Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology ((VERT))

Abstract

In studying the nature of variation and determining the taxonomic composition of a hominin fossil assemblage the phylogenetically closest and thus the most relevant modern comparators are Homo and Pan and following these, Gorilla and Pongo. Except for Pan, however, modern hominids lack taxonomic diversity, since by most accounts each one is represented by a single living species. Pan is the sister taxon to modern humans and it is represented by two living species. As such the species of Pan have greater relevance for studying interspecific variation in fossil hominin taxonomy. Despite their relatively impoverished species representations Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla and Pongo pygmaeus are, nevertheless, represented by subspecies. This makes them relevant for studying the nature of intraspecific variation, in particular for addressing the question of subspecies in hominin taxonomy. The aim of this study is to examine the degree and pattern of molar variation in species and subspecies of P. pygmaeus, G. gorilla, P. troglodytes and P. paniscus. I test the hypothesis that measurements taken on the occlusal surface of molars are capable of discriminating between species and subspecies in commingled samples of great apes. The results of this study are used to draw inferences about our ability to differentiate between species and subspecies of fossil hominins. The study samples include P. t. troglodytes (n = 152), P. t. verus (n = 64), P. t. schweinfurthii (n = 79), G. g. gorilla (n = 208), G. g. graueri (n = 61), G. g. beringei (n = 30), P. p. pygmaeus (n = 140), and P. p. abelii (n = 25) . Measurements taken from digital images were used to calculate squared Mahalanobis distances between subspecies pairs. Results indicate that molar metrics are successful in differentiating between the genera, species and subspecies of great apes. There was a hierarchical level of differentiation, with the greatest separation between genera, followed by that between species within the genus Pan and finally between subspecies within species. The patterns of molar differentiation showed excellent concordance with the patterns of molecular differentiation, which suggests that molar metrics have a reasonably strong phylogenetic signal. Pan troglodytes troglodytes and P. troglodytes schweinfurthii were separated by the least dental distance. P. troglodytes verus was separated by a greater distance from these two, but on the whole the distances among subspecies of P. troglodytes were less than among subspecies of G. gorilla and P. pygmaeus. The dental distance between G. g. gorilla and G. g. graueri was greater than that observed between P. troglodytes and P. paniscus. With size adjustment intergroup distances between gorilla subspecies were reduced, resulting in distances comparable to subspecies of P. troglodytes. A contrast between size-preserved and size-adjusted analyses reveal that size, sexual dimorphism and shape are significant factors in the patterning of molar variation in great apes. The results of this study have several implications for hominin taxonomy, including identifying subspecies among hominins. These implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackermann, R.R., 2002. Patterns of covariation in the hominoid craniofacial skeleton: implications for paleoanthropological models. Journal of Human Evolution 42, 167–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, G.H., Gelvin, B.R., Miller, J.M.A., 2003. The hierarchy of intraspecific craniometric variation in gorillas: a population-thinking approach with implications for fossil species recognition studies. In: Taylor, A.B., Goldsmith, M.L. (Eds.), Gorilla Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 62–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, S.E., Pilbrow, V.C., Wood, B.A., 2004. Interobserver error involved in independent attempts to measure cusp base areas of Pan M1s . Journal of Anatomy 205, 323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begun, D.R., 1992. Miocene fossil hominids and the chimp-human clade. Science 257, 1929–1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, J.C., 1995. Définition de certains caractères discrets crâniens chez Pongo, Gorilla, et Pan. Perspectives taxonomiques et phylogénétiques. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Bordeaux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caccone, A., Powell, J.R., 1989. DNA divergence among hominoids. Evolution 43, 925–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collard, M., Wood, B., 2000. How reliable are human phylogenetic hypothesis? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97, 5003–5006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collard, M., Wood, B., 2001. Homoplasy and the early hominid masticatory system: inferences from analyses of extant hominoids and papionins. Journal of Human Evolution 41, 167–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coolidge, H.J., 1929. A revision of the genus Gorilla. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology Harvard 50, 293–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coolidge, H.J., 1933. Pan paniscus: Pygmy chimpanzee from south of the Congo River. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 18, 1–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtenay, J., Groves, C.P., Andrews, P., 1988. Inter– or intra-island variation? An assessment of the differences between Bornean and Sumatran orang-utans. In: Schwartz, J.H. (Ed.), Orangutan Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darroch, J.N., Mosimann, J.E., 1985. Canonical and principal components of shape. Biometrika 72, 241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falsetti, A.B., Jungers, W.L., Cole III, T.M., 1993. Morphometrics of the callitrichid forelimb: a case study in size and shape. International Journal of Primatology 14, 551–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma, D.J., 1986. Evolutionary Biology. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagneux, P., Wills, C., Gerloff, U., Tautz, D., Morin, P.A., Boesch, C., Fruth, B., Hohmann, G., Ryder, O., Woodruff, D.S., 1999. Mitochondrial sequences show diverse evolutionary histories of African hominoids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 96, 5077–5082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, K.J., Ryder, O.A., 1996. Mitochondrial DNA diversity in gorillas. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 6, 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, S., Collard, M., Wood, B., 2000. Soft-tissue characters in higher primate phylogenetics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97, 11130–11132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, T.L., 1998. Biogeographic predictors of genetic diversity in populations of eastern African chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii). International Journal of Primatology 19, 237–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonder, M.K., Oates, J.E., Disotell, T.R., Forstner, M.R.J., Morales, J.C., Melnick, D.J., 1997. A new west African chimpanzee subspecies? Nature 388, 337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, M., 1962. Evolution of the immunologic species specificity of human serum proteins. Human Biology 34, 104–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, M., Romero-Herrera, A.E., Dene, H., Czelusniak, J., Tashian, R.E., 1982. Macromolecular sequences in systematic and evolutionary biology. In: Goodman, M. (Ed.), Macromolecular Sequences in Systematic and Evolutionary Biology. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 115–191.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, M., Porter, C.A., Czelusniak, J., Page, S.L., Schneider, H., Shoshani, J., Gunnell, G., Groves, C.P., 1998. Toward a phylogenetic classification of primates based on DNA evidence complemented by fossil evidence. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 585–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, C.P., 1967. Ecology and taxonomy of the Gorilla. Nature 213, 890–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, C.P., 1970. Population systematics of the Gorilla. Journal of Zoology. London. 161, 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, C.P., 1986. Primate systematics. In: Swindler, D.R., Erwin, J. (Eds.), Comparative Primate Biology, Volume 1. Systematics, Evolution, and Anatomy. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 187–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, C.P., 2001. Primate Taxonomy. Smithsonian University Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, P., 1982. Refuges and dispersals in the speciation of African forest mammals. In: Prance, G.T. (Ed.), Biological Diversification in the Tropics. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 537–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, P., 1999. Evolutionary processes implicit in distribution patterns of modern African mammals. In: Bromage, T.J., Schrenk, F. (Eds.), African Biogeography, Climate Change, and Human Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 150–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy, F., Brunet, M., Schmittbuhl, M., Viriot, L., 2003. New approaches in hominoid taxonomy: morphometrics. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 121, 198–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvati, K., Frost, S.R., McNulty, K.P., 2004. Neanderthal taxonomy reconsidered: implications of 3D primate models of intra- and interspecific differences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101,1147–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, W.C.O., 1967. The taxonomy of the genus Pan. In: Starck, D. Schneider, R., Kuhn, H.-J. (Eds.), Neue Ergebnisse der Primatologie. Fischer, Stuttgart, pp. 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, W.C.O., 1969. The nomenclature, taxonomy and distribution of Chimpanzees. In: Bourne, G.H. (Ed.). The Chimpanzee. Vol. 1. Karger, Basel, pp. 22–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, A.D., 1979. The taxonomic status of the bonobo chimpanzee. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 51, 273–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, F.C., McCullough, C.E., 1990. Multivariate statistical methods in ecology and systematics: Panacea or Pandora’s Box. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 211, 129–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, P., 1990. Catalogue of Primates in the British Museum (Natural History). Part V. Natural History Museum Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen-Seaman, M.I., Kidd, K.K., 2001. Mitochondrial DNA variability and biogeography of eastern gorillas. Molecular Ecology 10, 2241–2247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen-Seaman, M.I., Deinard, A.S., Kidd, K.K., 2003. Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA estimates of divergence between western and eastern gorillas. In: Taylor, A.B., Goldsmith, M.L. (Eds.), Gorilla Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 247–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, D.C., 1974. An odontological study of the chimpanzee with some implications for hominoid evolution. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, C.J., 1993. Species, subspecies, and baboon systematics. In: Kimbel, W.H., Martin, L.B. (Eds.) Species, Species Concepts, and Primate Evolution. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 67–107.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, C.J., 2001. A proper study for mankind: analogies from the papionin monkeys and their implications for human evolution. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 44, 177–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, C.J., Oates, J.F., Disotell, T.R., 1995. Chimpanzee kinship. Science 268, 185–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungers, W.L. Susman, R.S., 1984. Body size and skeletal allometry in African apes. In: Susman, R.L. (Ed.), Evolutionary Morphology and Behavior of the Pygmy Chimpanzee. Plenum Press, New York. pp. 131–178.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kano, T., 1992. The Last Ape: Pygmy Chimpanzee Behavior and Ecology. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbel, W.H., 1991. Species, species concepts and hominid evolution. Journal of Human Evolution 20, 355–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimbel, W.H., Martin, L.B., 1993. (Eds). Species, Species Concepts and Primate Evolution. Plenum Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J., 1989. Island Africa. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzey, W.G., 1984. The dentition of the pygmy chimpanzee, Pan paniscus. In: Susman, R.L. (Ed.), The Pygmy Chimpanzee: Evolutionary Biology and Behavior. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 65–88.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, S.R., Shea, B.T., 1995. Ontogeny and the evolution of adult body size dimorphism in apes. American Journal of Primatology 36, 37–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, S.R., Relethford, J.H., Park, P.B., Konigsberg, L.W., 2003. Morphological differentiation of Gorilla subspecies. In: Taylor, A.B., Goldsmith, M.L. (Eds.), Gorilla Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 104–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindstedt, S.L., Calder, W.A.III., 1981. Body size, physiological time, and longevity of homeothermic animals. Quaterly Review of Biology 56, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, C.A., Kimbel, W.H., Lynch, J.M., 2004. Morphometrics and hominoid phylogeny: Support for a chimpanzee-human clade and differentiation among great ape subspecies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101, 4356–4360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahler, P.E., 1973. Metric variation in the pongid dentition. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., 1982. Of what use are subspecies? The Auk 99, 593–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.M.A., Albrecht, G.H., Gelvin, B.R., 2004. Craniometric variation in early Homo compared to modern gorillas: a population-thinking approach. In: Anapol, F., German, R.Z., Jablonski, N.G. (Eds.), Shaping Primate Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 66–96.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morbeck, M.E., Zihlman, A.L., 1989. Body size and proportions in chimpanzees, with special reference to Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii from Gombe National Park, Tanzania. Primates 30, 369–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, P.A., Moore, J.J., Chakraborthy, R., Jin, L., Goodall, J., Woodruff, D.S., 1994. Kin selection, social structure, gene flow, and the evolution of chimpanzees. Science 265, 1193–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosimann, J.E., James, F. C., 1979. New statistical methods for allometry with application to Florida red-winged blackbirds. Evolution 33, 444–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muir C.C., Galdikas B.M., Beckenbach A.T., 2000. MtDNA sequence diversity of orangutans from the islands of Borneo and Sumatra. Journal of Molecular Evolution 51, 471–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilbeam, D., 1996. Genetic and morphological records of the Hominoidea and hominid origins: a synthesis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 5, 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilbeam, D., 2000. Hominoid systematics: the soft evidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97, 10684–10686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilbrow, V.C., 2003. Dental variation in African apes with implications for understanding patterns of variation in species of fossil apes. Ph.D. Dissertation, New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilbrow, V.C., 2006a. Lingual incisor waits in the modern hominoids and their utility for fossil hominoid taxonomy. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 129, 323-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilbrow, V.C., 2006b. Population systematics of chimpanzees using molar morphometrics. Journal of Human Evolution 51, 646-662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilbrow, V.C. Bailey, S.E., 2005. Patterns of intraspecific variation in dental metrics of Gorilla gorilla, Pan troglodytes and Homo sapiens: a comparison using Wright’s (1969) Fst statistic. PaleoAnthropology 3, 13. http://pa.pennpress.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Röhrer-Ertl, O., 1984. Research history, nomenclature and taxonomy of the orang-utan. In: Schwartz, J.H., (Ed.), Orang-utan Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford,pp. 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruvolo, M., 1994. Molecular evolutionary processes and conflicting gene trees: the hominoid case. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 94, 89–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruvolo, M., 1997. Molecular phylogeny of the hominoids: inferences from multiple independent DNA sequence data sets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14, 248–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruvolo, M., Pan, D., Zehr, S., Goldberg, T., Disotell, T.R., 1994. Gene trees and hominoid phylogeny. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 91, 8900–8904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltonstall, K., Amato, G., Powell, J., 1998. Mitochondrial DNA variability in Grauer’s gorillas of Kahuzi-Biega National Park. Journal of Heredity 89, 129–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarmiento, E.E., Butynski, T., 1996. Present problems in gorilla taxonomy. Gorilla Journal 19, 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarmiento, E.E., Oates, J.F., 2000. The Cross River gorillas: a distinct subspecies, Gorilla gorilla diehli Matschie 1904. Am. Mus. Novitates 3250, 56 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, K., Mitteroecker, P., Gunz, P., Bernhard, M., Bookstein, F.L., 2004. Craniofacial sexual dimorphism patterns and allometry among extant hominids. Annals of Anatomy 186, 471–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J.H., 1984. The evolutionary relationships of man and orang-utans. Nature 308, 501–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J.E., Lockwood C.A., 2004. Patterns of tooth crown size and shape variation in great apes and humans and species recognition in the hominid fossil record. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 125, 303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, B.T., 1981. Relative growth of the limbs and trunk in the African apes. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 56, 179–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, B.T., 1983a. Size and diet in the evolution of African ape craniodental form. Folia Primatologica 40, 32–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, B.T., 1983b. Allometry and heterochrony in the African apes. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 62, 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, B.T., 1983c. Paedomorphy and neoteny in the pygmy chimpanzee. Science 222, 521–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, B.T., 1984. An allometric perspective on the morphological and evolutionary relationships between pygmy (Pan paniscus) and common (Pan troglodytes) chimpanzees. In: Susman, R.L. (Ed.), The Pygmy Chimpanzee: Evolutionary Biology and Behavior. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 89–130.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, B.T., Coolidge, H.J. Jr., 1988. Craniometric differences and systematics in the genus Pan. Journal of Human Evolution 17, 671–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, B.T., Leigh, S.R., Groves, C.P., 1993. Multivariate craniometric variation in chimpanzees: implications for species identification in paleoanthropology. In: Kimbel, W.H., Martin, L.B. (Eds.), Species, Species Concepts, and Primate Evolution. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 265–296.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, C., Ahlquist, J., 1984. The phylogeny of the hominoid primates, as indicated by DNA-DNA hybridization. Journal of Molecular Evolution 20, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H., Chiszar, M.D., Montanucci, R.R., 1997. Subspecies and classification. Herpetological Review 28, 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, R.M., Polk, J.D., Oates, J.F., Jungers, W.L., Heesy, C.P., Groves, C.P., Fleagle, J. G., 2003. Patterns of diversity in gorilla cranial morphology. In: Taylor, A.B., Goldsmith, M.L. (Eds.), Gorilla Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 35–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swindler, D.R., 1976. Dentition of Living Primates. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swindler, D.R., 2002. Primate Dentition: An Introduction to the Teeth of Non-Human Primates. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A.B., 2006. Size and shape dimorphism in great ape mandibles and implications for fossil species recognition. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 129, 82–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A.B., Groves, C.P., 2003. Patterns of mandibular variation in Pan and Gorilla and implications for African ape taxonomy. Journal of Human Evolution 44, 529–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall, I., 1986. Species recognition in human paleontology. Journal of Human Evolution 15, 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall. I., 1991. What was the human revolution? Journal of Human Evolution 20, 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall, I., 1993. Speciation and morphological differentiation in the genus Lemur. In: Kimbel, W.H., Martin, L.B. (Eds.), Species, Species Concepts, and Primate Evolution. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 163–176.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, A.R., 1999. Human Races: A genetic and evolutionary perspective. American Anthropologist 100, 632–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uchida, A., 1992. Intra-species variation among the great apes: Implications for taxonomy of fossil hominoids. Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchida, A., 1996. Craniodental variation among the great apes. Peabody Museum Bulletin, 4. Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpoff, M.H., Hawks, J., Frayer, D.W., Hunley, K. 2001. Modern human ancestry at the peripheries: a test of the replacement theory. Science. 291, 293–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B., Richmond, B.G., 2000. Human evolution: taxonomy and paleobiology. Journal of Anatomy 197, 19–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R.W., de Waal, F.B.M., McGrew, W.C., 1994. The challenge of behavioral diversity. In: Wrangham, R.W., McGrew, W.C., de Waal, F.B.M., Heltne, P.G. (Eds.), Chimpanzee Cultures. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X., Arnason, U., 1996. The mitochondrial DNA molecule of Sumatran orangutan and a molecular proposal for two (Bornean and Sumatran) species of orangutan. Journal of Molecular Evolution 43, 431–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhi, L., Karesh, W.B., Janczewski, D.N., Frazier-Taylor, H., Sajuthi, D., Gombek, F., Andau, M., Martenson, J.S., O’Brien, S.J., 1996. Genomic differentiation among natural populations of orang-utan (Pongo pygmaeus). Current Biology 6, 1326–1336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Pilbrow .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pilbrow, V. (2007). Patterns of molar variation in great apes and their implications for hominin taxonomy. In: Bailey, S.E., Hublin, JJ. (eds) Dental Perspectives on Human Evolution: State of the Art Research in Dental Paleoanthropology. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5845-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics