Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neuropsychological Concerns

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Trial Consulting

  • 904 Accesses

Abstract

Owing to advances in injury prevention, acute emergency care, and rehabilitation technology, individuals who have sustained neurological insult, such as traumatic brain injury (TBI), enjoy a much improved prognosis. Each year, approximately 1.4 million Americans sustain TBIs, 230,000 of whom survive (Thurman & Guerrero, 1999). Additionally, at any given time there are 5.3 million Americans living with TBI-related disability (Langlois, Rutland-Brown, & Thomas, 2004). Costs associated with TBI are among the highest of all injuries and account for $48.3 billion annually (Brain Injury Association, 1999). The gravity of these statistics is underscored by the prediction that by the year 2020, TBI will be the third leading cause of death and disability (Murray & Lopez, 1997). Due to the prevalence of neurological insult and the monetary expenses related to TBI, civil cases related to TBI are becoming increasingly more common within the forensic arena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albensi, B. C., & Janigro, D. (2003). Traumatic brain injury and its effects on synaptic plasticity. Brain Injury, 17, 653–663.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, A. L., & Novack, T. A. (2002). Measuring recovery of orientation during acute rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury: Value and expectations of recovery. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 17, 210–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. (1993). Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 86–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders – Text revision (4th ed.). Washington, DC: APA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C.A. 12101§ 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashman, T. A., Schwartz, M. E., Cantor, J. B., Hibbard, M. R., & Gordon, W. A. (2004). Screening for substance abuse in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 18, 191–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bajo, A., & Fleminger, S. (2002). Brain injury rehabilitation: what works for whom and when? Brain Injury, 16, 385–395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, J. T., Pliskin, N., Axelrod, B., Faust, D., Fisher, J., Harley, J. P., et al. (2003). Introduction to the NAN 2001 definition of a Clinical Neuropsychologist. NAN policy and planning committee. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, 551–555.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). The Beck Depression Inventory-II. Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, T. L. (2001). Neuropsychological evaluation in rehabilitation planning and evaluation of functional skills. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 237–253.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benton, A. L., & Hamsher, K. deS. (1989). Multilingual Aphasia Examination. Iowa City, IO: AJA Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezeau, S. C., Bogod, N. M., & Mateer, C. A. (2004). Sexually intrusive behaviour following brain injury: Approaches to assessment and rehabilitation. Brain Injury, 18, 299–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, L. M. (1993). Assessment of malingering after mild head trauma with the Portland Digit Recognition Test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 15, 170–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, L., Kinderman, S., Heaton, R., & Salinsky, M. (1998). Neuropsychological impairment in patients with nonepileptic seizures. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 13, 513–522.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, L. M., & Willis, S. C. (1991). Assessment of motivation after financially compensable minor head trauma. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 175–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boake, C. (1996). Supervision Rating Scale: A measure of functional outcome from brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77, 765–772.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borod, J. C., Bloom, R. L., Brickman, A. M., Nakhutina, L., & Curko, E. A. (2002). Emotional processing deficits in individuals with unilateral brain damage. Applied Neuropsychology, 9, 23–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brain Injury Association. (1999). Retrieved July 23, 2005, from http://www.biausa.org.

  • Brain Injury Special Interest Group of the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. (1998). Practice parameter: Antiepileptic drug treatment of posttraumatic stress. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79, 594–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickenkamp, R., & Zillmer, K. (1998). d2 Test of Attention. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. (2003). Test of Nonverbal Intelligence: a language-free measure of cognitive ability. In R. McCallum (Ed.), Handbook of nonverbal assessment (pp. 191–221). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., Gordon, W. A., & Spielman, L. (2003). Participation in social and recreational activity in the community by individuals with traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 48, 266–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, R. A., & Harvey, A. G. (1999). Postconcussive symptoms and posttraumatic stress disorder after mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders, 187, 302–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushnik, T., Englander, J., & Duong, T. (2004). Medical and social issues related to posttraumatic seizures in patients with traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 19, 296–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Manual for administration and scoring the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camplair, P. S., Bulter, R. W., & Lezak, M. D. (2003). Providing psychological services to families of brain-injured adults and children in the present health-care environment. In G. P. Prigatano & N. H. Pliskin (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology and cost outcome research: A beginning (pp. 83–107). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappa, S. F., Benke, T., Clarke, S., Rossi, B., Stemmer, B., & van Heugten, C. M. (2003). EFNS guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation: report of an EFNS task force. European Journal of Neurology, 10, 11–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, N. C., Chesnut, R. M., Maynard, H., Mann, N. C., Patterson, P., & Helfand, M. (1999). Effect of cognitive rehabilitation on outcomes for patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 14, 277–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choca, J. P., Laatsch, L., Wetzel, L., & Agresti, A. (1997). The Halstead Category Test: A fifty year perspective. Neuropsychology Review, 7, 61–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Kalmar, K., Langenbahn, D. M., Malec, J. F., Berquist, T. F., et al. (2000). Evidenced based cognitive rehabilitation: Recommendations for clinical practice. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, 1596–1615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cifu, D. X., Keyser-Marcus, L., Lopez, E., Wehman, P., Kreutzer, J. S., Englander, J., et al. (1997). Acute predictors of successful return to work 1 year after traumatic brain injury: A multicenter analysis. Archives of PhysicalMedicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 125–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conners, C. K., & Staff, Multi-Health Systems. (1995). Conners’ Continuous Performance Test. Toronto: MHS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correia, S., Faust, D., & Doty, R. L. (2001). A re-examination of the rate of vocational dysfunction among patients with anosmia and mild to moderate closed head injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 477–488.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, J. (1995). Substance abuse as a mediating factor in outcome from traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Rehabilitation Medicine, 76, 302–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, J. D., Smith-Knapp, K., & Granger, C. V. (1998). Outcomes in the first 5 years after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79, 298–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb, S., & Crownshaw, T. (2004). The role of pharmacotherapy in the management of behaviour disorders in traumatic brain injury patients. Brain Injury, 18, 1–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., et al. (2000). California Verbal Learning Test – Second edition: Adult version manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denney, R. L., & Wynkoop, T. F. (2000). Clinical neuropsychology in the criminal forensic setting. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 15, 804–828.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dikmen, S., Machamer, J. E., Powell, J. M., & Temkin, N. R. (2003). Outcome 3 to 5 years after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 1449–1457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dikmen, S. S., Machamer, J. E., Winn, H. R., & Temkin, N. R. (1995). Neuropsychological outcome at 1-year post head injury. Neuropsychology, 9, 80–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diller, L., Ben-Yishay, Y., Gerstman, L. J., et al. (1974). Studies in cognition and rehabilitation hemipeligia (Rehabilitation Monograph No. 50). New York: NY: University Medical Center Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirette, D. (2002). The development of awareness and the use of compensatory strategies for cognitive deficits. Brain Injury, 16, 861–871.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doty, R. L. (1992). Diagnostic tests and assessment. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 7, 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, E. S. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – III. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eames, P., & Wood, R. L. (2003). Episodic disorders of behaviour and affect after acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 13, 241–258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ehde, D. M., & Jensen, M. P. (2004). Feasibility of a cognitive restructuring intervention for treatment of chronic pain in patients with disabilities. Rehabilitation Psychology, 49, 254–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elderkin-Thompson, V., Kumar, A., Bilker, W. B., Dunkin, J. J., Mintz, J., Moberg, P. J., et al. (2003). Neuropsychological deficits among patients with late-onset minor and major depression. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, 529–549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engberg, A. W., & Teasdale, T. W. (2004). Psychosocial outcome following traumatic brain injury in adults: a long-term population-based follow-up. Brain Injury, 18, 533–545.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Englander, J., Cifu, D. X., Wright, J. M., & Black, K. (2003). The association of early computed tomography scan findings and ambulation, self-care, and supervision needs at rehabilitation discharge and at 1 year after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 214–220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Essig, S. M., Mittenberg, W., Peterson, R. S., Strauman, S., & Cooper, J. T. (2001). Practices in forensic neuropsychology: Perspectives of neuropsychologists and trial attorneys. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 271–291.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fed. Rules Evid. Rule 702, 28 U.S.C.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielder, J. F. (1997). The national law journal. New York: The New York Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & William, J. (1997). The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders. Clinician version. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, S., Gauggel, S., & Trexler, L. E. (2004). Awareness of activity limitations, goal setting and rehabilitation outcome in patients with brain injury. Brain Injury, 18, 547–562.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Formisano, R., Voogt, R. D., Buzzi, M. G., Vinicola, V., Penta, F., Peppe, A., et al. (2004). Time interval of oral feeding recovery as a prognostic factor in severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 18, 103–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, R. I., & Foster, H. G. (1991). Multiple measures of malingering on a forced-choice test of cognitive ability. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 3, 596–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013–1014 (D.C. Cir. 1923).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartland, D. (2004). Considerations in the selection and use of technology with patients who have cognitive deficits following acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 14, 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gervais, R. O., Rohling, M. L., Green, P., & Ford, W. (2004). A comparison of WMT, CARB, and TOMM failure rates in non-head injury disability claimants. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 475–487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giacino, J. T. (2004). The vegetative and minimally conscious states: Consensus-based criteria for establishing diagnosis and prognosis. NeuroRehabilitation, 19, 293–298.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giacino, J. T., Ashwal, S., Childs, N., Cranford, R., Jennett, B., Katz, D. I., et al. (2002). The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology, 58, 349–353.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gierok, S. D., Dickson, A. L., & Cole, J. A. (2005). Performance of forensic and non-forensic adult psychiatric inpatients on the Test of Memory Malingering. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 755–760.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, M. B., & Wroblewski, B. (2005). Twenty years of pharmacology. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 20, 51–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1983). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, P., Dayle, R., Hood, C., & Rumrell, L. (2003). Effectiveness of the ISAAC cognitive prosthetic system for improving rehabilitation outcomes with neurofunctional impairment. NeuroRehabilitation, 18, 57–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gouvier, W. D. (1999). Base rates and clinical decision making in neuropsychology. In J. J. Sweet (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology: Fundamentals and practice (pp. 27–37). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouvier, W. D., & Coon, R. C. (2002). Misconceptions, discrimination, and disabling language: Synthesis and review. Applied Neuropsychology, 9, 48–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gouvier, W. D., Cubic, B., Jones, G., Brantley, P., & Cutlip, Q. (1992). Postconcussionsymptoms and daily stress in normal and head-injured college opulations. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 7, 192–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouvier, W. D., Hayes, J. S., & Smiroldo, B. B. (1998). The significance of base rates, test sensitivity, test specificity, and subjects’ knowledge in assessing TBI sequelae and malingering. In C. Reynolds (Ed.), Detection of malingering in head injury litigation. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouvier, W. D., O’Jile, J., & Ryan, L. M. (1998). Neuropsychological assessment for planning interventions. In G. Goldstein & S. Beers (Eds.), Rehabilitation. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouvier, W. D., Sytsma-Jordan, S., & Mayville, S. (2003). Patterns of discrimination in hiring job applicants with disability: The role of disability type, job complexity, and public contact. Rehabilitation Psychology, 48, 175–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. (2003). Welcoming a paradigm shift in neuropsychology. Archives of ClinicalPsychology, 18, 625–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P., Lees-Haley, P., & Allen, L. (2002). The Word Memory Test and the validity of neuropsychological test scores. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 2, 97–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P., Rohling, M. L., Iverson, G. L., & Gervais, R. O. (2003). Relationships between olfactory discrimination and head injury severity. Brain Injury, 17, 479–496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P., Rohling, M. L., Lees-Haley, P. R., & Allen, L. M. (2001). Effort has a greater effect on test scores than severe brain injury in compensation claimants. Brain Injury, 15, 1045–1060.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greiffenstein, M. F., Gola, T., & Baker, W. J. (1995). MMPI-2 validity scales versus domain specific measures in detection of factitious traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 9, 230–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, K., Bianchini, K., Mathias, C., Houston, R., & Crouch, J. (2002). Detecting malingered performance with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: a preliminary investigation in traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16, 179–191.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Groth-Marnat, G. (1997). Handbook of Psychological Assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth-Marnat, G. (2000). Introduction to neuropsychological assessment. In Neuropsychological assessment in clinical practice: A guide to test interpretation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunstad, J., & Suhr, J. A. (2004). Cognitive factors in Postconcussion Syndrome symptom report. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 391–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haaland, K. Y., & Delaney, H. D. (1981). Motor deficits after left or right hemisphere damage due to strike or tumor. Neuropsychologia, 19, 17–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, M. E., & Norris, M. P. (1995). Detecting the malingering of cognitive deficits: an update. Neuropsychology Review, 5, 125–148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halstead, W. C., & Wepman, J. M. (1959). The Halstead-Wepman Aphasia Screening Test. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 14, 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartlage, L. C., Durant-Wilson, D., & Patch, P. C. (2001). Persistent neurobehavioral problems following mild traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 561–570.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, D. E. (1999). Neuropsychology and the (neuro)-toxic tort. In J. J. Sweet (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology: Fundamentals and practice (pp. 339–367). Exton, PA: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1951). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory manual (rev.). New York, NY: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, R. K., Chelune, G. J., Talley, J. L., Kay, G. G., & Curtiss, G. (1993). Wisconsin Card Sorting Manual: Revised and expanded. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbronner, R. L., & Karavidas, T. (1997). Presenting neuropsychological evidence in traumatic brain injury litigation. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 11, 445–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilsabeck, R. C., Gouvier, W. D., & Bolter, J. F. (1998). Reconstructive memory bias in recall of neuropsychological symptomatology. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 20, 328–338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hinkebein, J. H., Martin, T. A., Callahan, C. D., & Johnstone, B. (2003). Traumatic brain injury and Alzheimer’s: deficit profile similarities and the impact of normal ageing. Brain Injury, 17, 1035–1042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, A., Veerabangsa, A., Drane, D., & McCluskey, A. (2000). Service utilization following traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 15, 1208–1226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, U. (2001). Crossing the i’s and dotting the t’s. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 11, 197–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzberg, E. (2001). The best practice for gaining and maintaining employment for individuals with traumatic brain injury. Work, 16, 245–258.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hom, J. (2003). Forensic neuropsychology: are we there yet? Archives of ClinicalNeuropsychology, 18, 827–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, G. L., & Lange, R. T. (2003). Examination of “Postconcussion-like” symptoms in a healthy sample. Applied Neuropsychology, 10, 137–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, G. L., Lovell, M. R., & Smith, S. S. (2000). Does brief loss of consciousness affect cognitive functioning after mild head injury? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 643–648.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jennett, B., & Bond, M. (1975). Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet, 1, 480–484 (response to comment: Yes).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R., Tranel, D., & Benton, A. (1992). Differentiating dementia from “pseudodementia” early in the clinical course: utility of neuropsychological tests. Neurospychology, 6, 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ju, D., & Varney, N. R. (2000). Can head injury patients simulate malingering? Applied Neuropsychology, 7, 201–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judd, L. L., & Kunovac, J. L. (1998). Clinical characteristics and management of unipolar depressive disorders comorbid with neurological disorders. Neuropsychobiology, 37, 84–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kadyan, V., Colachis, S. C., Depalma, M. J., Sanderson, J. D., & Mysiw, W. J. (2003). Early recognition of neuroleptics malignant syndrome during traumatic brain Injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury, 17, 631–637.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. F., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). The Boston Naming Test (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, N., Glisky, E. L., & Wilson, B. A. (2004). Technological memory aids for patients with memory deficits. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 14, 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashluba, S., Paniak, C., Blake, T., Reynolds, S., Toller-Lobe, G., & Nagy, J. (2004). A longitudinal, controlled study of patient complaints following treated mild traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 805–816.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. I., & Alexander, M. P. (1994). Traumatic brain injury. Predicting course of recovery and outcome for patients admitted to rehabilitation. Archives of Neurology, 51, 661–670.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, P. M. (2005). The objectivity, fairness, and integrity of neuropsychological evaluations in litigation. A privilege second to none? The Journal of Legal Medicine, 26, 95–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keyser-Marcus, L. A., Bricout, J. C., Wehman, P., Campbell, L. R., Cifu, D. X., Englander, J., et al. (2002). Acute predictors of return to employment after traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal follow-up. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 635–641.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khan-Bourne, N., & Brown, R. G. (2003). Cognitive behaviour therapy for the treatment of depression in individuals with brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 13, 89–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiernan, R. J., Mueller, J., & Langston, J. W. (1995). Cognistat. San Francisco, CA: Northern California Neurobehavioral Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kizilbash, A. H., Vanderploeg, R. D., & Curtiss, G. (2002). The effects of depression and anxiety on memory performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17, 57–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klonoff, P. S., & Dawson, L. K. (2004). Commentary – Neuropsychological evaluation ofpatients with traumatic brain injury: polarization versus holistic integration. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 1095–1101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klonoff, P. S., Lamb, D. G., & Henderson, S. W. (2000). Milieu-based neuro-rehabilitation in patients with traumatic brain injury: Outcome at up to 11 years post-discharge. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, 1535–1537.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klonoff, P. S., Lamb, D. G., & Henderson, S. W. (2001). Outcomes from milieu-based neurorehabilitation at up to 11 years post-discharge. Brain Injury, 15, 413–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klove, H. (1963). Clinical neuropsychology. In F. M. Forster (Ed.), The medical clinics of North America (pp. 1647–1658). New York: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koltai, D., Welsh-Bohmer, K., & Schmechel, D. (2001). Influence of anosognosia on treatment outcome among dementia patients. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 11, 455–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laatsch, L., Little, D., & Thulborn, K. (2004). Changes in fMRI following cognitive rehabilitation in severe traumatic brain injury: A case study. Rehabilitation Psychology, 49, 262–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, J. A., Rutland-Brown, W., & Thomas, K. E. (2004). Traumatic brain injury in the United States: Emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths. Atlanta, GA. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewinshohn, P. M., & Graf, M. (1973). Pleasant activities and depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 41, 261–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lezak, M. D. (1988). Brain damage is a family affair. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 111–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lezak, M. D. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, F. D. (1962). Malingering in personal injury cases. Temple Law Quarterly, 35, 141–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist, A., & Rönnberg, J. (2001). Driving problems and adaptive driving behaviour after brain injury: A qualitative assessment. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 11, 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marin, R. S., & Wilkosz, P. A. (2005). Disorders of diminished motivation. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 20, 377–388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, N. V., Kersel, D. A., Havill, J. H., & Sleigh, J. W. (1998). Caregiver burden at 1 year following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 12, 1045–1059.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathias, C., Greve, K., Bianchini, K., Houston, R., & Crouch, J. (2002). Detecting malingered neurocognitive dysfunction using the reliable digit span in traumatic brain injury. Assessment, 9, 301–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mattis, S., Jurica, P. J., & Leitten, C. (2001). Dementia Rating Scale (2nd ed.). Tampa, FL: Psychological assessment resources manual.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaffrey, R. J., Fisher, J. M., Gold, B. A., & Lynch, J. K. (1996). Presence of third parties during neuropsychological evaluations: Who is evaluating whom? The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 10, 435–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinzey, R. K., & Ziegler, T. G. (1999). Challenging a flexible neuropsychological battery under Kelly/Frye: A case study. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 543–551.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, T. M., Williams, W. H., & Bryant, R. (2003). Post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury: A review of causal mechanisms, assessment, and treatment. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 13, 149–164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, K. M., Ott, A., Kalmijn, S., Slooter, A. J. C., Van Duijn, C. M., Hofman, A., et al. (1999). Head trauma and risk of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: the Rotterdam Study. Neurology, 53, 1959–1962.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, G., Finn, S., Eyde, L., Kay, G., Moreland, I., Dies, R., et al. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56, 128–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millar, K., Nicoll, J. A. R., Thornhill, S., Murray, G. D., & Teasdale, G. M. (2003). Long term neuropsychological outcome after head injury: relation to APOE genotype. The Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 74, 1047–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millis, S. R., Rosenthal, M., Novack, T. A., Sherer, M., Nick, T. G., Kreutzer, J. S., et al. (2001). Long-term neuropsychological outcome after traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 16, 343–355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mittenberg, W., Azrin, R., Millsaps, C., & Heilbronner, R. (1993). Identification of malingered head injury on the Wechsler Memory Scale – Revised. Psychological Assessment, 5, 34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R., & Moos, B. S. (1994). Family Environment Scale (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality Assessment Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. J. L., & Lopez, A. D. (1997). Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990-2020: Global Burden of Disease Study. The Lancet, 349, 1498–1504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institutes of Health. (1998). Rehabilitation of patients with traumatic brain injury. National Institutes of Health Consensus Statement, 16, 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemetz, P. N., Leibson, C., Naessens, J. M., Beard, M., Kokmen, E., Annegers, J. F., et al. (1999). Traumatic brain injury and time to onset of Alzheimer’s disease: A population-based study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 149, 32–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nihira, K., Leland, H., & Lambert, N. (1992). Adaptive Behavior Scale – Residential and community (ABS-RC:2) (2nd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novack, T. A., Bush, B. A., Meythaler, J. M., & Canupp, K. (2001). Outcome after traumatic brain injury: pathway analysis of contributions from premorbid, injury severity, and recovery variables. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82, 300–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ponsford, J. (2003). Sexual changes associated with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 13, 275–289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prigatano, G. P. (2005). Disturbances of self-awareness and rehabilitation of patients withtraumatic brain injury. A 20-year perspective. The Journal of Head TraumaRehabilitation, 20, 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, M., Hall, K. M., Hopkins, K., Belleza, T., & Cope, D. N. (1982). Disability Rating Scale for severe head trauma: Coma to community. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 63, 118–123.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rath, J. F., Langenbahn, D. M., Simon, D., Sherr, R. L., Fletcher, J., & Diller, L. (2004). The construct of problem solving in higher level neuropsychological assessment and rehabilitation. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 613–635.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C. (1938). Progressive matrices: A perceptual test of intelligence. London: HK Lewis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, J. E. (1996). Fixed vs. flexible neuropsychological test batteries under the Daubert standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 14, 315–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M. (1992). Trail Making Test: Manual for administration and scoring. Tucson, AZ: Reitan Neuropsychology Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1993). The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and clinical interpretation. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (2000). The neuropsychological similarities of mild and More severe head injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 433–442.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rey, A. (1964). L’examen clinique en psychologie. Paris: Presses Universaires de France.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. (1998). Common sense, clinicians, and actuarialism. Detection of malingering during head injury litigation. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, R. E. L., & Adams, R. L. (1992). Neuropsychologists as expert witnesses: Issues of admissibility. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 6, 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. J. (1999). Epilepsy spectrum disorder in the context of mild traumatic brain injury. In N. R. Varney & R. J. Roberts (Eds.), Mild head injury: Causes, evaluation and treatment (pp. 209–247). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, I. H., & Murre, J. M. J. (1999). Rehabilitation after brain damage: Brain plasticity and principles of guided recovery. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 544–575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, L. N., Helzer, J. E., Croughan, J. L., & Ratliff, K. S. (1981). National Institute of Mental Health diagnostic interview schedule: Its history, characteristics, and validity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 381–389.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. (1997). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roid, G. H. (2003). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales (5th ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruff, R. M. (2005). Two decades of advances in understanding of mild traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 20, 5–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruff, R. M., Camenzuli, L., & Mueller, J. (1996). Miserable minority: Emotional risk factors that influence the outcome of a mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 10, 551–565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. W., Russell, S. L. K., & Hill, B. D. (2005). The fundamental psychometric status of neuropsychological batteries. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 785–794.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santa Maria, M. P., Pinkston, J. B., Miller, S. R., & Gouvier, W. D. (2001). Stability of postconcussion symptomotology differs between high and low responders and by gender but not by mild head injury status. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 133–140.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sbordone, R. J., & Liter, J. C. (1995). Mild traumatic brain injury does not produce posttraumatic stress disorder. Brain Injury, 9, 405–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, R., & Beach, S. (1999). Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: The caregiver health effects study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 2215–2219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherer, M., Hart, T., Whyte, J., Nick, T. G., & Yablon, S. A. (2005). Neuroanatomic basis of impaired self-awareness after traumatic brain injury. Findings from early computed tomography. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 20, 287–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherer, M., & Novack, T. A. (2003). Neuropsychological assessment after traumatic brain injury in adults. In G. P. Prigatano & N. H. Pliskin (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology and cost outcome research: A beginning (pp. 39–60). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivan, A. B. (1992). Benton Visual Retention Test (5th ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slick, D. J., Sherman, E. M. S., & Iverson, G. L. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13, 545–561.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Seemiller, L., Fow, N. R., Kant, R., & Franzen, M. D. (2003). Presence of post-concussion syndrome symptoms in patients with chronic pain vs. mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 17, 199–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, S. S., Balla, D. A., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1984). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Test manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. New York: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbens, G. T., & Wilson, R. S. (1998). Estimation of premorbid intelligence in neurologically impaired individuals. In P. J. Snyder & P. D. Nussbaum (Eds.), Clinical Neuropsychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, R. A., & White, T. (2003). Neuropsychological Assessment Battery. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuss, D. T., Binns, M. A., Carruth, F. G., Levine, B., Brandys, C. E., Moulton, R. J., et al. (1999). The acute period of recovery from traumatic brain injury: Post-traumatic amnesia or post-traumatic confusional state? Journal of Neurosurgery, 90, 635–643.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stuss, D. T., & Buckle, L. (1992). Traumatic brain injury: Neuropsychological deficits and evaluation at different stages of recovery and in different pathological subtypes. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 7, 40–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, J., & Moberg, P. (1990). A survey of practices and beliefs among ABPP and non-ABPP clinical neuropsychologists. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 4, 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, J. J., Moberg, P. J., & Westergaard, C. K. (1996). Five year follow-up survey of practices and beliefs of clinical neuropsychologists. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 10, 202–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam, S., & Man, W. (2004). Evaluating computer-assisted memory retraining programmes for patients with post-head injury amnesia. Brain Injury, 18, 461–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. S. (1996). Neurorehabilitation and neurolaw. NeuroRehabilitation, 7, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. S. (1999). The legal environment pertaining to clinical neuropsychology. In J. J. Sweet (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology. Fundamentals and practice (pp. 421–442). Exton, PA: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L. A., Kreutzer, J. S., Demm, S. R., & Meade, M. A. (2003). Traumatic brain injury and substance abuse: A review and analysis of the literature. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 13, 165–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thurman, D., & Guerrero, J. (1999). Trends in hospitalization associate with traumatic brain injury. Journal of the American Medical Association, 8, 989–991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). Test of Memory Malingering. New York: Multi Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trueblood, W., & Schmidt, M. (1993). Malingering and other validity considerations in the neuropsychological evaluation of mild head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 12, 578–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner-Stokes, L. (1999). Outcome measures for inpatient neurorehabilitation settings. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 9, 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyrer, S., & Lievesley, A. (2003). Pain following traumatic brain injury: Assessment and management. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 13, 189–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uysal, S., Hibbard, M. R., Robillard, D., Pappadopulos, E., & Jaffe, M. (1998). The effect of parental traumatic brain injury on parenting and child behavior. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 13, 57–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vallabhajosula, B., & Van Gorp, W. G. (2001). Post-Daubert admissibility of scientific evidence on malingering of cognitive deficits. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 29, 201–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gorp, W. G., & McMullen, W. J. (1997). Potential sources of bias in forensic neuropsychological evaluations. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 11(2), 180–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderploeg, R. D., Schinka, J. A., & Axelrod, B. N. (1996). Estimation of the WAIS-R premorbid intelligence: Current ability and demographic data used in a best- performance fashion. Psychological Assessment, 8, 404–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varney, N. R. (1989). Iowa Collateral Head Injury Interview. Neuropsychology, 5, 223–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varney, N. R., & Roberts, R. J. (1999). The evaluation and treatment of mild traumatic Brain injury. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasyliw, O. E., & Golden, C. J. (1985). Neuropsychological evaluation in the assessment of personal injury. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 3, 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1997a). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (3rd ed.). The Psychological Corporation: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1997b). Wechsler Memory Scale (3rd ed.). The Psychological Corporation: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehman, P., Targett, P., West, M., & Kregel, J. (2005). Productive work and employment for patients with traumatic brain injury. What have we learned after 20 years? The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 20, 115–127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, L. E., Devinsky, O., & Geocadin, R. (1998). Nonepileptic seizures after head injury. Epilepsia, 39, 978–982.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, J. L., Cifu, D., Dikmen, S., & Temkin, N. (2001). Prediction of functional outcomes after traumatic brain injury: A comparison of 2 measures of duration of unconsciousness. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 82, 1355–1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. H., & Evans, J. J. (2003). Brain injury and emotion: An overview to a special issue on biopsychosocial approaches in neurorehabilitation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 13, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. H., Evans, J. J., & Fleminger, S. (2003). Neurorehabilitation and cognitive-behavior therapy of anxiety disorders after brain injury: An overview and a case illustration of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 13, 133–148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. L., McCrea, J. D., Wood, L. M., & Merriman, R. N. (1999). Clinical and costeffectiveness of post-acute neurobehavioral rehabilitation. Brain Injury, 13, 69–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. L., & Yurdakel, L. K. (1997). Change in relationship status following traumatic Brain injury. Brain Injury, 11, 491–501.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ylvisaker, M., Kolpan, K. I., & Rosenthal, M. (1994). Collaboration in preparing for personal injury suits after TBI. Topics in Language Disorders, 15, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zasler, N. D., & Martelli, M. F. (2003). Mild traumatic brain injury: Impairment and disability assessment caveats. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 13, 31–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zillmer, E. A. (2004). National Academy of Neuropsychology: President’s address. The future of neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 713–724.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA

    William Drew Gouvier

Authors
  1. William Drew Gouvier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heather A. Stewart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Adrianne M. Brennan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Drew Gouvier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska/Lincoln, Burnett Hall 338, Lincoln, 68588-9296, Nebraska, USA

    Richard L. Wiener

  2. Dept. Psychology, University of Nebraska, Burnett Hall 335, Lincoln, 68588-0308, Nebraska, USA

    Brian H. Bornstein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gouvier, W.D., Stewart, H.A., Brennan, A.M. (2011). Neuropsychological Concerns. In: Wiener, R., Bornstein, B. (eds) Handbook of Trial Consulting. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7569-0_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation