Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Metacognition and Reading Comprehension: Age and Gender Differences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research

Abstract

This chapter presents an overview of the authors’ work on age differences in children’s metacognition and reading comprehension during upper elementary and high school (9–17-years old) in Croatia, with an emphasis on gender differences. The focus was placed on upper elementary school as a crucial period for the development of metacognition in the domain of reading comprehension. In the first and the second part we draw on the literature supporting the developmental effects on metacognition and reading skill, as well as gender differences in reading comprehension. In the third part the results of several studies conducted by the authors are presented, followed by discussion on obtained age and gender differences. The findings indicated that the importance of metacognition for text comprehension intensified with age with a noticeable increase in this effect in the transition from lower to upper elementary school (after about 10 years of age). However, metacognition also played an important role in reading comprehension during high school. The pattern of age differences varied across components of metacognition. The effect of gender on metacognition in reading was mainly evident from the better performance of girls on the comprehension monitoring tasks. Finally, implications for education are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ainley, M., Hillman, K., & Hidi, S. (2002). Gender and interest processes in response to literary texts: situational and individual interest. Learning and Instruction 12, 411–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander P. A., Graham, S., & Harris K. R. (1998). A perspective on strategy research: Progress and prospects. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 129–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alloway, N., Freebody, P., Gilbert, P., & Muspratt, P. (2002). Boys, literacy and schooling: Expanding the repertoires of practice. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. H., & Ambruster, B. B. (1984). Studying. In P. D. Pearson, M. Kamil, R. Barr, & P. Rosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1., pp. 353–395). White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, L. (1984). Spontaneous versus instructed use of multiple standards for evaluating comprehension: Effects of age, reading proficiency, and type of standard. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 289–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, L. (2005). Developmental differences in metacognition: Implication for metacognitively oriented reading instruction. In S. E. Israel, C. C. Block, K. L. Bauserman, & K. Kinnucan-Welsch (Eds.), Metacognition in literacy learning: Theory, assessment, instruction, and professional development (pp. 61–79). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, L., & Brown, A. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson, M. Kamil, R. Barr, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1., pp. 657–679). White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, M., Yule, W., & Rutter, M. (1975). Attainment and adjustment in two geographical areas: II. The prevalence of specific reading retardation. British Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 510–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, M. M., & McBride-Chang, C. (2006). Gender, context, and reading: A comparison of students in 43 countries. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 331–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, K. A., Liederman, J., Daly, L., & Schultz, J. (2000). Male prevalence for reading disability is found in a large sample of Black and White children free from ascertainment bias. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6, 433–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. A. (1993). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, N. (1999). Bilingualism, writing, and metalinguistic awareness: Oral-literate interactions between first and second languages. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 533–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R., & Taylor, N. (1982). Monitoring and understanding: An ivestigation of attentional assistance needs at different grade and proficiency levels. Reading Psychology, 3, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R., & Kraus, C. (1982). Good and poor comprehenders’ differences in knowing and regulating reading behavious. Educational Reading Quarterly, 6, 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, M., & Mann, S. (1984). A technique for the assessment and training of comprehension monitoring skills. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habib, M. (2000). The neurological basis of developmental dyslexia: An overview and working hypothesis. Brain, 123, 2373–2399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolić-Vehovec, S. (2002a). Self-monitoring and attribution training with poor readers. Studia Psychologica, 44, 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolić-Vehovec, S. (2002b). Effects of self-monitoring training on reading accuracy and fluency of poor readers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 17, 129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolić-Vehovec, S., & Bajšanski, I. (2001). Konstrukcija upitnika strategijskog čitanja [The construction of Strategic Reading Questionnaire]. Psihologijske Teme, 10, 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolić-Vehovec, S., & Bajšanski, I. (2003). Children’s metacognition as a predictor of reading comprehension. In G. Shiel & U. Ni Dhalaigh (Eds.), Other ways of seeing: Diversity in language and literacy (pp. 216–222). Dublin: Reading Association of Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolić-Vehovec, S., & Bajšanski, I. (2006a). Dobne i spolne razlike u nekim vidovima metakognicije i razumijevanja pri čitanju [Age and gender differences in some aspects of metacognition and reading comprehension]. Društvena Istraživanja, 15, 1005–1027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolić-Vehovec, S., & Bajšanski, I. (2006b). Metacognitive strategies and reading comprehension in elementary school students. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21, 439–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolić-Vehovec, S., & Bajšanski, I. (2007). Comprehension monitoring and reading comprehension in bilingual students. Journal of Research in Reading, 30, 198–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolić-Vehovec, S., & Muranović, E. (2004). Evaluacija treninga recipročnog poučavanja strategija čitanja [Evaluation of reciprocal teaching training of reading strategies]. Suvremena Psihologija, 7, 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolić-Vehovec, S., Pečjak, S., Ajdišek, N. & Rončević, B. (2008). Razlike med spoloma v (meta)kognitivnih in motivacijsko emocionalnih dejavnikih bralnega razumevanja [Gender differences in (meta)cognitive, emotional and motivational factors of reading comprehension]. Psihološka Obzorja, 17, 89–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolić-Vehovec, S., Pečjak, S., & Rončević Zubković, B. (2009). Spolne razlike u (meta)kognitivnim i motivacijskim čimbenicima razumijevanja teksta adolescenata u Hrvatskoj i Sloveniji [Gender differences in (meta)cognitive and motivational factors of text comprehension in adolescent in Croatia and Slovenia]. Suvremena Psihologija, 12, 229–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 178–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lietz, P. (2006). A meta-analysis of gender differences in reading achievement at the secondary school level. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32, 317–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malicky, G. V., Juliebo, M. F., Norman, C. A., & Pool, J. (1997). Scaffolding of metacognition in intervention lessons. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 43, 114–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, J., Veenman, M. V. J., & van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2006). Metacognitive activities in text-studying and problem-solving: Development of a taxonomy. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 209–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M., & Paris, S. G. (1978). Children’s metacognitive knowledge about reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 680–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakhill, J. V., & Petrides, A. (2007). Sex differences in the effects of interest on boys’ and girls’ reading comprehension. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 223–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Executive summary. Retrieved July 11, 2008, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/15/13/39725224.pdf

  • Paris, S. G, Cross, D. R., & Lipson, M. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children’s reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1239–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G., & DeBruin-Parecki, A. D. (1999). Metacognitive aspects of literacy. In D. Wagner, R. Venezky, & B. Street (Eds.), Literacy: An international handbook (pp. 74–80). Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G., & Myers, M. (1981). Comprehension monitoring in good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G., Wasik, B. A., & Turner, J. C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 609–639). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pazzaglia, F., De Beni, R., & Caccio, L. (1999). The role of working memory and metacognition in reading comprehension difficulties. In T. E. Scruggs, & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 13, pp. 115–134). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pazzaglia, F., De Beni R., & Cristante, F. (1994). Prova di metacompresione. [Metacomprehension test]. Firenze, Italia: Organizzazioni Speciali.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pečjak, S., Kolić-Vehovec, S., Rončević Zubković, B., & Ajdišek, N. (2009). (Meta)kognitivni i motivacijski prediktori razumijevanja teksta adolescenata u Hrvatskoj i Sloveniji [(Meta)cognitive and motivational predictors of text comprehension of adolescents in Croatia and Slovenia]. Suvremena Psihologija, 12, 257–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M. (1995). More about the development of self-regulation: Complex, long term, and thoroughly social. Educational Psychologist, 30, 207–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeschl-Heils, A., Schneider, W., & van Kraayenoord, C. E. (2003). Reading, metacognition and motivation: A follow-up study of German students in grades 7 and 8. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18, 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rončević Zubković, B. (2008). Uloga radnog pamćenja i strategijskog procesiranja u razumijevanju pri čitanju kod djece [The role of working memory and strategic processing in children’s reading comprehension]. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Zagreb, Croatia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M., Caspi, A., Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., Goodman, R., Maughan, B., Moffitt, T. E., Meltzer, H., & Carroll, J. (2004). Gender differences in reading difficulties: Findings from four epidemiology studies. Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 2007–2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauver, J. L., Katusic, S. K., Barbaresi, W. J., Colligan, R. C., & Jacobsen, S. J. (2001). Boy/girl differences in risk for reading disability: Potential clues? American Journal of Epidemiology, 154, 787–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., & Sodian, B. (1997). Memory strategy development: Lessons from longitudinal research. Developmental Review, 17, 442–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., & Alexander, J. (1997). Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning disabled and skilled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 128–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kraayenoord, C. E., & Schneider, W. (1999). Reading achievement, metacognition, reading self-concept and interest: A study of German students in grades 3 and 4. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 305–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M. V. J., & Spaans, M. A. (2005). Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M. V. J., Wilhelm, P., & Beishuizen, J. J. (2004). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective. Learning and Instruction, 14, 89–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walczyk, J. J. (1994). The development of verbal efficiency, metacognitive strategies, and their interplay. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walczyk, J. J., Wei, M., Grifith-Ross, D. A., Goubert, S. E., Cooper, A. L., & Zha, P. (2007). Development of the interplay between automatic processes and cognitive resources in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 867–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H. (1996). A metacognitive view of individual differences in self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 327–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, P., & Johnston, P. (1980). Comprehension monitoring and the error detection paradigm. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14, 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 64–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Rijeka, Croatia, Slavka Krautzeka b.b, 51000, Rijeka, Croatia

    Svjetlana Kolić-Vehovec

Authors
  1. Svjetlana Kolić-Vehovec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Igor Bajšanski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Barbara Rončević Zubković
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Svjetlana Kolić-Vehovec .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, 541 24, Greece

    Anastasia Efklides

  2. Dept. Primary Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, 451, Greece

    Plousia Misailidi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kolić-Vehovec, S., Bajšanski, I., Zubković, B.R. (2010). Metacognition and Reading Comprehension: Age and Gender Differences. In: Efklides, A., Misailidi, P. (eds) Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6546-2_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation