Skip to main content

“To Such as These, the Kingdom of Heaven Belongs”: Religious Faith as a Foundation for Children’s Rights

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Child's Right to a Healthy Environment

Part of the book series: The Loyola University Symposium on the Human Rights of Children ((LUSY,volume 1))

Abstract

When the topic of religion enters discourse on children’s rights, all too often it is to lament the influence of certain religions on the status and well-being of children. At worst, there is concern that participation in religious life may directly place children at risk of harm. As is well known to the general public, some religious denominations have accrued huge liabilities as a result of sexual abuse of children by clergy and others in religious occupations (Associated Press, 2005). At the time of the symposium from which this book developed, cable news cameras were focused nearly around the clock on the compound of a polygamist sect in Texas from which hundreds of children were placed in emergency custody of the state. The Texas case was a variation on long-standing concerns about religious communities with unconventional sexual mores and child-rearing practices (Lilliston, 1997) or even satanic rituals (Goodman et al., 1997).

1 Matthew 19:14; see also Luke 18:15–17, Mark 10:13–16, and Matthew 18:1–5.

2 Reflecting the Jesuit underpinnings of the center that sponsored the symposium on which this book is based and the largely Protestant communities in which Strong Communities for Children (discussed at some length in this chapter) is located, the examples in this chapter predominantly reflect Christian traditions. However, most of the arguments and conclusions apply with equal force to other great religions, which in varying degrees share values of compassion, justice, and neighborly love, particularly in relation to children. (For primary source materials and commentary on beliefs about childhood in Buddhism, Christianity, Confucianism, Hinduism, Islam, and Judaism, see Browning & Bunge, 2009.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Subsequently, one study (Kim, 2008) documented possible protective effects of religiosity on the mental health of maltreated children in low-income families (specifically, lower frequency of internalizing symptoms among girls, and lower frequency of externalizing symptoms among boys). However, this study (see also Holmes, 2008) also did not address organizational activities of churches and other faith-based organizations to mitigate the harm of child abuse and neglect or to prevent it altogether.

  2. 2.

    Using the term “children’s rights”, a Google search of the Eagle Forum’s Web site (http://www.eagleforum.org) on September 1, 2009, yielded 112 documents. The general tone is illustrated by the first document appearing in the search: The New World Order Wants Your Children.

  3. 3.

    Consider, e.g., the following juxtaposition of rights on the Web site of Focus on the Family:

    Danger seems to be everywhere, even generating new buzzwords. Terrorism is a buzzword that has come into common use only in the past few years. Other common buzzwords [of the contemporary era] include rights , access, gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, binge, purge, chat rooms, morning-after pill, body art, piercing, cutting, X, Meth, date-rape drugs, crack-baby, huffing, parental consent and many additional slang words used for various sexual behaviors.

    (Klepacki, n.d., ¶ 8, emphasis added)

  4. 4.

    The mismatch in this instance between factual accuracy on the one hand and media messages and public beliefs on the other is directly analogous to the “stranger danger” or the “culture of fear” in relation to child abduction (Glassner, 2000).

  5. 5.

    The list also includes at least the following: Adventist; Bahai; Baptist World Alliance Council; Buddhist; Greek Orthodox; Salvation Army; United Church of Christ; National Council of Churches; Young Men’s and Young Women’s Christian Associations (U.S. Committee for UNICEF, n.d.).

  6. 6.

    See also Garbarino (2009): “Children have human rights because each of us is one of God’s Children, and thus beyond the authority of human beings and institutions that may wish to use or degrade us” (p. 4).

    For a similar perspective, see Vailaau (2009), who provides a Christian theology of childhood, amplified by an exposition of Samoan cultural norms and values. Vailaau is particularly pointed in his analysis of the prohibition of corporal punishment, currently a hot issue in New Zealand, among scores of other countries. Noting that many believe erroneously that the Old Testament commands physically assaultive punishment of children, Vailaau (2009, p. 10) makes the powerful argument that “it is hard to conceive of Jesus ever hitting a child for any reason. The very suggestion is contradictory both to what He taught and the way He lived.”

  7. 7.

    “What are human beings that you are mindful of them, mortals that you care for them? Yet you have made them a little lower than God [or divine beings, or angels] and crowned them with glory and honor.”

    On the same point, the UMC statement also cited Genesis 1:27 (adapted): “God created human beings, in the image of God they were created....”

  8. 8.

    Of course, the Jesuit order has been especially engaged in the promotion of social justice (Society of Jesus in the United States, 2009), a tradition that is reflected in the center (and the university of which it is a part) that sponsored the symposium on which this book is based.

