Skip to main content

Top Ten Electrocardiographic (ECG) Abnormalities Not to Miss

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evidence-Based Cardiology Consult

Abstract

This chapter presents ten cases with characteristic electrocardiographic (ECG) findings that should not be missed. The first case demonstrates the chronological ECG changes seen during ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. The case presenting sinus node dysfunction (SND) highlights the various ECG manifestations of SND. The case of atrioventricular (AV) block highlights the approach to the diagnosis of 2:1 AV block. The case of Wolff–Parkinson–White (WPW) syndrome describes the diagnostic ECG criteria for WPW syndrome and the supraventricular tachycardias associated with it. The wide complex tachycardia (WCT) case presents a stepwise algorithmic approach to the diagnosis of WCT. The case of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy focuses on risk stratification for sudden death. We present the characteristic ECG findings in patients with Brugada syndrome, long QT syndrome, and early repolarization syndrome that are causes of sudden death in young patients without structural heart disease. Finally, we present the approach to the diagnosis of artifact on the ECG that is important to prevent expensive workups and unnecessary treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 209.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wagner GS, Macfarlane P, Wellens H, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part VI: acute ischemia/infarction: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(11):1003–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mendis S, Thygesen K, Kuulasmaa K, et al. World Health Organization definition of myocardial infarction: 2008–09 revision. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40(1):139–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang HD, Birnbaum Y. ST elevation: differentiation between ST elevation myocardial infarction and nonischemic ST elevation. J Electrocardiol. 2011;44(5):494.e491–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Badhwar N, Kusumoto F, Goldschlager N. Arrhythmias in the coronary care unit. J Intensive Care Med. 2012;27(5):267–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Adan V, Crown LA. Diagnosis and treatment of sick sinus syndrome. Am Fam Physician. 2003;67(8):1725–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brignole M. Sick sinus syndrome. Clin Geriatr Med. 2002;18(2):211–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 guideline update for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices) developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(21):e1–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barold SS. 2:1 Atrioventricular block: order from chaos. Am J Emerg Med. 2001;19(3):214–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Maury P, Zimmermann M, Metzger J. Distinction between atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia and atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia in the adult population based on P wave location; should we reconsider the value of some ECG criteria according to gender and age? Europace. 2003;5(1):57–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Arruda MS, McClelland JH, Wang X, et al. Development and validation of an ECG algorithm for identifying accessory pathway ablation site in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998;9(1):2–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fitzpatrick AP, Gonzales RP, Lesh MD, Modin GW, Lee RJ, Scheinman MM. New algorithm for the localization of accessory atrioventricular connections using a baseline electrocardiogram. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23(1):107–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Keating L, Morris FP, Brady WJ. Electrocardiographic features of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Emerg Med J. 2003;20(5):491–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vereckei A, Duray G, Szenasi G, Altemose GT, Miller JM. Application of a new algorithm in the differential diagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardia. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(5):589–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brugada P, Brugada J, Mont L, Smeets J, Andries EW. A new approach to the differential diagnosis of a regular tachycardia with a wide QRS complex. Circulation. 1991;83(5):1649–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kindwall KE, Brown J, Josephson ME. Electrocardiographic criteria for ventricular tachycardia in wide complex left bundle branch block morphology tachycardias. Am J Cardiol. 1988;61(15):1279–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pava LF, Perafan P, Badiel M, et al. R-wave peak time at DII: a new criterion for differentiating between wide complex QRS tachycardias. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7(7):922–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pelliccia A, Zipes DP, Maron BJ. Bethesda Conference #36 and the European Society of Cardiology Consensus Recommendations revisited a comparison of U.S. and European criteria for eligibility and disqualification of competitive athletes with cardiovascular abnormalities. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(24):1990–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rao U, Agarwal A. Importance of Q waves in early diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Heart. 2011;97(23):1993–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Antzelevitch C, Brugada P, Borggrefe M, et al. Brugada syndrome: report of the second consensus conference: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society and the European Heart Rhythm Association. Circulation. 2005;111(5):659–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Antzelevitch C, Brugada P, Brugada J, Brugada R. Brugada syndrome: from cell to bedside. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2005;30(1):9–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Priori SG, Napolitano C, Gasparini M, et al. Natural history of Brugada syndrome: insights for risk stratification and management. Circulation. 2002;105(11):1342–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brugada J, Brugada R, Antzelevitch C, Towbin J, Nademanee K, Brugada P. Long-term follow-up of individuals with the electrocardiographic pattern of right bundle-branch block and ST-segment elevation in precordial leads V1 to V3. Circulation. 2002;105(1):73–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Viskin S. Torsades de Pointes. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 1999;1(2):187–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lepeschkin E, Surawicz B. The measurement of the Q-T interval of the electrocardiogram. Circulation. 1952;6(3):378–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jackman WM, Friday KJ, Anderson JL, Aliot EM, Clark M, Lazzara R. The long QT syndromes: a critical review, new clinical observations and a unifying hypothesis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1988;31(2):115–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schwartz PJ, Priori SG, Spazzolini C, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlation in the long-QT syndrome: gene-specific triggers for life-threatening arrhythmias. Circulation. 2001;103(1):89–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Priori SG, Schwartz PJ, Napolitano C, et al. Risk stratification in the long-QT syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(19):1866–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schwartz PJ, Crotti L. QTc behavior during exercise and genetic testing for the long-QT syndrome. Circulation. 2011;124(20):2181–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction; a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(3):E1–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Haissaguerre M, Derval N, Sacher F, et al. Sudden cardiac arrest associated with early repolarization. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(19):2016–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tikkanen JT, Junttila MJ, Anttonen O, et al. Early repolarization: electrocardiographic phenotypes associated with favorable long-term outcome. Circulation. 2011;123(23):2666–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Viskin S, Rosso R, Halkin A. Making sense of early repolarization. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(4):566–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Antzelevitch C, Yan GX. J wave syndromes. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7(4):549–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Aizawa Y, Sato A, Watanabe H, et al. Dynamicity of the J-wave in idiopathic ventricular fibrillation with a special reference to pause-dependent augmentation of the J-wave. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(22):1948–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Littmann L, Monroe MH. Electrocardiographic artifact. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(8):590–1; author reply 592.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Krasnow AZ, Bloomfield DK. Artifacts in portable electrocardiographic monitoring. Am Heart J. 1976;91(3):349–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Patel SI, Souter MJ. Equipment-related electrocardiographic artifacts: causes, characteristics, consequences, and correction. Anesthesiology. 2008;108(1):138–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Adams-Hamoda MG, Caldwell MA, Stotts NA, Drew BJ. Factors to consider when analyzing 12-lead electrocardiograms for evidence of acute myocardial ischemia. Am J Crit Care. 2003;12(1):9–16; quiz 17–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mirvis DM, Berson AS, Goldberger AL, et al. Instrumentation and practice standards for electrocardiographic monitoring in special care units. A report for health professionals by a Task Force of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1989;79(2):464–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nitish Badhwar MBBS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

El Hage, L., Badhwar, N., Goldschlager, N. (2014). Top Ten Electrocardiographic (ECG) Abnormalities Not to Miss. In: Stergiopoulos, K., Brown, D. (eds) Evidence-Based Cardiology Consult. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4441-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4441-0_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4440-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4441-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics