Skip to main content

Is There Less Morbidity After Laparoscopic Surgery?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Treatment of Postoperative Complications After Digestive Surgery

Abstract

Since the systematic introduction of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in 1989, questions continue to arise whether MIS compares to conventional surgery in terms of efficacy and safety. Two special triggers for this quest were first the appearance of the port-site metastases after laparoscopic colon resection for cancer and second the progressive imperative to make surgical practice an objective science. Since then evidence-based surgery (EBS) has proven that MIS is a tremendous advancement in Surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, Thomas JM. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2007;245:232–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Butler N, Collins S, Memon B, Memon MA. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: current status and future direction. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2072–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1662–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg. 2003;238:486–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position-experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:7–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1887–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Broeders JA, Bredenoord AJ, Hazebroek EJ, et al. Reflux and belching after 270 degree versus 360 degree laparoscopic posterior fundoplication. Ann Surg. 2012;255:59–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boeckxstaens GE, Annese V, des Varannes SB, et al. Pneumatic dilatation versus laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy for idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1807–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, et al. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg. 2005;241:232–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report-a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010;251:417–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2224–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guillou PS, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial), randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:1718–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:477–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H, et al. Transatlantic laparoscopically assisted vs Open Colectomy Trials Study Group. Arch Surg. 2007;142:298–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leung KL, Kwok SPY, Lam SCW, et al. Laparoscopic resection of recto-sigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomized trial. Lancet. 2004;363:1187–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Klarenbeek BR, Veenhof AA, Bergamaschi R, et al. Laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis decreases major morbidity rates: a randomised control trial: short term results of the Sigma trial. Ann Surg. 2009;249:39–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, et al. Laparoscopic assisted versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2006;243:143–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2004;240:984–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Polle SW, Dunker MS, Slors JF, et al. Body image, cosmesis, quality of life, and functional outcome of hand assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy: long term results of a randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1301–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Polle SW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Slors JF, et al. Total laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: are there advantages compared with the open and hand assisted approaches ? Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:541–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Color II Study Group, Buunen M, Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, et al. COLOR II. A randomised clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. Dan Med Bull 2009;56:89–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel A. Cuesta MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Lacy, A.M., Delgado, S., Cuesta, M.A. (2014). Is There Less Morbidity After Laparoscopic Surgery?. In: Cuesta, M., Bonjer, H. (eds) Treatment of Postoperative Complications After Digestive Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4354-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4354-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4353-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4354-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics