Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Loudness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Loudness

Part of the book series: Springer Handbook of Auditory Research ((SHAR,volume 37))

Abstract

The topic of loudness is no longer something esoteric, discussed only in research laboratories and psychoacoustics lectures. It is mainstream in social conversation, and most people have developed an opinion about some aspect of loudness. Our daily environments are too loud and people are taking notice. In their book, One Square Inch of Silence, Hempton and Grossmann (2009) document the lack of quiet places. The fact that a book about this topic can be published by Free Press, a division of Simon and Schuster, and appear on bookshelves – from Barnes and Noble to WalMart and Sam’s Club – indicates that problems associated with loud sounds strike a resonant chord with a large segment of the population. Loud sounds intrude on our enjoyment of life and affect our performance; loud background sounds interfere with our ability to hear sounds we want to hear and can create communication problems for everyone, especially those with hearing losses (Chap. 9), children (Nelson et al. 2002), older adults (Kim et al. 2006), and non-native speakers of a language (e.g., Mayo et al. 1997; Lecumberri and Cooke 2006; Van Engen and Bradlow 2007). These combined groups add up to be a significant portion of the overall population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ANSI-S3.4 (2007) American National Standard Procedure for the Computation of Loudness of Steady Sounds. New York: American National Standards Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appell JE, Hohmann V, Kollmeier B (2001) Review of loudness models for normal and hearing-impaired listeners based on the model proposed by Zwicker. Z Audiol 40:140–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelsson A, Eliasson A, Israelsson, B (1995) Hearing in pop/rock musicians: a follow-up study. Ear Hear 16:245–253.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund B, Berglund U, Lindvall T (1976) Scaling loudness, noisiness, and annoyance of community noises. J Acoust Soc Am 60:1119–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buus S (2002) Psychophysical methods and other factors that affect the outcome of psychoacoustic measurements. In: Tranebjærg L, Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Andersen T, Poulsen T (eds), Genetics and the Function of the Auditory System: Proceedings of the 19th Danavox Symposium. Copenhagen, Denmark: Holmens Trykkeri, The Danavox Jubilee Foundation, ISBN 87–982422–9–6, pp. 183–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buus S, Klump GM, Gleich O, Langemann U (1995) An excitation-pattern model for the starling (Sturnus vulgaris). J Acoust Soc Am 98:112–124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buus S, Florentine M, Poulsen T (1997) Temporal integration of loudness, loudness discrimination, and the form of the loudness function. J Acoust Soc Am 101:669–680.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buus S, Müsch H, Florentine M (1998) On loudness at threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 104:399–410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delgutte B (1996) Physiological models for basic auditory percepts. In: Hawkins HL, McMullen TA, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds), Auditory Computation. New York: Springer, pp. 157–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein M, Florentine M (2009) Binaural loudness summation for speech and tones presented via earphones and loudspeakers. Ear Hear 30:234–237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein M, Marozeau J (2010) Loudness and intensity coding. In: Plack, C (ed), OUPHAS Auditory Perception. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 45–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fastl H, Zwicker E (2007) Psychoacoustics – Facts and Models, 3rd ed. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florentine M (1990) Education as a tool to prevent noise-induced hearing loss. Hear Instrum 41:33–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florentine M (2009) Advancements in psychophysics lead to a new understanding of loudness in normal hearing and hearing loss. In: Elliott MA, Antonijevic’ S, Berthaud S, Mulcahy P, Martyn C, Bargery B, Schmidt H, Fechner Day 2009 Proceedings of the 25 Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics. Galway: Snap Printing, pp. 83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florentine M, Buus S (1981) An excitation-pattern model for intensity discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 70:1646–1654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florentine M, Heinz MG (2009) Audition: Loudness. In: Goldstein EB, Encyclopedia of Perception, Sage Publications Ltd. London. EC1Y 1SP Vol. 1, Sage, pp. 145–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florentine M, Zwicker E (1979) A model of loudness summation applied to noise-induced hearing loss. Hear Res 1:121–132.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Florentine M, Buus S, Bonding P (1978) Loudness of complex sounds as a function of the standard stimulus and the number of components. J Acoust Soc of Am 64:1036–1040.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Florentine M, Buus S, Scharf B, Zwicker E (1980) Frequency selectivity in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired observers. J Speech Hear Res 23:113–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florentine M, Namba S, Kuwano S (1986) Concepts of loudness, noisiness, noise, and annoyance in the USA, Japan and England. Proc Inter-Noise 2:831–834

    Google Scholar 

  • Florentine M, Buus S, Hellman R (1997) A model of loudness summation applied to high-frequency hearing loss. In: Jesteadt W (ed), Modeling Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum, pp.187–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates GA, Schmid P, Kujawa SG, Nam B, D’Agnostino R (2000) Longitudinal threshold changes in older men with audiometric notches. Hear Res 141:220–228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein JL (1974) Is the power law simply related to the driven spike response rate from the whole auditory nerve? In Moskowitz HR, Scharf B, Stevens SS (eds), Sensation and Measurement. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 223–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz MG, Young ED (2004) Response growth with sound level in auditory-nerve fibers after noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurophysiol 91:784–795.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heinz MG, Issa JB, Young ED (2005) Auditory-nerve rate responses are inconsistent with common hypotheses for the neural correlates of loudness recruitment. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 6:91–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hempton G, Grossmann J (2009) One Square Inch of Silence. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 1999 (1990) Acoustics – Determination of occupational noise exposure and estimation of noise-induced hearing impairment. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SH, Frisina RD, Mapes FM, Hickman ED, Frisina DR (2006) Effect of age on binaural speech intelligibility in normal hearing adults. Speech Commun 48:591–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochkin S (2005) Marketrak VII: Hearing loss population tops 31 million people. Hear Rev 12:16–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kujawa SG, Liberman MC (2006) Acceleration of age-related hearing loss by early noise exposure: evidence of a misspent youth. J Neurosci 26:2115–2123.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kujawa SG, Liberman MC (2009) Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci 29:14077–14085.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuwano S, Namba S (1985) Continuous judgment of level-fluctuating sounds and the relationship between overall loudness and instantaneous loudness. Psychol Res 47:27–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuwano S, Namba S, Hashimoto T, Berglund B, Zheng D, Schick A, Höge H, Florentine M (1991) Emotional expression of noise: a cross-cultural study. J Sound Vib 151:421–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuwano S, Namba S, Florentine M, Zheng DR, Hashimoto T (1992) Factor analysis of the timbre of noise – comparison of the data obtained in three different laboratories Proc Acoust Soc Jpn N92–4–3:559–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecumberri MLG, Cooke M (2006) Effect of masker type on native and non-native consonant perception in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 119:2445–2454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marozeau J, Florentine M (2007) Loudness growth in individual listeners with hearing losses: A review. J Acoust Soc Am 122: EL81–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • May BJ, Little N, Saylor S (2009) Loudness perception in the domestic cat: reaction time estimates of equal loudness contours and recruitment effects. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 10:295–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayo LFH, Florentine M, Buus S (1997) Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res 40:686–693.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR, Hess RF, Birchall JP (1985) Effects of flanking noise bands on the rate of growth of loudness of tones in normal and recruiting ears. J Acoust Soc Am 77:1505–1513.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Namba S, Kuwano S, Schick A (1986) The measurement of meaning of loudness, noisiness, and annoyance in different countries. In: Proc Int Cong Acoust, pp. C1–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namba S, Kuwano S, Schick A, Aclar A, Florentine M, Zheng D (1991) A cross-cultural study on noise problems: a comparison of the results obtained in Japan, West Germany, the USA, China and Turkey. J Sound Vib 151:471–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson PB, Soli SD, Seltz A (2002) Classroom Acoustics II: Acoustical Barriers to Learning. Melville, NY: Acoustical Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood CE, Suci G, Tannenbaum P (1957) The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxenham AJ, Buus S (2000) Level discrimination of sinusoids as a function of duration and level for fixed-level, roving level, and across-frequency conditions. J Acoust Soc Am 107:1605–1614.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen OJ, Lyregaard PE, Poulsen T (1977) The Round Robin Test on Evaluation of Loudness Level of Impulsive Noise: Report no. 22. Technical University of Denmark: Acoustics Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfingst BE, Hienz R, Kimm J, Miller J (1975) Reaction-time procedure for measurement of hearing. I. Suprathreshold functions. J Acoust Soc Am 57:421–430.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pickles JO (1983) Auditory-nerve correlates of loudness summation with stimulus bandwidth in normal and pathological cochlea. Hear Res 12:239–250.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pickles JO (2008) An Introduction to the Physiology of Hearing, 3rd ed. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plack CJ (2005) The Sense of Hearing. New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plack CJ, Carlyon RP (1995) Loudness perception and intensity coding. In: Moore BCJ (ed), Hearing. London: Academic Press, pp. 123–160.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Relkin EM, Doucet JR (1997) Is loudness simply proportional to the auditory nerve spike count? J Acoust Soc Am 101: 2735– 2740.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Royster JD, Royster LH, Killion MD (1991) Sound exposure and hearing thresholds of symphony orchestra musicians. J Acoust Soc Am 89:2792–2803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer RM (1977) The Tuning of the World. Toronto: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharf B (1964) Partial masking. Acustica 14:17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharf B (1978) Loudness. In: Catrerette EC, Friedman MP (Eds.), Handbook of Perception: IV. Hearing. New York: Academic Press, pp. 187–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharf B (1997) Loudness. In: Crocker MJ, Encyclopedia of Acoustic: III. New York: Wiley, pp. 1481–1495.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schick A, Höge H (1996) Cross-cultural psychoacoustics. In: Fastl H, Kuwano S, Schick A, Recent Trends in Hearing Research: Bibliotheks-und Informations-system der Universität Oldenburg. University of Oldenburg Press, pp. 287–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins WC (1966) Auditory reaction time and the derivation of equal loudness contours for the monkey. J Exp Anal Behav 9:135–142.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins WC, Miller JM (1964) Reaction time as a function of stimulus intensity for the monkey. J Exp Anal Behav 7:309–312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens SS (1934) The attributes of tones. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 20:457–459.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson E (2002) The Soundscape of Modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Engen KJ, Bradlow AR (2007) Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise. J Acoust Soc Am 121:519–526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner E, Florentine M, Buus S, McCormack J (2004) Spectral loudness summation and simple reaction time. J Acoust Soc Am 116:1681–1686.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward LM (1987) Remembrance of sounds past: memory and psychophysical scaling. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perf 13:216–227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zahorik P, Wightman FL (2001) Loudness constancy with varying sound source distance. Nat Neurosci 4:78–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology with joint appointment in Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    Mary Florentine

Authors
  1. Mary Florentine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Florentine .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Dept. Speech-Language Pathology & Audiol, Northeastern University, Boston, 02115, Massachusetts, USA

    Mary Florentine

  2. , Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742, USA

    Arthur N Popper

  3. Parmly Hearing Institute, Loyola University Chicago, 6525 N. Sheridan Rd., Chicago, 60626, Illinois, USA

    Richard R. Fay

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Florentine, M. (2011). Loudness. In: Florentine, M., Popper, A., Fay, R. (eds) Loudness. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, vol 37. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6712-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation