The evolution of technical artifacts is often seen as radically different from the evolution of biological species. Technical artifacts are normally understood to result from the purposive intelligence of designers whereas biological species and organisms are held to have resulted from evolution by natural selection. But could it be that technology, too, is really the outcome of evolutionary processes rather than intelligent design? Recent decades have seen the emergence of evolutionary theories of technology, which use concepts and principles drawn from evolutionary biology to describe and explain processes of technological innovation and technological change. In this chapter, I will focus on three prominent theories, by George Basalla, Joel Mokyr and Robert Aunger, and I will investigate to what extent these theories present a truly evolutionary account of technological innovation and change. In the end, I aim to analyze how these theories construe technological design: as a blind evolutionary process, a purposive activity of designers, or a mixture of both.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andersen, E., ed., 1994, Evolutionary Economics: Post-Schumpeterian Contributions, Pinter Publishers, London.
Aunger, R., 2002, The Electric Meme, Free Press, New York.
Aunger, R., ed., 2000, Darwinizing Culture. The Status of Memetics as a Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Basalla, G., 1988, The Evolution of Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Bijker, W., Pinch, T., and Hughes, T., eds., 1987, The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Blackmore, S., 1999, The Meme Machine, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Callebaut, W., and Pinxten, R., eds., 1987, Evolutionary Epistemology: A Multiparadigm Program, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Cziko, G., 1995, Without Miracles: Universal Selection Theory and the Second Darwinian Revolution, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Darwin, C., 1859, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Murray, London.
Dawkins, R., 1976, The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Dawkins, R., 1986, The Blind Watchmaker, Norton, New York.
Dembsky, W. (1999). Intelligent Design: The Bridge Between Science and Theology, InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove.
Dennett, D., 1995, Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life, Simon and Schuster, New York.
Dopfer, K., ed., 2005, The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hahlweg, K., and Hooker, C., eds., 1989, Issues in Evolutionary Epistemology, SUNY Press, Albany, NY.
Haugeland, J., 1981, The nature and plausibility of cognitivism, in: Mind Design, J. Haugeland, ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 243-281.
Little, D., 1991, Varieties of Social Explanation, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
Mokyr, J., 1996, Evolution and technological change: a new metaphor for economic history, in: Technological Change, R. Fox, ed., Harwood Publishers, London.
Mokyr, J., 1998, Induced technical innovation and medical history: an evolutionary approach, J. Evol. Econ. 8:119-137.
Mokyr, J., 1999, Invention and rebellion: why do innovations occur at all? an evolutionary approach, in: Minorities and Economic Growth, E. Brezis and P. Temin, eds., Elsevier Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 179-203.
Mokyr, J., 2000a, Innovation and selection in evolutionary models of technology: some defini-tional issues, in: Technological Innovation as an Evolutionary Process, J. Ziman, ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Mokyr, J., 2000b, Knowledge, technology, and economic growth during the industrial revolution, in: Productivity, Technology and Economic Growth, B. Van Ark, S. Kuipers, and G. Kuper, eds., Kluwer/Springer, The Hague.
Paley, W., 1802, Natural theology: Or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature, J. Faulder, London.
Ziman, J., ed., 2000, Technological Innovation as an Evolutionary Process, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brey, P. (2008). Technological Design as an Evolutionary Process. In: Philosophy and Design. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6591-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6591-0_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6590-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6591-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)