Skip to main content

Modeling and Control of Space Robots

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intelligent Mechatronic Systems

Abstract

This chapter concerns a space robotics application where both trajectory and force/moment control strategies are studied. The space robot is a nonholonomic system with a floating base and its model and control law formulations are fundamentally different from those of a ground-based robot. This chapter gives a detailed account of space vehicle and robot arm dynamics and builds on from those to develop a bond graph model of the space robot. Rigid body mechanics for nonholonomic systems is thoroughly revisited and used in dynamic model development. Two degrees-of-freedom and three degrees-of-freedom space robots are considered as examples. Trajectory and hybrid trajectory/force control (or impedance control) for the two robots are addressed separately. Switching controllers for adaptive gain modulation and positional error (amnesia) recovery during impedance control are implemented. The model is built using a hierarchical object-oriented approach and the integration of control laws with the physical system has been handled systematically. The controller design has been validated through numerical simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A part of this section is adapted from these authors’ previous work published in [16].

  2. 2.

    A part of this section is adapted from these authors’ previous work published in [17, 18].

References

  1. V. Bende, P.M. Pathak, K.S. Dixit, S.P. Harsha, Energy optimal trajectory planning of an underwater robot using a genetic algorithm. Proc. IMechE. Part I: J. Syst. Control Eng. 226(8), 1077–1087 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.J. Craig, Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Didot, J. Dettmann, S. Losito, D. Torfs, G. Colombina, Jerico: a demonstration of autonomous robotic servicing on the mir space station. Robot. Auton. Syst. 23, 29–36 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics (Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Hirzinger, B. Brunner, J. Dietrich, J. Heindl, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 3, pp. 2604–2611, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. Hogan, Impedance control: an approach to manipulation: parts I–III. Trans. ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 107, 1–24 (1985)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. D.C. Karnopp, D.L. Margolis, R.C. Rosenberg, System Dynamics: Modeling and Simulation of Mechatronic Systems (Wiley, New Jersey, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. C.S. Kumar, Shaping the interaction behavior of manipulators through additional passive degrees of freedom: a new approach to impedance control. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.S. Kumar, A. Mukherjee, M.A. Faruqi, Some finer aspects of impedance modulation on hybrid tracking and force controlled manipulators, in Proceedings of International Conference on Bond Graph Modeling and, Simulation (ICBGM’1993), 1993

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Mohan Kumar, Accommodation and force control in tracking and manipulation through virtual dissipative degrees of freedom. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Mugnuolo, S. Di Pippo, P.G. Magnani, E. Re, The spider manipulation system (sms) the Italian approach to space automation. Robot. Auton. Syst. 23, 79–88 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Mukherjee, R. Karmakar, A.K. Samantaray, Bond Graph in Modeling, Simulation and Fault Identification (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2006) ISBN: 978-8188237968, 1420058657

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Nakamura, R. Mukherjee, Non-holonomic path planning of space robots via a bidirectional approach. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 7(4), 500–514 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Oda, Experiences and lessons learned from the ETS-vii robot satellite, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, pp. 914–919, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Oda, Y. Ohkami, Coordinated control of spacecraft attitude and space manipulators. Control Eng. Pract. 5(1), 11–21 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. P.M. Pathak, R.P. Kumar, A. Mukherjee, A. Dasgupta, A scheme for robust trajectory control of space robots. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 16, 1337–1349 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. P.M. Pathak, A. Mukherjee, A. Dasgupta, Impedance control of space robot. Int. J. Modell. Simul. 26(4), 316–322 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. P.M. Pathak, A. Mukherjee, A. Dasgupta, Impedance control of space robots using passive degrees of freedom in controller domain. Trans. ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 127, 564–578 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. P.M. Pathak, Strategies for trajectory, attitude, and impedance control of space robots. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, I.I.T., Kharagpur, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  20. P.M. Pathak, A. Mukherjee, A. Dasgupta, Object oriented bond graph modeling of a space robot, in National Conference on Machines and Mechanisms (NaCoMM), IIT Delhi, India, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. Periasamy, T. Asokan, M. Singaperumal, Investigations on the dynamic coupling in AUV-manipulator system and the manipulator trajectory errors using bond graph method. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 43(6), 1104–1122 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. P. Putz, Space robotics in Europe: a survey. Robot. Auton. Syst. 23, 3–16 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Raibert, J. Craig, Hybrid position/force control of manipulators. Trans. ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Contr. 102, 126–133 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. C. Sallaberger, Canadian space robotics activities. Acta Astronaut. 41(4), 239–246 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. P.Th.L.M. Woerkom, A.K. Misra, Robotic manipulators in space: a dynamic and control perspective. Acta Astronaut. 38, 411–421 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rochdi Merzouki .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Merzouki, R., Samantaray, A.K., Pathak, P.M., Ould Bouamama, B. (2013). Modeling and Control of Space Robots. In: Intelligent Mechatronic Systems. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4628-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4628-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4627-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4628-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics