higher than that of millet straw, a tendency that was similar for all rates of application. Zai improved nutrient uptake in the range of 43–64% for N, 50–87% for P and 58–66% for K. Zai increased grain yield produced per unit N (8 vs. 5 kg kg-1) and K (10 vs. 6 kg kg-1) compared to flat; so is the effect of cattle manure compared to millet straw (9 vs. 4 kg kg-1, and 14 vs. 3 kg kg-1), respectively, Therefore zai shows a good potential for increasing agronomic efficiency and nutrient use efficiency. Increasing the rate of cattle manure application from 1 to 3 t ha-1 increased the yield by 115% TDM, but increasing the manure application rate further from 3 to 5 t ha-1 only gave an additional 12% yield increase, which shows that optimum application rates are around 3t ha-1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amissah-Arthur A., Mougenot B. and Loireau M. 2000. Assessing farmland dynamics and land degradation on Sahelian landscapes using remotely sensed and socioeconomic data. Intl J. Geograph. Inform. Sci. 14(6): 583–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bationo A., Christianson C.B. and Baethgen W.E. 1990. Plant density and nitrogen fertilizer effects on pearl millet production in a sandy soil in Niger. Agron. J. 82: 290–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bationo A. and Mokwunye A.U. 1991. Role of cattle manures and crop residue in alleviating soil fertility constraints to crop production: with special reference to the Sahelian and the Soudanian zone of West Africa. Fertil. Res. 29: 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bationo A., Mokwunye U., Vlek P.L.G., Koala S. and Shapiro B.I. 2003. Soil fertility management for sustainable land use in the West African sudano-sahelian zone. In: Soil Fertility Management in Africa: A regional perspective. Academy Science Publisher & Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility, pp. 253–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breman H. and de Wit C.T. 1983. Rangeland productivity and exploitation in the Sahel. Science 221: 1341–1347.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown P.L. 1971. Water use and soil water depletion by dryland winter wheat as affected by nitrogen fertilization. Agron. J. 63: 43–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buerkert A., Bationo A. and Dossa K. 2000. Mechanisms of residue mulch-induced cereal growth increases in West Africa. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 64: 346–358.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell C.A. and Paul B.A. 1978. Effect of fertilizer N and soil moisture on mineralization, N recovery and A-values, under spring wheat grown in small lysimeters. Can. J. Soil Sci. 58: 39–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell C.A., Davidson H.R. and Warder F.D. 1977. Effects of fertilizer N and soil water in yield, yield components, protein content and N accumulation in the aboveground parts of spring wheat. Can. J. Soil Sci. 57: 311–327.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Casenave A. and Valentin C. 1989. Les e’ tats de surface de la zone sahelienne; Influence sur l’infiltration. Les processus et les facteurs de re’ organisation superficielle, Ed. ORSTOM. Institut Francc ais de Recherche Scientifique pour le De’ veloppement en Coope’ ration, Collection Didactiques, Paris, pp. 65–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christianson C.B. and Vlek P.L.G. 1991. Alleviating soil fertility constraints to food production in west Africa: efficiency of nitrogen fertilizer applied to food crops. Fertil. Res. 29: 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Ridder N., Breman H., van Keulen H. and Stomph T.J. 2004. Revisiting a ‘cure against land hunger’: soil fertility management and farming systems dynamics in the west African Sahel. Agricult. Sys. 80: 109–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan A. 1996. Improved traditional planting pits in the Tahoua department, Niger. An example of rapid adoption by farmers. In: Reij C., Scoones I. and Toulmin C. (eds.), Sustaining the Soil. Indigenous Soil and Water Conservation in Africa. Earthscan Publisher, pp.56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houba V.J.G., Van de Lee J.J. and Novozamsky I. 1995. Soil and Plant Analysis, Part 5B, Syllabus 1995. In: Soil Analysis Procedures, Other Procedures. Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Wageningen Agricultural University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabore’ V. 1995. Amelioration de la production ve’ ge’ tale des sols de’ grades (zipelles) du Burkina Faso par la technique des poquets (“zai”). Ph.D. thesis, EPFL (no 1302), Lausanne, 201 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katyal J.C. and Vlek P.L.G. 2000. Desertification – concept, causes and amelioration, ZEF Discussion Paper on Development Policy 33, 65 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawes Agricultural Trust 2000. GENSTAT® 6 release 1. VSN International, Wilkinson House, Jordan Hills Road, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels K., Sivakumar M.V.K. and Allison B.E. 1995. Wind Erosion Control using Crop Residue: I. Effect on soil flux and soil properties. Field Crop. Res. 40: 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldeman L.R., Hakkeling R.T.A. and Sombroek W.G. 1990. World Map of the Status of Human-Induced Soil Degradation: An Explanatory Note, Revised edition. International Soil Reference and Information Centre, United Nation Environment Program, Wageningen, Nairobi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouedraogo M. and Kabore’ V. 1996. The “zai”: a traditional technique for the rehabilitation of degraded land in the Yatenga, Burkina Faso. In: Reij C., Scoones I. and Toulmin C. (eds.), Sustaining the Soil. Indigenous Soil and Water Conservation in Africa. Earthscan Publisher, pp.80–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne W.A., Lloyd R., Arthur H., Onken B. and Wendt C.W. 1995. Nitrogen and phosphorus uptake in pearl millet and its relation to nutrient and transpiration efficiency. Agron. J. 87: 425–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penning de Vries F.W.T. and Djiteye M.A. 1982. L’e’ levage et l’exploitation des paturages au Sahel. In: Penning de Vries F.W.T. and Djiteye M.A. (eds.), La productivite’ des paturages Saheliens. Une e’ tude des sols, des ve’ ge’ tations et de l’exploitation de cette ressource naturelle. Centre for Agricultural Publication and Documentation, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichot J., Sedogo M.P., Poulain J.L. and Arrivets J. 1981. Evolution de la fertilite’ d’un sol ferrugineux sous l’influence de fumures mine’ rales et organiques. Agron. Trop. 36: 122– 133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieri C. 1986. Fertilisation des cultures vivrie‘ res et fertilite’ des sols en agriculture paysanne sub-saharienne. Agron. Trop. 41: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roose E., Dugue’ P. and Rodriguez L. 1992. La G.C.E.S. Une nouvelle strategie de lutte anti-erosive appliquee a l’ amenagement de terroirs en zone soudano- sahelienne du Burkina Faso. Revue Bois et forě ts des Tropiques 233: 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roose E., Kabore’ V. and Guenat C. 1993. Le“zai”: Fonctionnement, limites et ame’ lioration, d’une pratique traditionnelle africaine de re’ habilitation de la ve’ ge’ tation et de la productivite’ des terres de’ grade’ es en re’ gion soudano-sahelienne (Burkina Faso). Cahier de l’ORSTOM, Se’ rie Pe’ dologie XXVIII(2): 59–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff 1998. Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 8th edition. USDA/NRCS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundquist B. 2004. Land area data and aquatic area data; a compilation. Edition 1, March, 2004. http:/home.Alltel.net/ bsundquistl/laO.html [checked 5.12.2005].

    Google Scholar 

  • West L.T., Wilding L.P., Landeck J.K. and Galhoun F.G. 1984. Soil Survey of the Icrisat Sahelian Center, Niger. Soil and Crop Science Department/TropSoils TexasA&MSystem, College Station, Texas in cooperation with the International Crop Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams T.O., Powell J.M. and Fernandez-Rivera S. 1995. Manure availability in relation to sustainable food crop production in Semi-Arid West Africa: evidence from Niger. Quart. J. Intl Agricul. 34: 248–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright J.R. and Black A.L. 1978. Soil water use and recharge in a fertilized mixed prairie plant community. J. Range Manag. 31: 280–282.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fatondji, D., Martius, C., Bielders, C., Vlek, P., Bationo, A., Gerard, B. (2007). Effect of planting technique and amendment type on pearl millet yield, nutrient uptake, and water use on degraded land in Niger. In: Bationo, A., Waswa, B., Kihara, J., Kimetu, J. (eds) Advances in Integrated Soil Fertility Management in sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5760-1_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics