Skip to main content

Conclusion: The State of the Art in Research on Individual Differences in Executive Control and Cognition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Individual Differences in Cognition

Abstract

The chapters in this book illustrate the richness and diversity of research on individual differences (IDs) in executive control. Our aim in this summary chapter is to identify some of the major themes in this research area, and to discuss how the various chapters address these themes. This chapter is not intended to provide a general synthesis of the field, which would be premature. The reader is referred to the preceding chapters and the commentary sections for the various theoretical perspectives on IDs in executive control. The chapter is organized around three sets of topics. First, we outline the major research issues that provide the foundation for the study of IDs in executive control. Next, we identify some areas of reasonable consensus, at least in terms of general approaches (although significant differences in detail may remain). We finish with a survey of some areas of controversy, where some more fundamental differences between researchers may reside.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackerman, P. L. & Heggestad, E. D. (1997) Intelligence, personality and interests: evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, P. L., Schneider, W., & Wickens, C. D. (1984). Deciding the existence of a time-sharing ability: A combined theoretical and methodological approach. Human Factors, 26, 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barratt, E. S. (1987). Impulsiveness and anxiety: Information processing and electroencephalograph topography. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 453–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braver, T. S., Gray, J. R., & Burgess, G. C. (2007). Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 76–108). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E. (1984). The maltese cross: A new simplistic model for memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 55–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A. H. (1989). Personality as traits. American Psychologist, 44, 1378–1388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canli, T. (2009). Neuroimaging of personality. In P. J. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personality (pp. 305–346). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). On the structure of behavioral self-regulation. In M. Boekarts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 41–84). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2005). Personality and intellectual competence. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claridge, G. (2009). Personality and psychosis. In P. L. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology (pp. 631–648). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corno, L., Cronbach, L., Kupermintz, H., Lohman, D., Mandinach, E., Porteus, A., et al. (2002). Remaking the concept of aptitude: Extending the legacy of Richard E. Snow. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corr, P. J. (2009). The reinforcement sensivity theory of personality. In P. J. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personality (pp. 347–376). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Derryberry, D., & Reed, A. (2002). Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 225–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilisation and the organisation of behavior. Psychological Review, 66, 183–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7, 409–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, A., & Neubauer, A. C. (2004). Extraversion and cortical activation: Effects of task complexity. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 333–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Corley, R. P., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., & Hewitt, J. K. (2006). Not all executive functions are related to intelligence. Psychological Science, 17, 172–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., Corley, R. P., & Hewitt, J. K. (2008). Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 137, 201–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M., & Bargh, J. A. (2005). Automaticity in goal pursuit. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 624–646). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. R., Burgess, G. C., Schaefer, A., Yarkoni, T., Larsen, R. J., & Braver, T. S. (2005). Affective personality differences in neural processing efficiency confirmed using fMRI. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 182–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. R., Chabris, C. F., & Braver, T. S. (2003). Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 316–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, B. W., Omura, K., Constable, R. T., & Canli, T. (2007). Emotional conflict and neuroticism: Personality-dependent activation in the amygdala and subgenual anterior cingulate. Behavioral Neuroscience, 121, 249–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haier, R. J., Siegel, B., Tang, C., Abel, L., & Buchsbaum, M. S. (1992). Intelligence and changes in regional cerebral glucose metabolic rate following learning. Intelligence, 16, 415–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, P. T. (2004). Memory for emotional and nonemotional events in depression: A question of habit? In D. Reisberg & P. Hertel (Eds.), Memory and emotion (pp. 186–216). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hudlicka, E. (2004). Beyond cognition: Modeling emotion in cognitive architectures. In M. Lovett, C. Schunn, C. Lebiere, & P. Munro (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth international conference on cognitive modeling: ICCCM 2004: Integrating models (pp. 118–123). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, W. A., & Dark, V. J. (1986). Selective attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 43–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 637–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 133, 189–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ketelaar, T., & Clore, G. L. (1997). Emotion and reason: The proximate effects and ultimate functions of emotion. In G. Matthews (Ed.), Cognitive science perspectives on personality and emotion (pp. 355–396). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Klimesch, W. (1999). EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: A review and analysis. Brain Research Reviews, 29, 169–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knyazev, G. G., Schutter, D. J. L. G., & van Honk, J. (2006). Anxious apprehension increases coupling of delta and beta oscillations. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 61, 283–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. L. (2001). Mood as input: A configural view of mood effect. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 135–157). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A. (2004). On the malleability of emotional encoding. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 1019–1036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G. (2000). A cognitive science critique of biological theories of personality traits. History and Philosophy of Psychology, 2, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G. (2008). Personality and information processing: A cognitive-adaptive theory. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), Sage handbook of personality theory and testing: Volume 1: Personality theories and models (pp. 56–79). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G. (2009). Cognitive processes and models. In P. L. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personality (pp. 400–426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G., Campbell, S. E., Falconer, S., Joyner, L., Huggins, J., Gilliland, K., et al. (2002). Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: Task engagement, distress and worry. Emotion, 2, 315–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C. (2009). Personality traits (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G., & Gilliland, K. (1999). The personality theories of H. J. Eysenck and J. A. Gray: A comparative review. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 583–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G., & Margetts, I. (1991). Self-report arousal and divided attention: A study of performance operating characteristics. Human Performance, 4, 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G., Schwean, V. L., Campbell, S. E., Saklofske, D. H., & Mohamed, A. A. R. (2000). Personality, self-regulation and adaptation: A cognitive-social framework. In M. Boekarts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 171–207). New York: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G., & Wells, A. (1999). The cognitive science of attention and emotion. In T. Dalgleish & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 171–192). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michielsen, H. J., De Vries, J., & Van Heck, G. L. (2003). In search of personality and temperament predictors of chronic fatigue: A prospective study. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1073–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., & Howerter, A. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. E. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberauer, K., Süß, H.-M., Wilhelm, O., & Sander, N. (2007). Individual differences in working memory capacity and reasoning ability. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, & N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 49–75). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulewicz, B., Chuderski, A., & Nęcka, E. (2007). Insight problem solving, fluid intelligence, and executive control: A structural equation modeling approach. In S. Vosniadou, D. Kayser, & A. Protopapas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd European cognitive science conference (pp. 586–591). Hove, United Kingdom: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phaf, R. H., & Kan, K. (2007). The automaticity of emotional Stroop: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38, 184–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., & DiGirolamo, G. J. (1998). Executive attention: Conflict, target detection and cognitive control. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.), The attentive brain (pp. 401–423). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1999). What’s in your mind? In E. Lepore & Z. W. Pylyshyn (Eds.), What is cognitive science? (pp. 1–25). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razoumnikova, O. (2003). Interaction of personality and intelligence factors in cortex activity modulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 135–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (2009). Traits and the self: Toward an integration. In P. J. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personality (pp. 457–472). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbart, M. K., Sheese, B. E., & Conradt, E. D. (2009). Childhood temperament. In P. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personality (pp. 177–190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a “Big Five” in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36, 555–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel, K., Asendorpf, J. B., & Greenwald, A. G. (2008). Using implicit association tests for the assessment of implicit personality self-concept. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), Sage handbook of personality theory and testing: Volume 2: Personality measurement and testing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegle, G. J., & Hasselmo, E. (2002). Using connectionist models to guide assessment of psychological disorder. Psychological Assessment, 14, 263–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soroko, S. I., & Leonov, V. (1992). Neurodynamic plasticity as a prognostic test of stability of operative activity under contrasting climatic conditions. Human Physiology, 18, 332–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperry, R. W. (1993). The impact and promise of the cognitive revolution. American Psychologist, 48, 878–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymura, B., & Nęcka, E. (2005). Three superfactors of personality and three aspects of attention. In A. Eliasz, S. E. Hampson, & B. de Raad (Eds.), Advances in personality psychology (pp. 75–90). Hove, United Kingdom: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vul, E., Harris, C., Winkielman, P., & Pashler, H. (2009). Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 274–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacker, J., Chavanon, M.-L., & Stemmler, G. (2006). Investigating the dopaminergic basis of extraversion in humans: A multilevel approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 171–187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A. (2000). Emotional disorders and metacognition: Innovative cognitive therapy. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A., & Matthews, G. (1994). Attention and emotion: A clinical perspective. Hove: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A., & Matthews, G. (2006). Cognitive vulnerability to anxiety disorders: An integration. In L. B. Alloy & J. H. Riskind (Eds.), Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders (pp. 303–325). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2000). Personality and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (2nd ed., pp. 581–610). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1991). Psychobiology of personality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerald Matthews .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Matthews, G., Gruszka, A., Szymura, B. (2010). Conclusion: The State of the Art in Research on Individual Differences in Executive Control and Cognition. In: Gruszka, A., Matthews, G., Szymura, B. (eds) Handbook of Individual Differences in Cognition. The Springer Series on Human Exceptionality. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1210-7_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics