Abstract
This chapter concerns a space robotics application where both trajectory and force/moment control strategies are studied. The space robot is a nonholonomic system with a floating base and its model and control law formulations are fundamentally different from those of a ground-based robot. This chapter gives a detailed account of space vehicle and robot arm dynamics and builds on from those to develop a bond graph model of the space robot. Rigid body mechanics for nonholonomic systems is thoroughly revisited and used in dynamic model development. Two degrees-of-freedom and three degrees-of-freedom space robots are considered as examples. Trajectory and hybrid trajectory/force control (or impedance control) for the two robots are addressed separately. Switching controllers for adaptive gain modulation and positional error (amnesia) recovery during impedance control are implemented. The model is built using a hierarchical object-oriented approach and the integration of control laws with the physical system has been handled systematically. The controller design has been validated through numerical simulations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
V. Bende, P.M. Pathak, K.S. Dixit, S.P. Harsha, Energy optimal trajectory planning of an underwater robot using a genetic algorithm. Proc. IMechE. Part I: J. Syst. Control Eng. 226(8), 1077–1087 (2012)
J.J. Craig, Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1986)
F. Didot, J. Dettmann, S. Losito, D. Torfs, G. Colombina, Jerico: a demonstration of autonomous robotic servicing on the mir space station. Robot. Auton. Syst. 23, 29–36 (1998)
H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics (Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, 1998)
G. Hirzinger, B. Brunner, J. Dietrich, J. Heindl, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 3, pp. 2604–2611, 1994
N. Hogan, Impedance control: an approach to manipulation: parts I–III. Trans. ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 107, 1–24 (1985)
D.C. Karnopp, D.L. Margolis, R.C. Rosenberg, System Dynamics: Modeling and Simulation of Mechatronic Systems (Wiley, New Jersey, 2006)
C.S. Kumar, Shaping the interaction behavior of manipulators through additional passive degrees of freedom: a new approach to impedance control. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, 1994
C.S. Kumar, A. Mukherjee, M.A. Faruqi, Some finer aspects of impedance modulation on hybrid tracking and force controlled manipulators, in Proceedings of International Conference on Bond Graph Modeling and, Simulation (ICBGM’1993), 1993
S. Mohan Kumar, Accommodation and force control in tracking and manipulation through virtual dissipative degrees of freedom. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, 1996
R. Mugnuolo, S. Di Pippo, P.G. Magnani, E. Re, The spider manipulation system (sms) the Italian approach to space automation. Robot. Auton. Syst. 23, 79–88 (1998)
A. Mukherjee, R. Karmakar, A.K. Samantaray, Bond Graph in Modeling, Simulation and Fault Identification (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2006) ISBN: 978-8188237968, 1420058657
Y. Nakamura, R. Mukherjee, Non-holonomic path planning of space robots via a bidirectional approach. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 7(4), 500–514 (1991)
M. Oda, Experiences and lessons learned from the ETS-vii robot satellite, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, pp. 914–919, 2000
M. Oda, Y. Ohkami, Coordinated control of spacecraft attitude and space manipulators. Control Eng. Pract. 5(1), 11–21 (1997)
P.M. Pathak, R.P. Kumar, A. Mukherjee, A. Dasgupta, A scheme for robust trajectory control of space robots. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 16, 1337–1349 (2008)
P.M. Pathak, A. Mukherjee, A. Dasgupta, Impedance control of space robot. Int. J. Modell. Simul. 26(4), 316–322 (2006)
P.M. Pathak, A. Mukherjee, A. Dasgupta, Impedance control of space robots using passive degrees of freedom in controller domain. Trans. ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 127, 564–578 (2005)
P.M. Pathak, Strategies for trajectory, attitude, and impedance control of space robots. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, I.I.T., Kharagpur, 2004
P.M. Pathak, A. Mukherjee, A. Dasgupta, Object oriented bond graph modeling of a space robot, in National Conference on Machines and Mechanisms (NaCoMM), IIT Delhi, India, 2003
T. Periasamy, T. Asokan, M. Singaperumal, Investigations on the dynamic coupling in AUV-manipulator system and the manipulator trajectory errors using bond graph method. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 43(6), 1104–1122 (2012)
P. Putz, Space robotics in Europe: a survey. Robot. Auton. Syst. 23, 3–16 (1998)
M. Raibert, J. Craig, Hybrid position/force control of manipulators. Trans. ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Contr. 102, 126–133 (1981)
C. Sallaberger, Canadian space robotics activities. Acta Astronaut. 41(4), 239–246 (1997)
P.Th.L.M. Woerkom, A.K. Misra, Robotic manipulators in space: a dynamic and control perspective. Acta Astronaut. 38, 411–421 (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Merzouki, R., Samantaray, A.K., Pathak, P.M., Ould Bouamama, B. (2013). Modeling and Control of Space Robots. In: Intelligent Mechatronic Systems. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4628-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4628-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4627-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4628-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)