Abstract
The classical approach in decision analysis and multiple criteria theory concentrates on subjective ranking, at most including some aspects of intersubjective ranking (ranking understood here in a wide sense, including the selection or a classification of decision options). Intuitive subjective ranking should be distinguished here from rational subjective ranking, based on the data relevant for the decision situation and on an approximation of personal preferences. However, in many practical situations, the decision maker might not want to use personal preferences, but prefers to have some objective ranking. This need of rational objective ranking might have many reasons, some of which are discussed in this chapter. Decision theory avoided the problem of objective ranking partly because of the general doubt in objectivity characteristic for the twentieth century; the related issues are also discussed. While an absolute objectivity is not attainable, the concept of objectivity can be treated as a useful ideal worth striving for; in this sense, we characterize objective ranking as an approach to ranking that is as objective as possible. Between possible multiple criteria approaches, the reference point approach seems to be most suited for rational objective ranking. Some of the basic assumptions and philosophy of reference point approaches are recalled in this chapter. Several approaches to define reference points based on statistical data are outlined. Examples show that such objective ranking can be very useful in many management situations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. Barzilai. A new theory of measurement – correcting the classical errors – preference function modelling. In Proceedings of MCDM 2004 – 17th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Whistler, Canada. Simon Fraser University, 2004.
K. Deb. Multi Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. J. Wiley and Sons, New York, 2001.
M. Ehrgott and D. Tenfelde-Podehl: Computation of ideal and nadir values and implications for their use in MCDM methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 151(1): 119–131, 2003.
M. Foucault. The Order of Things: An Archeology of Human Sciences. Routledge, New York, 1972.
M. Freimer and P.L. Yu. Some new results on compromise solutions for group decision problems. Management Science, 22:688–693, 1976.
J. Granat, M. Makowski, and A.P. Wierzbicki. Hierarchical reference approach to multicriteria analysis of discrete alternatives. In Proceedings of CSM’06: 20th Workshop on Methodologies and Tools for Complex System Modeling and Integrated Policy Assessment. IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, 2006. http://www.iiasa.ac.at/pub/mda/Pubs/csm06/pres/granat.ppt.
J. Granat and A.P. Wierzbicki. Objective classification of empirical probability distributions and the issue of event detection. In Proceedings of 23rd IFIP TC 7 Conference on System Modelling and Optimization. AGH, Cracow, Poland, 2007. http://ifip2007.agh.edu.pl/abstracts/232.pdf.
S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, and R. Slowinski. Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 129:1–47, 2001.
W. Heisenberg. über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik, 43:172–198, 1927.
H.S. Jensen, L.M. Richter, and M.T. Vendelo. The Evolution of Scientific Knowledge. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2003.
R. Keeney. Value Focused Thinking, a Path to Creative Decision Making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.
R. Keeney and H. Raiffa. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. J. Wiley and Sons, New York, 1976.
M.M. Kostreva, W. Ogryczak, and A. Wierzbicki. Equitable aggregations and multiple criteria analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 158:362–377, 2004.
B. Latour. Science in Action. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, UK, 1987.
K. Miettinen. Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1999.
H. Nakayama. Aspiration level approach to multi-objective programming and its applications. In P.M. Pardalos, Y. Siskos, and C. Zopounidis, editors, Advances in Multicriteria Analysis, pages 147–174. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1995.
W. Ogryczak. On multicriteria optimization with fair aggregation of individual achievements. In Proceedings of CSM’06: 20th Workshop on Methodologies and Tools for Complex System Modelling and Integrated Policy Assessment. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria, 2006. http://www.iiasa.ac.at/pub/mda/Pubs/csm06/pres/ogryczak_pap.pdf.
W. Ogryczak and A. Ruszczyński. On consistence of stochastic dominance and mean-semideviation models. Mathematical Programming, 89:217–232, 2001.
Z. Pawlak. Rough Sets – Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1991.
K.R. Popper. Objective Knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1972.
W.V. Quine. Two dogmas of empiricism. In P. Benacerraf and H. Putnam, editors, Philosophy of Mathematics, pages 346–365. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1953.
J. Rawls. A Theory of Justice. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA, 1971.
F. Ruiz, M. Luque, and J.M. Cabello. The weight factor in reference point procedures: From objective normalization to subjective information. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60:544–553, 2009.
T. Saaty. Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World. Lifetime Learning Publications, Belmont, CA, 1982.
J. Tian, A.P. Wierzbicki, H. Ren, and Y. Nakamori. A study on knowledge creation support in a Japanese research institute. In Proceedings of First International Conference on Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (KSEM06), pages 405–417. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006.
A.P. Wierzbicki. On the completeness and constructiveness of parametric characterizations to vector optimization problems. OR Spektrum, 8:73–87, 1986.
A.P. Wierzbicki. Technology and change – the role of technology in knowledge civilization. In J. Gu and G. Chroust, editors, Proceedings of the First World Congress of the International Federation for Systems Research. Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (JAIST), Nomi, Japan, 2005.
A.P. Wierzbicki. Reference point approaches and objective ranking. Seminar report, Schloss Dagstuhl Seminar 06501 – Practical Approaches to Multi-Objective Optimization, 2006. http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2007/1121/pdf/06501.WirzbickiAndrzej.Paper.1121.pdf.
A.P. Wierzbicki, J. Granat, and M. Makowski. Discrete decision problems with large numbers of criteria. Working paper, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria. http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/PUB/Documents/IR-07-025.pdf.
A.P. Wierzbicki, M. Makowski, and J. Wessels. Model-Based Decision Support Methodology with Environmental Applications. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2000.
A.P. Wierzbicki and Y. Nakamori. The episteme of knowledge civilization. International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Sciences, 4:8–20, 2007.
A.P. Wierzbicki and Y. Nakamori, editors. Creative Environments: Creativity Support for the Knowledge Civilization Age. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007.
R.R. Yager. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 18:183–190, 1988.
P.L. Yu. A class of solutions for group decision problems. Management Science, 19: 936–946, 1973.
P.L. Yu. Forming Winning Strategies, An Integrated Theory of Habitual Domains. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1990.
M. Zeleny. A concept of compromise solutions and the method of displaced ideal. Computers and Operations Research, 1:479–496, 1974.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wierzbicki, A.P. (2010). The Need for and Possible Methods of Objective Ranking. In: Ehrgott, M., Figueira, J., Greco, S. (eds) Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 142. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5904-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5904-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5903-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-5904-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)