Skip to main content

Psychophysical Studies of Auditory Masking in Marine Mammals: Key Concepts and New Directions

  • Conference paper
The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 730))

Abstract

In recent years, growing awareness of the potentially harmful effects of human-generated noise has led to concern over whether and how increasing ocean noise levels may adversely affect marine mammals by interfering with their detection of biologically important signals. The consequences of adding noise to an animal’s environment may be studied, in part, by identifying and understanding the ways in which noise alters normal or baseline hearing capabilities. The process of auditory masking occurs when the perception of a given signal is negatively influenced by the presence of another sound. Masking effects may be manifested through spectral or temporal interference from noise that decreases the audibility of the signal relative to conditions when the masking noise is not present. In addition to auditory-masking effects, it should be noted that other auditory effects as well as nonauditory behavioral, physiological, or anatomical changes may also occur as a result of noise exposure. Furthermore, marine mammals are not the only aquatic animals that may be vulnerable to these effects. However, the scope of this paper is limited to consideration of the masking effects of noise on the auditory perception of marine mammals. The specific aims are to 1) briefly review the key concepts and methods drawn from a psychophysical approach to the study of auditory masking, 2) examine how masking studies have been applied thus far to improve understanding of noise effects on marine mammals, and 3) consider how future laboratory studies with marine mammals may incorporate progressively more complex and realistic listening scenarios into psychophysical testing programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Branstetter BK, Finneran JJ (2008) Comodulation masking release in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). J Acoust Soc Am 124:25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erbe C (2000) Detection of whale calls in noise: Performance comparison between a beluga whale, human listeners, and a neural network. J Acoust Soc Am 108:297–303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erbe C, Farmer DM (1998) Masked hearing thresholds of a beluga whale (Delphinapterus leucas) in icebreaker noise. Deep-Sea Res II Top Stud Oceanogr 45:1373–1388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fastl H, Zwicker E (2007) Psychoacoustics: Facts and models. Springer, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fechner GT (1860) Elemente der psychophysik (Elements of psychophysics). Holt Rinehart & Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher H (1940) Auditory patterns. Rev Mod Phys 12:47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand SA (2001) Essentials of audiology, 2nd edn. Thieme, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstein ER (1999) Psychoacoustic evaluations of the West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostis). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt MM, Schusterman RJ (2007) Spatial release from masking of aerial tones in pinnipeds. J Acoust Soc Am 121:1219–1225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CS (1968) Masked tonal thresholds in the bottlenosed porpoise. J Acoust Soc Am 44:965–967.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kastelein RA, Wensween, PJ (2008) Effect of two levels of masking noise on the hearing threshold of a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) for a 4.0 kHz signal. Aquat Mamm 34:420–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kastelein RA, Wensween PJ, Hoek L, Au WWL, Terhune JM, de Jong CAF (2009) Critical ratios in harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) for tonal signals between 0.315 and 150 kHz in random Gaussian white noise. J Acoust Soc Am 126:1588–1597.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lemonds DW (1999) Auditory filter shapes in an Atlantic bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai’i, Honolulu, HI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohr B, Wright TF, Dooling RJ (2003) Detection and discrimination of natural calls in masking noise by birds: Estimating the active space of a signal. Anim Behav 65:763–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson WJ, Greene CR Jr, Malme CI, Thomson DH (1995) Marine mammals and noise. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southall BL, Schusterman RJ, Kastak D (2000) Masking in three pinnipeds: Underwater, low frequency critical ratios. J Acoust Soc Am 114:1660–1666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southall BL, Schusterman RJ, Kastak D (2003) Auditory masking in three pinnipeds: Aerial critical ratios and direct critical bandwidth measurements. J Acoust Soc Am 114:1660–1666.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull SD (1994) Changes in masked thresholds of a harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) associated with angular separation of signal and noise sources. Can J Zool 72:1863–1866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yost WA (2000) Fundamentals of hearing: An introduction. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yost WA, Schofner WP (2009) Critical bands and critical ratios in animal psychoacoustics: An example using chinchilla data. J Acoust Soc Am 125:315–323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colleen Reichmuth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reichmuth, C. (2012). Psychophysical Studies of Auditory Masking in Marine Mammals: Key Concepts and New Directions. In: Popper, A.N., Hawkins, A. (eds) The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 730. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7311-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics