Abstract
Self-performed arm movements are known to increase the tactile detection threshold (i.e., decrease of tactile sensitivity) which is part of a phenomenon called tactile suppression. Today, the origin and the effects of tactile suppression are not fully understood. Tactile discrimination tasks have been utilized to quantify the changes in tactile sensitivity due to arm movements and to identify the origin of tactile suppression. The results show that active arm movement also increases tactile discrimination thresholds which has never been shown before. Furthermore, it is shown that tactile sensitivity drops at approximately 100 ms before the actual arm movement. We conclude that tactile suppression has two origins: (1) a movement related motor command which is a neuronal signal that can be measured 100 ms before a muscle contraction. This motor command is the origin for the increase of the discrimination threshold prior to the arm movement and (2) task irrelevant sensory input which reduces tactile sensitivity after the onset of the arm movement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kastner, S., De Weerd, P., Desimone, R., Ungerleider, L.G.: Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional mri. Science 282(5386), 108–111 (1998)
Burr, D.C., Holt, J., Johnstone, J.R., Ross, J.: Selective depression of motion sensitivity during saccades. J. Physiol. 333, 1–15 (1982)
Burr, D.C., Morrone, M.C., Ross, J.: Selective suppression of the magnocellular visual pathway during saccadic eye movements. Nature 371(6497), 511–513 (1994)
Richards, W.A.: Saccadic suppression. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 59, 617–623 (1969)
Helmholtz, H.: Handbuch der physiologischen Optik. Voss, Leipzig (1867)
von Holst, E., Mittelstaedt, H.: Das Reafferenzprinzip. Naturwissenschaften 20, 464–475 (1950)
Ilg, U.J., Hoffmann, K.P.: Motion perception during saccades. Vis. Res. 33(2), 211–220 (1993)
Matin, E.: Saccadic suppression: a review and an analysis. Psychol. Bull. 81(12), 899–917 (1974)
Sperry, R.W.: Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 43(6), 482–489 (1950)
Holt, E.: Eye movement and central anesthesia. Harv. Psychol. Stud. 1, 3–45 (1903)
Mackay, D.M.: Elevation of visual threshold by displacement of retinal image. Nature 225(5227), 90–92 (1970)
Burr, D.C., Morgan, M.J., Morrone, M.C.: Saccadic suppression precedes visual motion analysis. Curr. Biol. 9(20), 1207–1209 (1999)
Bridgeman, B., Hendry, D., Stark, L.: Failure to detect displacement of the visual world during saccadic eye movements. Vis. Res. 15(6), 719–722 (1975)
Shioiri, S., Cavanagh, P.: Saccadic suppression of low-level motion. Vis. Res. 29(8), 915–928 (1989)
Diamond, M.R., Ross, J., Morrone, M.C.: Extraretinal control of saccadic suppression. J. Neurosci. 20(9), 3449–3455 (2000)
Blakemore, S.J., Frith, C.D., Wolpert, D.M.: Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11(5), 551–559 (1999)
Blakemore, S.J., Goodbody, S.J., Wolpert, D.M.: Predicting the consequences of our own actions: the role of sensorimotor context estimation. J. Neurosci. 18(18), 7511–7518 (1998)
Blakemore, S.J., Wolpert, D., Frith, C.: Why can’t you tickle yourself? NeuroReport 11(11), 11–16 (2000)
Blakemore, S.J., Wolpert, D.M., Frith, C.D.: Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nat. Neurosci. 1(7), 635–640 (1998)
Blakemore, S.J., Wolpert, D.M., Frith, C.D.: The cerebellum contributes to somatosensory cortical activity during self-produced tactile stimulation. NeuroImage 10(4), 448–459 (1999)
Rushton, D.N., Rothwell, J.C., Craggs, M.D.: Gating of somatosensory evoked potentials during different kinds of movement in man. Brain 104(3), 465–491 (1981)
Chapman, C.E., Beauchamp, E.: Differential controls over tactile detection in humans by motor commands and peripheral reafference. J. Neurophysiol. 96(3), 1664–1675 (2006)
Seki, K., Perlmutter, S.I., Fetz, E.E.: Sensory input to primate spinal cord is presynaptically inhibited during voluntary movement. Nat. Neurosci. 6(12), 1309–1316 (2003)
Chapman, C.E., Bushnell, M.C., Miron, D., Duncan, G.H., Lund, J.P.: Sensory perception during movement in man. Exp. Brain Res. 68(3), 516–524 (1987)
Post, L.J., Zompa, I.C., Chapman, C.E.: Perception of vibrotactile stimuli during motor activity in human subjects. Exp. Brain Res. 100(1), 107–120 (1994)
Schmidt, R.F., Schady, W.J., Torebjork, H.E.: Gating of tactile input from the hand. I. Effects of finger movement. Exp. Brain Res. 79(1), 97–102 (1990)
Schmidt, R.F., Torebjork, H.E., Schady, W.J.: Gating of tactile input from the hand. II. Effects of remote movements and anaesthesia. Exp. Brain Res. 79(1), 103–108 (1990)
Williams, S.R., Shenasa, J., Chapman, C.E.: Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. I. Importance of stimulus location. J. Neurophysiol. 79(2), 947–963 (1998)
Lamb, G.D.: Tactile discrimination of textured surfaces: psychophysical performance measurements in humans. J. Physiol. 338, 551–565 (1983)
Ueberle, M., Mock, N., Buss, M.: Vishard10, a novel hyper-redundant haptic interface. In: 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (HAPTICS’04) (2004)
Drewing, K., Fritschi, M., Zopf, R., Ernst, M.O., Buss, M.: Tactile display exerting shear force via lateral displacement. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 2(2), 118–131 (2005)
Faisal, A.A., Selen, L.P., Wolpert, D.M.: Noise in the nervous system. Nat. Rev., Neurosci. 9, 292–303 (2008)
Chapman, C.E., Jiang, W., Lamarre, Y.: Modulation of lemniscal input during conditioned arm movements in the monkey. Exp. Brain Res. 72(2), 316–334 (1988)
Cohen, L.G., Starr, A.: Localization, timing and specificity of gating of somatosensory evoked potentials during active movement in man. Brain 110(Pt 2), 451–467 (1987)
Dyhre-Poulsen, P.: Perception of tactile stimuli before ballistic and during the following manner tracking movements. In: Gordon, G. (ed.) Active Touch, pp. 171–176. Pergamon, Oxford (1978)
Ghez, C., Pisa, M.: Inhibition of afferent transmission in cuneate nucleus during voluntary movement in the cat. Brain Res. 40(1), 145–155 (1972)
Jiang, W., Lamarre, Y., Chapman, C.E.: Modulation of cutaneous cortical evoked potentials during isometric and isotonic contractions in the monkey. Brain Res. 536(1–2), 69–78 (1990)
Kron, A., Schmidt, G.: Haptic telepresent control technology applied to disposal of explosive ordnances: Principles and experimental results. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), pp. 1505–1510 (2005)
Williams, S.R., Chapman, C.E.: Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. II. Effects of stimulus intensity. J. Neurophysiol. 84(2), 863–875 (2000)
Williams, S.R., Chapman, C.E.: Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. III. Effect of motor tasks. J. Neurophysiol. 88(4), 1968–1979 (2002)
Eccles, J.C., Schmidt, R.F., Willis, W.D.: Depolarization of the central terminals of cutaneous afferent fibers. J. Neurophysiol. 26(4), 646–661 (1963)
Janig, W., Schmidt, R.F., Zimmermann, M.: Two specific feedback pathways to the central afferent terminals of phasic and tonic mechanoreceptors. Exp. Brain Res. 6(2), 116–129 (1968)
Jankowska, E., Slawinska, U., Hammar, I.: Differential presynaptic inhibition of actions of group II afferents in di- and polysynaptic pathways to feline motoneurones. J. Physiol. 542(Pt 1), 287–299 (2002)
Rudomin, P., Schmidt, R.F.: Presynaptic inhibition in the vertebrate spinal cord revisited. Exp. Brain Res. 129(1), 1–37 (1999)
Acknowledgements
We thank Martin Buss and Angelika Peer for providing us with the ViSHaRD10 and the DeKIFeD4 devices and the help for setting up these systems in our lab. Furthermore, we thank Michael Fritschi and Mario Kleiner with help in the programming of the experimental procedure, Massimiliano Di Luca for help in conceptualizing the experiment and Alexandra Reichenbach and Axel Tielscher for help with the EMG analysis. This work was partly supported by the ImmerSence project within the 6th Framework Programme of the European Union, FET—Presence Initiative, contract number IST-2006-027141, see also www.immersence.info.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vitello, M.P., Fritschi, M., Ernst, M.O. (2012). Active Movement Reduces the Tactile Discrimination Performance. In: Peer, A., Giachritsis, C. (eds) Immersive Multimodal Interactive Presence. Springer Series on Touch and Haptic Systems. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2754-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2754-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2753-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2754-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)