  9. 9.

    A particularly noteworthy example is Istituto degli Innocenti (2007), usually regarded as the first residential care facility for children and appropriately located on Piazza della Santissima Annunziata, the setting in Florence, Italy, for veneration of the Virgin Mary. Today (more than 600 years after its establishment) Istituto degli Innocenti is the home of UNICEF’s primary research center, a related Italian governmental research center, and various services for children.

  10. 10.

    Catholic theology about justice for children has been heavily influenced by the work of Karl Rahner (see Hinsdale, 2001, for an analysis, with accompanying commentary by Bunge, 2001).

  11. 11.

    For an analysis of Jesus’s teachings about children, see Gundry-Volf (2001).

  12. 12.

    The power of the Christian version of the Golden Rule would have been greater if it were framed as a duty to act toward others as they would want.

  13. 13.

    For an example, see Jeremiah 29:4–8. Jeremiah preached that the Hebrews in exile in Babylon should not only form a community for themselves – building houses, planting gardens, establishing families – but, radically, that they should also pray for and in general promote the welfare of Babylon itself.

  14. 14.

    See also Matthew 25:34–35, 40:

    Come, you that are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink. I was a stranger and you welcomed me.... Truly I tell you, just as you did it to one of the least of these who are members of my family, you did it to me.

    Given the other passages in which Jesus referred to “the least of these” (see footnote 1 supra), this quote about Jesus’s prophecy in the Final Judgment can be read, as in other passages, to assert that failure to welcome a child – or someone in another vulnerable group – would be tantamount to excluding Jesus himself.

  15. 15.

    In a speech at the United Nations in 1958 (quoted by Lash, 1972), Eleanor Roosevelt, the mother of international human rights law, eloquently expressed the importance of conceptualizing the fulfillment of human rights (whether for children or other people) as a matter of everyday life:

    Where, after all, do universal human rights begin? In small places, close to home – so close and so small they cannot be seen on any maps of the world. Yet they are the world of the individual person; the neighborhood he lives in, the school or college he attends; the factory, farm, or office where he works. Such are the places where every man, woman, and child seeks equal justice, equal opportunity, equal dignity without discrimination. Unless these rights have meaning there, they have little meaning anywhere. Without concerted citizen action to uphold them close to home, we shall look in vain for progress in the larger world. (p. 79).

  16. 16.

    Nonetheless, the participants in Strong Communities included numerous congregations in mainstream Christian denominations and minority (non-Christian) religious traditions. The diversity of the religious beliefs represented in the initiative is illustrated by the project’s faculty and staff. The author himself is a member of a Unitarian Universalist fellowship. Most Unitarian Universalists today do not regard themselves as Christian, although the historic roots of the denomination are in Christianity. Drawing from multiple sources (including but by no means limited to Judeo-Christian texts), the UU faith is an excellent illustration of the broad spiritual foundation of respect for human rights. In fact, UUs’ first principle is “the inherent worth and dignity of every person” (Unitarian Universalist Association, 2009).

    Among the other religious traditions represented by faculty and staff in Strong Communities were agnostic, independent evangelical, Baptist (both Missionary Baptist and Southern Baptist), Catholic, Jewish, Presbyterian, Russian Orthodox, and United Methodist. Other traditions represented among the participating congregations included African Methodist Episcopal, Bahai, Church of Christ, Episcopal, Full Gospel, Lutheran, Pentecostal, and Wesleyan.

References

  • (1996–2009). The Catholic Church and sexual abuse by priests archive. Retrieved from http://www.americancatholic.org/News/ClergySexAbuse/.

  • A new network: Presbyterians in Covenant with Children. (n.d.). Retrieved September 14, 2009, from http://www.pcusa.org/children/covenant.htm.

  • Ackerman, B., & Alstott, A. (1999). The stakeholder society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Associated Press. (2005). Sex abuse scandals cost church $1 billion. Retrieved June 10, 2005, from http://www.TheState.com.

  • Barnett, R. (2005). Churches take steps to prevent sex abuse of kids. Retrieved March 13, 2005, from http://www.greenvilleonline.com.

  • Bennett, S. E. (1998, September). Young Americans’ indifference to media coverage of public affairs. PSOnline, pp. 535–541. (Available at http://www.apsanet.org).

  • Bice. (2009a). Bice: International Catholic Child Bureau [Web site]. Retrieved September 17, 2009, from http://www.biceinternational.org/index.php.

  • Bice. (2009b). World appeal to a new mobilization for childhood. Retrieved September 17, 2009, from http://www.biceinternational.org/ewb_pages/w/world-appeal-to-a-new-mobilization-for-childhood-geneva-june-2009.php.

  • Billingsley, A. (2002). Mighty like a river: The black church and social reform. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston Globe. (2004). Spotlight investigation: Abuse in the Catholic Church. Retrieved September 17, 2009, from http://www.boston.com/globe/spotlight/abuse/.

  • Brekus, C. A. (2001). Children of wrath, children of grace: Jonathan Edwards and the Puritan culture of child rearing. In M. J. Bunge (Ed.), The child in Christian thought (pp. 300–328). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, D. S., & Bunge, M. J. (2009). Children and childhood in world religions: Primary sources and texts. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryd, K. R., Hageman, A., & Isle, D. B. (2007). Intrinsic motivation and subjective well-being: The unique contribution of intrinsic religious motivation. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17, 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. J. (2001). Introduction. In M. J. Bunge (Ed.), The child in Christian thought (pp. 1–28). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campaign for U.S. Ratification of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. (2009). Partners. Retrieved from http://childrightscampaign.org/crcindex.php?sNav=about_snav.php&sDat=partners_dat.php.

  • Caritas Internationalis. (2009). Caritas.org. Retrieved from http://www.caritas.org.

  • Catholic Relief Services. (2009). Catholic relief services: Giving hope to a world of need. Retrieved from http://www.crs.org.

  • Chaves, M., Konieczny, M. E., Beyerlein, K., & Barman, E. (1999). The national congregations study: Background, methods, and selected results. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38, 458–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, M. M., & Brassard, J. A. (1979). Child development and personal social networks. Child Development, 50, 601–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Convention on the Rights of the Child. (1989). U.N. Doc. A/Res/44/25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, C. J., Crampton, D. S., Irwin, M., Spilsbury, J. C., & Korbin, J. E. (2007). How neighborhoods influence child maltreatment: A review of the literature and alternate pathways. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 1117–1142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decade of the Child. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.pcusa.org/children/about.htm.

  • Dobson, J. C. (2004). The new strong-willed child: Birth through adolescence. Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doll, L. S., Bonzo, S. E., Mercy, J. A., & Sleet, D. A. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of injury and violence prevention. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duxbury, N. (2008). Golden Rule reasoning, moral judgement and law. (John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper Series, No. 47). Charlottesville: University of Virginia, School of Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, P. F. (2001, February 5). How U.N. conventions on women’s and children’s rights undermine family, religion, and sovereignty. Heritage Foundation Backgrounder (Report No. 1407).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelhor, D. (2003). The legacy of the clergy abuse scandal. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27, 1225–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelhor, D., & Jones, L. (2006). Why have child maltreatment and child victimization declined? Journal of Social Issues, 62, 685–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, R. M. (1997). Another day’s journey: Black churches confronting the American crisis. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, R. M. (2007). Crisis in the village: Restoring hope in African American communities. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1996). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press. (Originally published 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2000). The great disruption: Human nature and the reconstitution of the social order. New York: Touchstone. (Originally published 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, J. (1995). Growing up in a socially toxic environment: Life for children and families in the 1990s. In G. B. Melton (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (The individual, the family, and social good: Personal fulfillment in times of change (pp, Vol. 42, pp. 1–20). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, J., & Kostelny, K. (1994). Neighborhood-based programs. In G. B. Melton & F. D. Barry (Eds.), Protecting children from abuse and neglect (pp. 304–352). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Convention, Episcopal Church. (2000). Children’s charter for the church. Adopted by Resolution 2000-D045 as “a continuing vision of The Episcopal Church’s ministry in nurturing children, ministering to and advocating on behalf of children, and supporting children in their ministries.” Retrieved from http://www.episcopalchurch.org/documents/Child_Charter_8.5x11.pdf.

  • General Assembly, Presbyterian Church (USA). (1993). A vision for children and the church. Retrieved from http://www.pcusa.org/phewa/childabusevision.htm.

  • General Conference, United Methodist Church. (2004). Globalization and its impact on human dignity and human rights. Resolution adopted in 2000 and amended and re-adopted in 2004. Retrieved from http://archives.umc.org/interior.asp?ptid+4&mid=1016.

  • Glassner, B. (2000). The culture of fear: Why Americans are afraid of the wrong things. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G. S., Quas, J. A., Bottoms, B. L., Qin, J., Shaver, P. R., Orcult, H., et al. (1997). Children’s religious knowledge: Implications for understanding satanic ritual allegations. Child Abuse & Neglect, 21, 1111–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundry-Volf, J. M. (2001). The least and the greatest: Children in the New Testament. In M. J. Bunge (Ed.), The child in Christian thought (pp. 29–60). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinsdale, M. A. (2001). “Infinite openness to the infinite”: Karl Rahner’s contribution to modern Catholic thought on the child. In M. J. Bunge (Ed.), The child in Christian thought (pp. 406–445). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, A. (2005). The simple faith of Mister Rogers: Spiritual insights from the world’s most beloved neighbor. Nashville: Integrity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, K. (2008). The roles of religion and spirituality in child maltreatment. [American Psychological Association] Section on Child Maltreatment Newsletter, 13(1), 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, D. (2004, January 6). On crime as science (a neighbor at a time). Retrieved November 27, 2009, from http://crab.rutgers.edu/∼goertzel/CollectiveEfficacyEarls.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Implementing a Children’s Charter for the Church: A study guide for congregations. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.episcopalchurch.org/documents/implementingcc.pdf.

  • Istituto degli Innocenti. (2007, April 2). The children’s Renaissance [News release]. Retrieved from http://www.istitutodeglinnocenti.it/notizia.jsf?idNot=568.

  • John Paul II. (1990, September 22). [Letter to Secretary General Javier Pérez de Cuellar on the occasion of the World Summit for Children.] Retrieved from http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/letters/1990/documents/hf_jp-ii_let_19900922_de-cuellar_en.html.

  • Johnson, D. (1992). Cultural and regional pluralism in the drafting of the U. N. Convention on the Rights of the Child. In M. D. A. Freeman & P. E. Veerman (Eds.), The ideologies of children’s rights (pp. 95–114). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamenetz, A. (2006). Generation debt: How our future was sold out for student loans, bad jobs, no benefits, and tax cuts for rich geezers – and how to fight back. New York: Riverhead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (2008). The protective effects of religiosity on maladjustment among maltreated and nonmaltreated children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 711–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klepacki, L. (n.d.). Dear Mom & Dad: Teach, instruct, discuss. Retrieved from http://www.citizenlink.org/FOSI/abstinence/parents/A000001024.cfm.

  • Lash, J. P. (1972). Eleanor: The years alone. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilliston, L. (1997). Children of communal new religious members: Psychosocial functioning. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 15, 57–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B. (Ed.). (1985). Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 33. The law as a behavioral instrument. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B. (1992). It’s time for neighborhood research and action. Child Abuse & Neglect, 16, 909–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B. (1996). The child’s right to a family environment: Why children’s rights and family values are compatible. The American Psychologist, 51, 1234–1238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melton, J. T. (1998). Safe sanctuaries: Reducing the risk of child abuse in the church. Nashville: Discipleship Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, J. T. (2003). Safe sanctuaries for youth: Reducing the risk of abuse in youth ministries. Nashville: Discipleship Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B. (2005). Building humane communities respectful of children: The significance of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. The American Psychologist, 60, 918–926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B. (2009). How Strong Communities restored my faith in humanity: Children can live in safety. In K. A. Dodge & D. L. Coleman (Eds.), Preventing child maltreatment: Community approaches (pp. 82–101). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B. (Ed.). (in prep.-a). Good neighbors: Safe and humane communities for children and families. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B. (Ed.). (in prep.-b). Strong communities: Community wide prevention of child abuse and neglect [Special section]. Child Abuse and Neglect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B., & Anderson, D. (2008). From safe sanctuaries to strong communities: The role of communities of faith in child protection. Family & Community Health, 31, 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B., & Barry, F. D. (Eds.). (1994). Protecting children from abuse and neglect: Foundations for a new national strategy. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B. & Holaday, B. J. (Eds.). (2008). Strong communities as safe havens for children [Special issue]. Family and Community Health, 31(2), 83–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, J. A. (2005). Welcoming children: A practical theology of childhood. Saint Louis: Chalice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (2007). Churches as change agents: Guidelines for child participation in periodic reporting of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Mississauga, Ontario: World Vision Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J. E. B., Berliner, L., Briere, J., Hendrix, C. T., Jenny, C., & Reid, T. A. (Eds.) (2002). The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newport, F. (2006, April 27). Church attendance lowest in New England, highest in South. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/22579/church-attendance-lowest-new-england-highest-south.aspx?version=print.

  • Office of Child Advocacy, Presbyterian Church (USA). (2009a, March 25–27). Update from Office of child advocacy. Report to the General Assembly Mission Council, Presbyterian Church (USA). Retrieved from http://www.pcusa.org/gamc/business/march09/information/200.pdf.

  • Office of Child Advocacy, Presbyterian Church (USA). (2009b, September 23–24). Update from Office of child advocacy. Report to the General Assembly Mission Council, Presbyterian Church (USA). Retrieved from http://www.pcusa.org/gamc/business/sept09/information/239.pdf.

  • Pargament, K. I. (1992). Of means and ends: Religion and the search for significance. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 201–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulson, M. (2006, April 8). Diocese progresses on child protection: Abuse board revision urged. Boston Globe, B1, B4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrucci, R., & Wysong, E. (1999). The new class society. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, C. (1999). Making room: Recovering hospitality as a Christian tradition. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popenoe, D. (1990). Family decline in America. In D. Blankenhorn, S. Bayme, & J. B. Elshtain (Eds.), Rebuilding the nest: A new commitment to the American family (pp. 39–51). Milwaukee: Family Service America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popenoe, D. (1993). American family decline, 1960–1990: A review and appraisal. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 527–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahn, W. M., & Transue, J. E. (1998). Social trust and value change: The decline of social capital in American youth, 1976–1995. Political Psychology, 19, 545–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Red Hand Day: the effort continues. (2009, February 12). Swords into plowshares: Reflections from the Presbyterian Peacemaking Program. Retrieved from http://presbyterian.typepad.com/peacemaking/2009/02/red-hand-day-the-effort-continues.html.

  • Resner, A., Jr. (2008). Just preaching: Prophetic voices for economic justice. Saint Louis: Chalice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riessman, F., & Carroll, D. (1995). Redefining self-help in the human services: Policy and practice. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehlkepartain, E. C. & Benson, P. L. (in press). Children, religion, and spiritual development: Reframing a research agenda. In A. Ben-Arieh, J. Cashmore, G. S. Goodman, & G. B. Melton (Eds.), Children in childhood: A research handbook. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighbors and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Society of Jesus in the United States. (2009). A faith that does justice. Retrieved September 17, 2009, from http://www.jesuit.org/SocialJustice/default.aspx.

  • Stout-Miller, R., Miller, L. S., & Langenbrunner, M. R. (1997). Religiosity and child sexual abuse: A risk factor assessment. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 6(4), 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. (1994). Beating the devil out of them: Corporal punishment in American families. New York: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. & McLeigh, J. (in press). “Bear one another’s burdens”: A church and a community in transformation. In G. B. Melton (Ed.), Good neighbors: Safe and humane communities for children and families. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. A. (1995). Preventing child maltreatment through social support: A critical analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasi, S.M. (2007, March 23). Intervention of the Holy See at the ordinary session of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Address by the Holy See’s permanent observer to the United Nations to the meeting of the Human Rights Council, Geneva. Retrieved from http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/secretariat_state/2007/documents/rc_seg-st_20070323_children_en.html.

  • Twenge, J. M. (2000). The age of anxiety? Birth cohort change in anxiety and neuroticism, 1952–1993. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1007–1021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, Office of Media Relations. (2005, February 18). CARA report on 2004 allegations released. Retrieved from http://www.usccb.org/comm/archives/2005/05-040.shtml.

  • U.S. Advisory Board on Child Abuse and Neglect. (1993). Neighbors helping neighbors: A new national strategy for the protection of children. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Committee for UNICEF. (n.d.). U.S. organizations which endorse the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child. Retrieved from http://www.abanet.org/intlaw/committees/public_II/human_rights/entitiessuppcrc.pdf.

  • Unitarian Universalist Association. (2009, November 9). Our principles. Retrieved from http://www.uua.org/visitors/6798.shtml.

  • Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vailaau, N. (2009). A theology of children. Wellington: Barnardos New Zealand & Royal New Zealand Plunket Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, J. (2000). Faith works. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Vision. (2002). Protecting children: a Biblical Perspective on child rights. Monrovia, CA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Vision International. (2007, October 15). Core values. Retrieved from http://www.wvi.org/wvi/wviweb.nsf/maindocs/7A0A54FD44BC11C38825737500737C8A?opendocument.

  • World Vision New Zealand. (n.d.). About world vision. Retrieved from https://worldvision.org.nz/PDF/resources/About_World_Vision.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary B. Melton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Melton, G.B. (2010). “To Such as These, the Kingdom of Heaven Belongs”: Religious Faith as a Foundation for Children’s Rights. In: Garbarino, J., Sigman, G. (eds) A Child's Right to a Healthy Environment. The Loyola University Symposium on the Human Rights of Children, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6791-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6791-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6789-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6791-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics