Skip to main content

University Teachers Engaged in Critical Self-Regulation: How May They Influence Their Students?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research

Abstract

We outline a new model for teacher learning, critical self-regulation (CSR). CSR is an aspirational model for the reflective processes that can underpin continuing professional development of university teachers. We propose a four-phase model of CSR that draws on the student learning literatures of metacognition and self-regulated learning (SRL), and critical reflection from adult education. To Zimmerman’s three-phase model of SRL, we add a prior stage that includes teachers’ reflection on the basic premises of their instruction and consideration of higher-order instructional goals. At the appraisal end of the process, the evaluation phase of SRL is extended to incorporate critical (or premise) reflection. We argue that critical reflection provides a qualitatively different and a deeper reflection than the reflection referred to in existing metacognition and SRL models. Following the presentation of the model of CSR, situations and tools for developing CSR are considered. We focus on learning that arises because of the perceived need by the teacher to address some learning or teaching dilemma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baker, L., & Cerro, L. C. (2000). Assessing metacognition in children and adults. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 99–145). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrie, S. C. (2007). A conceptual framework for the teaching and learning of generic graduate attributes. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 439–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartimote-Aufflick, K., & Brew, A. (2008, May). University teachers’ understanding of their own learning, 3rd Meeting of EARLI SIG 16: Metacognition. Ioannina, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartimote-Aufflick, K., & Smith, L. (2008, July). Developing as academics through participation in learning communities, Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA) Conference. Rotorua, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 199–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self assessment. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22, 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). What is reflection in learning? In D. Boud, R. Keogh, & D. Walker (Eds.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning (pp. 7–17). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brew, A. (2006). Research and teaching: Beyond the divide. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 77–165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1994). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 23, 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. L., Novak Lauscher, H., Jarvis-Selinger, S., & Beckingham, B. (2004). Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 435–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornford, I. R. (2002). Learning-to-learn strategies as a basis for effective lifelong learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 21, 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corno, L. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 179–212). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranton, P., & Wright, B. (2008). The transformative educator as learning companion. Journal of Transformative Education, 6, 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, D., & Kuhn, D. (2007). Direct instruction vs. discovery: The long view. Science Education, 91, 384–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13, 277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1996). The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instructional Science, 24, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, S. C., Dembo, M. H., & Hocevar, D. (2007). Do teachers’ own learning behaviors influence their classroom goal orientation and control ideology? Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, W. K. (2001). The pupil control studies. A historical, theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 39, 424–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, P., & Shulman, L. S. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments. Change, 31, 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramarski, B. (2008). Promoting teachers’ algebraic reasoning and self-regulation with metacognitive guidance. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreber, C. (2000). Becoming an expert university teacher: A self-directed process. In H. B. Long (Ed.), Practice and theory in self-directed learning (pp. 131–142). Schaumburg, IL: Motorola University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreber, C. (2004). An analysis of two models of reflection and their implications for educational development. International Journal for Academic Development, 9, 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreber, C. (2005a). Charting a critical course on the scholarship of university teaching movement. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 389–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreber, C. (2005b). Reflection on teaching and the scholarship of teaching: Focus on science instructors. Higher Education, 50, 323–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreber, C., & Cranton, P. A. (2000). Exploring the scholarship of teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 476–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, X., Schwartz, D. L., & Hatano, G. (2005). Toward teachers’ adaptive metacognition. Educational Psychologist, 40, 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg, L.-E. (2008). Student teachers’ achievement goal orientations during teacher studies: Antecedents, correlates and outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 18, 438–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsick, V., & Mezirow, J. (2002). New work on transformative learning, ID Number: 10876, Teachers College Record: http://www.tcrecord.org.

  • Masui, C., & De Corte, E. (2005). Learning to reflect and to attribute constructively as basic components of self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 351–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine, L., Berdugo Oviedo, G., & Emrick, A. (2008). Telling the second half of the story: Linking academic development to student experience of learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 661–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine, L., Weston, C., & Beauchamp, C. (2002). Debriefing interview and colloquium: How effective are these as research strategies? Instructional Science, 30, 403–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine, L., Weston, C., Berthiaume, D., Fairbank-Roch, G., & Owen, M. (2004). Reflection on teaching: Types and goals of reflection. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10, 337–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1990). Preface. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Fostering critical reflection in adulthood (pp. xiii–xxi). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozmon, H., & Craver, S. (1990). Philosophical foundations of education (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G. (2002). When is metacognition helpful, debilitating, or benign? In P. Chambres, M. Izaute, & P.-J. Marescaux (Eds.), Metacognition: Process, function and use (pp. 105–120). Boston: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G., & Cunningham, A. (1996). Children becoming students. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 117–147). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36, 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory into Practice, 41, 219–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postareff, L., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2008). Variation in teachers’ description of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 18, 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers, W. T. (1973). Behavior: The control of perception. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (2006). Confrimatory factor analysis of the approaches to teaching inventory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 405–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randi, J. (2004). Teachers as self-regulated learners. Teachers College Record, 106, 1825–1853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randi, J., & Corno, L. (2000). Teacher innovations in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 651–686). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Guterman, E. (1989). The computer as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading-related metacognitions from a reading partner. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 620–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, M., & Betts, J. (2007). Crossing the threshold from description to deconstruction and reconstruction: Using self-assessment to deepen reflection. Reflective Practice, 8, 269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1995). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (New ed.). Aldershot, UK: Arena, Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 631–650). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of intentions in conceptual change learning. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 1–18). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillema, H. H., & Kremer-Hayon, L. (2002). “Practising what we preach” – Teacher educators’ dilemmas in promoting self-regulated learning: A cross case comparison. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 593–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Ginns, P. (2005). Phenomenographic pedagogy and a revised approaches to teaching inventory. Higher Education Research and Development, 24, 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eekelen, I. M., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Vermunt, J. D. (2005). Self-regulation in higher education teacher learning. Higher Education, 50, 447–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Original work published 1930).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (2000). Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attributional perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston, C. B., & McAlpine, L. (2001). Making explicit the development toward the scholarship of teaching and learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 86, 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamorski, B. (2002). Research-led teaching and learning in higher education: A case. Teaching in Higher Education, 7, 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–40). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Sociocultural influence and students’ development of academic self-regulation: A social-cognitive perspective. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning: Vol. 4. Big theories revisited. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process goals to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1999). Acquiring writing revision skill: Shifting from process to outcome self-regulatory goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 241–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, A. (2004). Elements of teachers’ pedagogical knowledge regarding instruction of higher order thinking. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15, 293–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, A. (2006). The nature and development of teachers’ metastrategic knowledge in the context of teaching higher order thinking. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 331–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, A., & Ben David, A. (2008). Explicit teaching of meta-strategic knowledge in authentic classroom situations. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This chapter draws on a presentation given at the EARLI Metacognition SIG Conference in Ioannina, Greece (Bartimote-Aufflick & Brew, 2008).

Thanks to the reviewer for the feedback, and to Anastasia Efklides for helpful comments on the draft.

Kathryn Bartimote-Aufflick is Lecturer at the Institute for Teaching and Learning, the University of Sydney, Australia. Angela Brew is Professorial Fellow at the Learning and Teaching Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. Mary Ainley is Associate Professor at the Department of Psychology, the University of Melbourne, Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn Bartimote-Aufflick .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bartimote-Aufflick, K., Brew, A., Ainley, M. (2010). University Teachers Engaged in Critical Self-Regulation: How May They Influence Their Students?. In: Efklides, A., Misailidi, P. (eds) Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6546-2_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics