Abstract
In semantic approaches to modality inspired by Kratzer (1981, 1991), modal verbs are construed as introducing possible worlds. An examination of the syntactic properties of English modals suggests a somewhat different perspective. On the one hand, English modal verbs belong to the class of auxiliary verbs which map spatial configurations defined in VP onto a temporal interval defined in TP, deriving events and states. On the other hand, English modal auxiliaries, like lexical modals in Romance, Germanic, and Old English, function as causative verbs: they bridge the gap between an input spatial configuration holding at some instant of time and an output configuration holding at the next instant of time by introducing an instrument capable of effecting the change of configuration. The grammar provides for two types of causality, intentional causality, in which the instrument of change is triggered and manipulated by a [+human] Agent, and metaphysical causality (cf. Condoravdi, 2002) in which the instrument of change needs no human trigger. It is claimed that causative verbs lack the lexical content motivating an Agent argument, and are thus necessarily associated with metaphysical causality. The [+human] subject of causative verbs, including modal verbs, is thus not to be construed as an Agent but rather as an instrument of metaphysical causality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bickerton, D. & S. Iatridou (1987) “Verb Serialization and Empty Categories”, MS. U. of Amsterdam.
Carlson, G. (1995) “Truth Conditions of Generic Sentences: Two Constrasting Views” in G. Carlson & F. Pelletier, eds., The Generic Book, U. of Chicago Press, 224-237.
Chomsky, N. (1995) The Minimalist Program, MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2001) “Derivation by Phase” in M. Kenstowicz, ed., Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1-52.
Condoravdi, C. (2002) “Temporal Interpretation of Modals” in: Beaver, D. et al. (eds.), The Construction of Meaning, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA., 59-87.
Copley, B. (2006) “Temporal Orientation in Conditionals” this volume.
Copley, B. (2005) “Ordering and Reasoning” New Work on Modality, MITWPL 51, 7-34.
den Dikken, M. & R. Sybesma (1998) “Take Serials Light Up the Middle”, ms. U. of Tilburg.
Enç, M. (1987) “Anchoring Conditions for Tense”, Linguistic Inquiry, 18,4, 633-657.
von Fintel, K. & S. Iatridou (2007) “Anatomy of a Modal Construction”, Linguistic Inquiry 38, 445-483.
Folli, R. & H. Harley (2007) “Teleology and animacy in external arguments” talk at the FIGS conference in Paris.
Giorgi, A. & F. Pianesi (1997) Tense and Aspect, Oxford University Press.
Gu éron, J. (2004) “Tense Construal and the Argument Structure of Auxiliaries” in J. Gu éron & J. Lecarme, eds.
Gu éron, J. (2005) “Tense, Person, and Transitivity” in N. Shir & T. Rapoport, eds. The Syntax of Aspect, Oxford University Press, 89-116.
Gu éron, J. (2006) “Generic Sentences and Bare Plurals” in S. Vogeleer & L. Tasmowski, eds., Non-definiteness and Plurality, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 219-234.
Gu éron, J. & T. Hoekstra (1988) “T-Chains and the Constituent Structure of Auxiliaries” in A. Cardinaletti et al. eds., Proceedings of the Glow Conference in Venice 1987, Dordrecht, Foris, 35-99.
Gu éron, J. & J. Lecarme, eds. (2004) The Syntax of Time, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Harley, H. (1998) “You’re having me on! Aspects of have” in: J. Gu éron & A. ZribiHertz, eds., La grammaire de la possession, Universit é Paris X, Nanterre, 195-226.
Hoekstra, T. & I. Roberts (1993) “Middle Constructions in Dutch and English” in: E. Reuland & W. Abraham. eds., Knowledge and Language, II, Doredrecht, Kluwer, 183-220.
Iatridou, S. (2000) “The Grammatical Ingredients of Counterfactuality” Linguistic Inquiry, 31, 231-270.
Kayne, R. (1975) French Syntax, Cambrdige, MA, MIT Press.
Kratzer, A. (1981) “The Notional Category of Modality” in: Eikmeyer, H. J. & H. Rieser, eds., Words, Worlds, and Contexts. Berlin, de Gruyter, 38-74
Kratzer, A. (1991) “Modality” in A. van Stechow & D. Wunderlich, Handbook of Semantics. Berlin. de Gruyter, 639-650.
Kuroda, S.-Y. (1972) “The Categorical Jugement and the Thetic Judgement”, Foundations of Language 9, 153-185.
Laca, B. (2004) “Romance ‘Aspectual’ Periphrases: Eventuality Modification versus ‘Syntactic’ Aspect”, in Gu éron & Lecarme, eds.
Landau, I. (2000) Elements of Control: Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constuctions, Dordrecht, Kluwer.
Lecarme, J. (2004) “Tense in Nominals”, in Gu éron & Lecarme, eds.
Lieber, R. (1982) “A Note on the History of the English Auxiliary System”, in A. Marantz & T. Stowell, eds., MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 4, 81-99.
Matushansky, O. (1998) “Instrumental Case and Verb Raising in the Russian Copula”, ms. MIT and U. Paris 8 (more extended version in WCCFL 19)
Reichenbach, H. (1947) Elements of Symbolic Logic, New York, Free Press.
Romero, C. (2005) L’ évolution des verbes modaux dans l’histoire de l’anglais, Doctoral Dissertation, U. Paris 3.
Schwer, S. (2006) “En suivant Reichenbach: les S-langages”, Conference for the Temptypac group.
Shibatani, M. (1975) A Linguistic Study of Causative Constructions, Indiana U. Linguistics Club.
Toupin, F. (2006) “Le pr éverbe BE- du vieil anglais” Travaux de diachronie”, Tours, Presses Universitaires François Rabelais, 59-79.
Travis, L. (2000) “Event Structure in Syntax” in C. Tenny & J. Pustejovsky, eds., Events as Grammatical Objects, Stanford, CA, CSLI Publications, 145-185.
Travis, L. (2006) “Event Semantics in Syntax”, ms. McGill U. von Fintel, K. & S. Iatridou (2005) “Anatomy of a Modal Construction”, Linguistic Inquiry, 38,3, 445-483.
Williams, E. (1974) Rule Ordering in Syntax, Diss. MIT.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guéron, J. (2008). On the Temporal Function of Modal Verbs. In: Guéron, J., Lecarme, J. (eds) Time and Modality. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 75. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8354-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8354-9_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8353-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8354-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)