Skip to main content

Contraindications to Laparoscopy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The SAGES Manual of Quality, Outcomes and Patient Safety
  • 1946 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reviews the relative contraindications to laparoscopy and general considerations to apply to the safe application of laparoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Selected Readings

  1. Vilos GA, Ternamian A, Dempster J, et al. Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007;29(5):433–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmad G, Duffy JMN, Phillips K, et al. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(2):CD006583.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Granata M, Tsimpanakos L, Moeity F, et al. Are we underutilizing Palmer’s point in gynecologic laparoscopy? Fertil Steril. 2010;94(7):2716–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. String A, Berber E, Foroutani A, et al. Use of the optical access trocar for safe and rapid entry in various laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc. 2001;15(6):570–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas MA, Rha KH, Ong AM, et al. Optical access trocar injuries in urological laparoscopic surgery. J Urol. 2003;170(1):61–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Berch BR, Torquati A, Lutfi RE, et al. Experience with the optical access trocar for safe and rapid entry in the performance of laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1238–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McKernan JB, Finley CR. Experience with optical trocar in performing laparoscopic procedures. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002;12(2):96–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirshtein B, Roy-Shapira A, Lantsberg L, et al. Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(4):464–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zerey M, Sechrist CW, Kercher KW, et al. Laparoscopic management of adhesive small bowel obstruction. Am Surg. 2007;73(8):773–8. discussion 778–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grafen FC, Neuhaus V, Schöb O, et al. Management of acute small bowel obstruction from intestinal adhesions: indications for laparoscopic surgery in a community teaching hospital. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010;395(1):57–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Szomstein S, Lo Menzo E, Simpfendorfer C, et al. Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions. World J Surg. 2006;30(4):535–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang Q, Hu ZQ, Wang WJ, et al. Laparoscopic management of recurrent adhesive small-bowel obstruction: long-term follow-up. Surg Today. 2009;39(6):493–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Walsh CA, Tang T, Walsh SR. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review. Int J Surg. 2008;6(4):339–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lemieux P, Rheaume P, Levesque I, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy in pregnant patients: a review of 45 cases. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(8):1701–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirshtein B, Perry ZH, Avinoach E, et al. Safety of laparoscopic appendectomy during pregnancy. World J Surg. 2009;33(3):475–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sadot E, Telem DA, Arora M, et al. Laparoscopy: a safe approach to appendicitis during pregnancy. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(2):383–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Corneille MG, Gallup TM, Bening T, et al. The use of laparoscopic surgery in pregnancy: evaluation of safety and efficacy. Am J Surg. 2010;200(3):363–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Colles SL, Dixon JB, Marks P, et al. Preoperative weight loss with a very-low-energy diet: quantitation of changes in liver and abdominal fat by serial imaging. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84(2):304–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Franklin ME, Kazantsev GB, Abrego D, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for stage III colon cancer: long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2000;14(7):612–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Patankar SK, Larach SW, Ferrara A, et al. Prospective comparison of laparoscopic vs. open resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma over a ten-year period. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(5):601–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Champault GG, Barrat C, Raselli R, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal carcinoma: a prospective clinical trial involving 157 cases with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002;12(2):88–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brandon Williams MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, B. (2012). Contraindications to Laparoscopy. In: Tichansky, MD, FACS, D., Morton, MD, MPH, J., Jones, D. (eds) The SAGES Manual of Quality, Outcomes and Patient Safety. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7901-8_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7901-8_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7900-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7901-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics