Skip to main content

The Required Quantitative Skills

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy and the Wealth of Nations

Abstract

Most of the time economists do not “do science.” Rather they tell stories dressed up in mathematics. Neoclassical economists mostly tell stories of the magic of market self regulation. Keynesian economists tell stories about how correct amounts of spending, taxing, and money creation can balance an otherwise unstable economy and lead to economic growth. If you want to understand the economist’s story you should learn the requisite mathematics. Perhaps more importantly, if you want economists to listen to your story, you need to learn to present it in a language they understand and respect. If you can’t express yourself mathematically then most economists will not even bother to listen to your story, no matter how compelling or well-supported by evidence. Even if presented with mathematical elegance mainstream economists may still reject your story if it conflicts too badly with theirs. But at least speaking the language of mathematics will give you a fighting chance of being listened to. Far too many economists arrogantly dismiss the analyses of other social scientists whose valuable insights are expressed primarily in words or oral histories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hall, C.A.S. 1988. An assessment of several of the historically most influential theoretical models used in ecology and of the data provided in their support. Ecological Modeling 43: 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hall, C.A.S. and J.W. Day (eds). 1977. Ecosystem modeling in theory and practice. An introduction with case histories. Wiley Interscience, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hall, C. 1991. An idiosyncratic assessment of the role of mathematical models in environmental sciences. Environment International. 17: 507–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gowdy, J., 2004. The revolution in welfare economics and its implications for environmental valuation. Land economics 80: 239–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaufmann, R. K. 1992. A biophysical analysis of the energy/real GDP ratio: implications for substitution and technical change. Ecological Economics 6: 35–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaufmann, R. K. and Stern, D. I. 1997. Evidence of human influence on climate from hemispheric temperature relations. Nature. 388: 40–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. John G. Kemeny: BASIC and DTSS: Everyone a Programmer (Obituary). http://www.columbia.edu/∼jrh29/kemeny.html

  8. Williston, Mary. 1981 Physics envy. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles A. S. Hall .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hall, C.A.S., Klitgaard, K.A. (2012). The Required Quantitative Skills. In: Energy and the Wealth of Nations. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9398-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9398-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9397-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9398-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics