Skip to main content

Managing the Lactating Body: The Breastfeeding Project in the Age of Anxiety

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Infant Feeding Practices

Abstract

Public health campaigns aimed at increasing breastfeeding rates in the United States rest on the twin premises that the ‘breast is best’ and that breastfeeding is ‘natural’. This chapter draws on interviews with class-privileged American mothers to demonstrate that far from ‘natural’, breastfeeding decisions, practices and experiences are shaped by historical, cultural, political and social norms and customs. The chapter examines how this group of women makes decisions about infant feeding and their breastfeeding practices. I demonstrate that these women construct the lactating body as a carefully managed site and breastfeeding as a mothering project – a task to be researched, planned, implemented and assessed, supported by expert knowledge, professional advice and consumption. Viewed in this light, ‘the breast is best’ and ‘breastfeeding is natural’ are impoverished slogans that do not capture the extent to which both the science and the imagery of breastfeeding are shaped by normative assumptions and middle-class experiences. The chapter also diverges from the emphases on pleasure, embodied subjectivity, relationality and empowerment that characterise much of the recent breastfeeding literature across the humanities, arguing that these normative/political agendas do not reflect empirical realities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although the ILCA was formed by La Leche League, it quickly became an independent organisation.

  2. 2.

    The notion of exclusivity itself is a relatively new construction (Maher1992; Law2000).

References

  • Ahluwalia, I. B., Morrow, B., Hsia, J., & Grummer-Strawn L. M. (2003). Who is breast-feeding? Recent trends from the pregnancy risk assessment and monitoring system.Journal of Pediatrics, 142(5), 486–493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American Academy of Pediatrics, Work Group on Breastfeeding. (1997). Policy Statement: Breastfeeding and the use of human milk.Pediatrics, 100, 1035–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Academy of Pediatrics, Section on Breastfeeding. (2005). Policy Statement: Breastfeeding and the uses of human milk.Pediatrics, 115, 496–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apple, R. (1987).Mothers and medicine: A social history of infant feeding, 18901950. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avishai, O. (2004). At the pump.Journal of the Association for Research on Mothering, 6, 138–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avishai, O. (2007). Managing the lactating body: The Breast-Feeding Project and privileged motherhood.Qualitative Sociology, 30(2), 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D. (2005). ILCA: 20 years of building a profession.Journal of Human Lactation, 21(3), 239–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balsamo, F., Mari, G. D., Maher, V., & Serini, R. (1992). Production and pleasure: Research on breastfeeding in Turin. In V. Maher (Ed.),The anthropology of breastfeeding: Natural Law or social construct (pp. 59–90). Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartky, S. L. (1988). Foucault, femininity, and the modernization of patriarchal power. In I. Diamond & L. Quinby (Eds.),Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on resistance (pp. 61–86). Chicago: Northern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, A. (2005).Breastwork: Rethinking breastfeeding. Sydney: UNSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumslag, N., & Michels, D. L. (1995).Milk, money, and madness: The culture and politics of breastfeeding. Westport: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, L. M. (1999).At the breast: Ideologies of breastfeeding and motherhood in the contemporary United States. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobel, C. (2002).The paradox of natural mothering. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, S. (1993).Unbearable weight: Feminism, Western culture, and the body. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston Women’s Health Book Collective (1973).Our bodies, ourselves. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, F. C. (2007). “(L)Activists and lattes”: Breastfeeding advocacy as domestic performance.Women & Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory, 16(3), 347–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, P. (1995).Feminism, breasts and breast feeding. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. E., Mamo, L., Fishman, J. R., Shim, J. K., & Fosket, J. R. (2003). Biomedicalization: Technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicineAmerican Sociological Review, 68(April), 168–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis-Floyd, R. E. (1992).Birth as an American rite of passage. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis-Floyd, R. E. (2004). Consuming childbirth: The qualified commodification of midwifery care. In J. S. Taylor, L. L. Layne &, D. F. Wozniak (Eds.),Consuming motherhood (pp. 211–248). New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Human Services (2000).HHS blueprint for action on breastfeeding.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykes, F. (2005). ‘Supply’ and ‘demand’: Breastfeeding as labor.Social Science and Medicine, 60, 2283–2293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, A., Murkoff, H. E., & Hathaway, S. E. (1996).What to expect when you're expecting. New York: Workman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fildes, V. (1986).Breasts, bottles, and babies: A history of infant feeding. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, F. (2003).Fresh Milk: The secret life of breasts. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimlin, D. (2002).Body work: Beauty and self-image in American culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorham, D., & Andrews, F. K. (1990). The La Leche League: A feminist perspective. In K. Arnup, A. Levesque, & R. R. Pierson (Eds.),Delivering motherhood: Maternal ideologies and practices in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (pp. 238–69). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, B. (2003).Mother’s milk: Breastfeeding controversies in American culture. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, S. (1996).The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (2003).The commercialization of intimate life: Notes from home and work. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggings, K. (1995).The nursing mothers' companion. Boston: Harvard Commons Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulbert, A. (2003).Raising America: Experts, parents, and a century of advice about children. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukla, R. (2006). Ethics and ideology in breastfeeding campaigns.Hypatia, 21(1), 157–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd-Taylor, M., & Umansky, L. (1998).“Bad” Mothers: The politics of blame in Twentieth-century America. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (2003).Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2000). The politics of breastfeeding: Assessing risk, dividing labor.Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 25(2), 407–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litt, J. S. (2000).Medicalized motherhood: Perspectives from the lives of African-American and Jewish women. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, V. (1992).The anthropology of breast-feeding: Natural law or social construct. New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E. (1992).The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, E. (2000). Risk, responsibility, and rhetoric in infant feeding.Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 29(3), 291–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, G. A. (1988).The politics of breastfeeding. London: Pondora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, A. J. (2005). Selling compromise: Toys, motherhood, and the cultural deal.Gender Society, 19(6), 729–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, R. (1999).Testing women, testing the fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross Products Division of Abbott (2003).Breastfeeding trends—2003. Columbus: Ross Products Division. Available fromhttp://www.ross.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. S. (1997). The resurgence of breastfeeding in the United States.Pediatrics,99(4), e12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. S., Wenjun, Z., & Acosta, A. (2002). Breastfeeding continues to increase into the new millennium.Pediatrics, 110(6), 1103–1109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmied, V., & Lupton, D. (2001). Blurring the boundaries: Breastfeeding and maternal subjectivity.Sociology of health and illness, 23(2), 234–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sears, W., & Sears, M. (1993).The baby book. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangler, A. (2000). Lactation education in the 21st century: A retrospective.Journal of Human Lactation, 16(2), 129–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. S., Layne, L., & Wozniak, D. F. (2004).Consuming motherhood. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Esterik, P. (1989).Beyond the breast-bottle controversy. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. (2000).La Leche League: At the crossroads of medicine, feminism, and religion. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, J. (2005).Perfect madness: Motherhood in the age of anxiety. New York: Riverhead Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2002).Infant and young child nutrition: Global strategy, Fifty-fifth world health assembly. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, J. H. (2006). What feminists can do for breast-feeding and what breast-feeding can do for feminists.Signs, 31(3), 397–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, J. B. (2007) Is the breast really best? Risk and total motherhood in the national breast-feeding awareness campaign.Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 32(4), 595–635.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orit Avishai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Avishai, O. (2011). Managing the Lactating Body: The Breastfeeding Project in the Age of Anxiety. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Infant Feeding Practices. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6873-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6873-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6872-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6873-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics