Skip to main content

Algorithms for Maximum Satisfiability Using Unsatisfiable Cores

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Techniques in Logic Synthesis, Optimizations and Applications

Abstract

Many decision and optimization problems in electronic design automation (EDA) can be solved with Boolean satisfiability (SAT). These include binate covering problem (BCP), pseudo-Boolean optimization (PBO), quantified Boolean formulas (QBF), multi-valued SAT, and, more recently, maximum satisfiability (MaxSAT). The first generation of MaxSAT algorithms are known to be fairly inefficient in industrial settings, in part because the most effective SAT techniques cannot be easily extended to MaxSAT. This chapter proposes a novel algorithm for MaxSAT that improves existing state-of-the-art solvers by orders of magnitude on industrial benchmarks. The new algorithm exploits modern SAT solvers, being based on the identification of unsatisfiable subformulas. Moreover, the new algorithm provides additional insights between unsatisfiable subformulas and the maximum satisfiability problem.

Based on Marques-Silva, J.; Planes, J.: “Algorithms for maximum satisfiability using unsatisfiable cores,” Design, Automation and Test in Europe, 2008. DATE ’08, pp. 408–413, 10–14 March 2008 Doi: 10.1109/DATE.2008.4484715 © [2008] IEEE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ansótegui, C., Bonet, M.L., Levy, J.: Solving (weighted) partial MaxSAT through satisfiability testing. In: International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing, pp. 427–440. Swansea, UK (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ansótegui, C., Bonet, M.L., Levy, J.: A new algorithm for weighted partial MaxSAT. In: National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Atlanta, USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Argelich, J., Li, C.M., Manyá, F., Planes, J.: MaxSAT evaluation. http://www.maxsat07.udl.es/ (2008)

  4. Argelich, J., Li, C.M., Manyá, F., Planes, J.: The first and second Max-SAT evaluations. Journal on Satisfiability, Boolean Modeling and Computation 4, 251–278 (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Asín, R., Nieuwenhuis, R., Oliveras, A., Rodríguez-Carbonell, E.: Cardinality networks and their applications. In: International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing, pp. 167–180. Swansea, UK (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. de la Banda, M.G., Stuckey, P.J., Wazny, J.: Finding all minimal unsatisfiable sub-sets. In: International Conference on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming, pp. 32–43. Uppsala, Sweden (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berre, D.L., Simon, L., Roussel, O.: SAT competition. http://www.satcompetition.org/ (2008)

  8. Biere, A., Cimatti, A., Clarke, E., Zhu, Y.: Symbolic model checking without BDDs. In: Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, pp. 193–207. (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bonet, M.L., Levy, J., Manyá, F.: Resolution for Max-SAT. Artificial Intelligence 171(8–9), 606–618 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Bordeaux, L., Hamadi, Y., Zhang, L.: Propositional satisfiability and constraint programming: A comparative survey. ACM Computing Surveys 38(4) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, Y., Safarpour, S., Veneris, A.G., Marques-Silva, J.: Spatial and temporal design debug using partial MaxSAT. In: ACM Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI, pp. 345–350. Boston, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Davis, M., Logemann, G., Loveland, D.: A machine program for theorem-proving. Communications of the ACM 5, 394–397 (1962)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Dershowitz, N., Hanna, Z., Katz, J.: Bounded model checking with QBF. In: International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing, pp. 408–414. St. Andrews, UK (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Een, N., Sörensson, N.: An extensible SAT solver. In: International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing, pp. 502–518. Santa Margherita Ligure, Italy (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Een, N., Sörensson, N.: Translating pseudo-Boolean constraints into SAT. Journal on Satisfiability, Boolean Modeling and Computation 2, 1–26 (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Fu, Z., Malik, S.: On solving the partial MAX-SAT problem. In: International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing, pp. 252–265. Seattle, USA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heras, F., Larrosa, J., Oliveras, A.: MiniMaxSat: a new weighted Max-SAT solver. In: International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing, pp. 41–55. Lisbon, Portugal (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hoos, H., Stützle, T.: SAT lib. http://www.satlib.org/ (2008)

  19. Kuehlmann, A., Paruthi, V., Krohm, F., Ganai, M.K.: Robust Boolean reasoning for equivalence checking and functional property verification. IEEE Transactions on CAD of Integrated Circuits and Systems 21(12), 1377–1394 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kullmann, O.: Investigations on autark assignments. Discrete Applied Mathematics 107(1–3), 99–137 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Kullmann, O.: Lean clause-sets: generalizations of minimally unsatisfiable clause-sets. Discrete Applied Mathematics 130(2), 209–249 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Li, C.M., Manyá, F., Planes, J.: Detecting disjoint inconsistent subformulas for computing lower bounds for Max-SAT. In: National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 86–91. Boston, USA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li, C.M., Manyá, F., Planes, J.: New inference rules for Max-SAT. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 30, 321–359 (2007)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Liffiton, M.H., Sakallah, K.A.: On finding all minimally unsatisfiable subformulas. In: International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing, pp. 173–186. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liffiton, M.H., Sakallah, K.A.: Generalizing core-guided max-sat. In: International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing, pp. 481–494. Swansea, UK (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liu, C., Kuehlmann, A., Moskewicz, M.W.: CAMA: A multi-valued satisfiability solver. In: International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, pp. 326–333. San Jose, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mangassarian, H., Veneris, A.G., Safarpour, S., Najm, F.N., Abadir, M.S.: Maximum circuit activity estimation using pseudo-Boolean satisfiability. In: Design, Automation and Testing in Europe Conference, pp. 1538–1543. Nice, France (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Manquinho, V., Marques-Silva, J., Planes, J.: Algorithms for weighted Boolean optimization. In: International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing, pp. 495–508. Swansea, UK (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Marques-Silva, J., Manquinho, V.: Towards more effective unsatisfiability-based maximum satisfiability algorithms. In: International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing, pp. 225–230. Guangzhou, China (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Marques-Silva, J., Planes, J.: On using unsatisfiability for solving maximum satisfiability. http://arxiv.org/corr/ (2007)

  31. Marques-Silva, J., Planes, J.: Algorithms for maximum satisfiability using unsatisfiable cores. In: Design, Automation and Testing in Europe Conference, pp. 408–413. Munich, Germany (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  32. McMillan, K.L.: Interpolation and SAT-based model checking. In: Computer-Aided Verification, pp. 1–13. Boulders, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Safarpour, S., Mangassarian, H., Veneris, A.G., Liffiton, M.H., Sakallah, K.A.: Improved design debugging using maximum satisfiability. In: Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design, pp. 13–19. Austin, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Smith, A., Veneris, A.G., Ali, M.F., Viglas, A.: Fault diagnosis and logic debugging using Boolean satisfiability. IEEE Transactions on CAD of Integrated Circuits and Systems 24(10), 1606–1621 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sülflow, A., Fey, G., Bloem, R., Drechsler, R.: Using unsatisfiable cores to debug multiple design errors. In: ACM Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI, pp. 77–82. Orlando, USA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wang, K.H., Chan, C.M.: Incremental learning approach and SAT model for Boolean matching with don’t cares. In: International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, pp. 234–239. San Jose, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, L., Malik, S.: Validating SAT solvers using an independent resolution-based checker: Practical implementations and other applications. In: Design, Automation and Testing in Europe Conference. Munich, Germany (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joao Marques-Sila .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marques-Sila, J., Planes, J. (2011). Algorithms for Maximum Satisfiability Using Unsatisfiable Cores. In: Gulati, K. (eds) Advanced Techniques in Logic Synthesis, Optimizations and Applications. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7518-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7518-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7517-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7518-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics