Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

The determination of the appropriate crop management is a key factor for the successful insertion of the crop in the existing cropping systems with economic benefits. Research on crop management has been conducted when kenaf was evaluated as an excellent cellulose fiber source for a large range of paper products (in 1960s). The most important parameters in the crop management that should be followed are the site of its cultivation and the final end use. New kenaf varieties have been released that were resistant to pests and diseases with improved resistant to drought, and with higher yields. The plant density and the fertilization need to be varied according to its final use of the crop. When it is cultivated for its fiber stem the plant population should be from 170,000 to 350,000 plants per ha and with row spacing 35–50 cm. In areas where the precipitation is limited irrigation is needed to achieve high yields. It is a crop very sensitive to nematodes, especially when it is cultivated in areas with sandy soil and this should be taken under consideration on the rotation system that will be followed. Harvesting time and methods can be adjusted according to the use of the crop (fiber, seeds, fiber and seeds, forage).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adamson WC, Long FL, Bagby MO (1979) Effect of nitrogen fertilization on yield, composition, and quality of kenaf. Agron J 71:11–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adamson WC, Stone EG, Winton NA (1974) Field resistance to the Javanese root-knot nematode in kenaf. Crop Sci 14:334–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adamson WC, White A, Higgins JJ (1972) Variation in leaf development and dry matter yield among kenaf varieties and introductions. Crop Sci 12:341–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adenyi MO (1970) Reactions of kenaf and roselle varieties to the root-knot nematodes in Nigeria. Plant Dis Report 54:547–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexopoulou E, Christou M, Mardikis M, Chatziathanassiou A (2000a) Growth and yields of kenaf in Central Greece. Ind Crops Prod 11:163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexopoulou E, Kipriotis E, Christou M, Mardikis M, Georgiadis S (2000b) The yielding potential of kenaf in Greece. In: Proceeedig of the 1st world biomass conference

    Google Scholar 

  • Amankwatia YO, Takyi SK (1975) Some fertilizer experiments with kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) in Ghana. I, Preliminary studies on the effects of different levels of nitrogen on the growth and fibere yield of kenaf. Ghana J Agric Sci 8(2):127–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin BS, Hollowell JE, Wosley JW, Cossar RD (2006) Registration of “Whitten” kenaf. Crop Sci 46:988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin B, Kurtz M, Hovermale C, Neil SW (1996) Kenaf: a Guide for production in Mississippi. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station Research report, vol. 21, no. 8, Mississippi State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Banuelos GS, Bryla DR, Cook CG (2002) Vegetative production of kenaf and canola under irrigation in central California. Ind Crops Prod 15:237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belocchi A, Quaranta F, Desiderio E (1998) Yield and adaptability of kenaf varieties (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) for paper pulping in central Italy. Sustainable Agriculture for Food, Energy and Industry, James & James (Science Publishers) Ltd., London, pp 1039–1049

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentini M, Pasini P, Venturi P, Baraldi G (1994) Meccanizzazione e raccolta della coltura. In: Vannini L, Venturi G (eds). Il kenaf: materia prima per l’ industria. L’ Informatore Agrario, pp 69–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhangoo MS, Cook CG (1998a) Regional uniform kenaf variety and new breeding lines in California. In: Proceedings of the first annual conference of the American kenaf society, pp 13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhangoo MS, Cook CG (1998b) Effect of soil salinity on kenaf performance in California, 1997. In: Proceedings of the first annual conference of the American kenaf society, pp 21–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhangoo MS, Tehrani HS, Henderson J (1986) Effect of planning date, nitrogen levels, row spacing and plant population on kenaf performance in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Agron J 78:600–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campell TA, White GA (1982) Population density and planting date effects on kenaf performance. Agron J 74:74–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catling PM (1982) Breeding systems of northeastern North American spiranthes (orchidaceae). Can J Bot 60:3017–3039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen LH, Pote J, Fuller M (1995) Decorticating machine with variable speed feed and beater rollers. Patent number 5,465,464. U.S. Patent Office, 14 Nov 1995

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen LH, Pote J (1994) In-field separation of kenaf. pp 19–20. In Fuller MJ (ed) A summary of kenaf production and product development research 1989–1993, Bulletin 1011. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Mississippi State, MS, Bulletin 1011, 33 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew WY, Abdul Malek MA, Ramli K (1982) Nitrogen and potassium fertilization of Congo Jute (Urena lobata) and kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) on Malaysian peat. MARDI Res Bull 10(3):317–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Ching A, Webber III CL (1993) Effect of fertilizer applications on kenaf photosynthesis, growth and yield. In: Proceeding of the fourth international kenaf conference, International Kenaf Association, Ladonia, TX, pp 17–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Ching A, Webber CL III, Neil SW (1993) Effect of location and cultivar on kenaf yield components. Ind Crops Prod 1:191–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark TF, Wolff IA (1969) A search for new fiber crops, XI. Compositional characteristics of Illinois kenaf at several population densities and maturities. TAPPI 52:2606–2116

    Google Scholar 

  • Columbus EP, Fuller MJ (1999) Factors affecting kenaf fiber and core separation. In: Kenaf properties: processing and products. Mississippi State University, Mississippi, pp 83–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook C, Escobar D, Everitt J, Cavazos I, Robinson F, Davis R (1998) Airborne video monitoring of root-knot nematode damage in kenaf. In: Proceedings of the first annual conference of the American Kenaf Society, pp 145–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook C, Scott A, Sij J (1999) Release of kenaf cultivars “Gregg” and “Dowling”. In: Proceedings of the second annual conference of the American Kenaf Society, pp 138–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooperative State Research Service (CSRS) (1988) New harvester: a big step toward commercial kenaf production. USDA Photography Division, Washington, Photo Feature #322, 4 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane JC (1947) Kenaf: fibre-plant, rival of jute. Econ Bot 1:334–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danalatos NG, Archontoulis SV (2010) Growth and biomass productivity of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus, L.) under different agricultural inputs and management practices in central Greece. Ind Crops Prod 32:231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey JM (1975) Fiber crops. The University Press of Florida, Florida, p 457

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBard K, Baldwin B (1999) Preliminary investigations on biomass production of Mississippi-grown kenaf. In: Proceedings of the second annual conference of the American Kenaf Society, pp 149–154

    Google Scholar 

  • El Bassam N, Huisman W (2001) Harvesting and storage of Miscanthus. In: Jones MB, Walsh M (eds) Miscanthus for energy and fibre. James and James Science Publication, London, pp 86–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans DW, Hang AH (1993) Kenaf in irrigated central Washington. In: Janick J, Simon JE (eds) New crops. Wiley, New York, pp 409–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahmy R, Aboushoba L, Hella AM, Abdel Salam SA (1985) The effect of plant population levels on growth, yield, and fiber quality of kenaf. Agric Res Rev 63:137–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando A, Duarte P, Morai J, Cartoga A, Serras G, Pizza S, Godovikova V, Oliveira JL (2004a) Characterization of kenaf potential in Portugal as an industrial and energy feedstock. The effect of irrigation, nitrogen fertilization and different harvest dates. In: Proceeding of the 2nd world conference on biomass for energy, industry and climate protection (Rome, 10–14/5/2004), pp 169–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando A, Duarte P, Morai J, Cartoga A, Serras G, Pizza S, Godovikova V, Oliveira JL (2004b) Characterization of kenaf potential in Portugal as an industrial and energy feedstock. The effect of different varieties, sowing dates, plant population and different harvest dates. In: Proceeding of the 2nd world conference on biomass for energy, industry and climate protection (Rome, 10–14/5/2004), pp. 281–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Francois LE, Donovan TJ, Maas EV (1990) Salt tolerance of kenaf. In: Janick J, Simon JE (eds) Advances in new crops. Timber Press, Portland, pp 300–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser L, Beach D (1993). Industrial uses of agricultural materials situation and outlook report. United States Department of Agriculture, IUS-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham JW, Bladwin BS (1999) Effect of plant population and row spacing on the bast:core ration of kenaf. In: Proceedings of the Second annual conference of the American Kenaf Society, pp 58–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Haarer AE (1952) Some observations on the cultivation of kenaf. Econ. Botany 6:18–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickman MV (1990) Pre-emergence Herbicides for kenaf production. In: kenaf research, development and commercialization. Proceeding from the Association for the Advancement of Industrial Crops. Annual conference, Peoria, Illinois, p 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins JJ, White GA (1970) Effects of plant population and harvest date on stem yield and growth components of kenaf in Maryland. Agron J 62:667–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollowell JE (1997) Nutritional and yield evaluation of kenaf (H. cannabinus L.) as a potential high quality forage for the southern United States. MS thesis, Mississippi State University, Mississippi

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovermale CH (1993) Effect of row width and nitrogen rate on biomass yield of kenaf. In: Proceeding fourth International kenaf conference, International Kenaf Association, Ladonia, TX, pp 35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman W, Venturi P (2003) Pretreatment and storage of fibre crops. In: Proceeding of the international South Europe symposium. Non-food crops: from agriculture to industry. Bologna, Italy, 16–17 May 2003. http://www.ienica.net/italyseminar/fibres/huisman.pdf

  • Ibrahim IKA, Rezk MA, Khalil HAA (1982) Reaction of fifteen malvaceous plant cultivars to root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne spp. Nematol Medot 10:135–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyner JF, Fishler DF, Wilson FD (1965) Fertility studies in kenaf. In: Proceeding of the second international kenaf conference, Palm Beach, FL, pp 105–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemble LJ, Krishnan P, Henning KJ, Tilmon HD (2002) Development and evaluation of kenaf harvesting technology. Biosyst Eng 81:49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi Y, Otsuka K, Taniwaki K, Sugimoto M, Kobayashi K (2003) Development of kenaf harvesting technology using a modified sugarcane harvester. JARQ 37(1):65–69. http://www.jircas.affrcgo.jp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok CJ, Coenen GCM, de Heij A (1994) The effect of fibre hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) on selected soil-borne pathogens. J Int Hemp Assoc 1:6–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen EF (1999) Storage of winter harvested miscanthus. European Energy Crops InterNetwork, Biobase

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz ME (1994a) Tolerance of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) to post-emergence directed herbicides. Ind Crops Prod 3:145–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz ME (1994b) Weed control in kenaf. In: Fuller MJ (ed), A summary of kenaf production and product development research 1989–1993. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment State, Mississippi, Bulletin 1011, pp 10–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz ME (1996) Kenaf tolerance to acifluorfen, cyanazine, diuron, fluometuron, fomesafen, or prometryn applied postemergence-directed. Ind Crops Prod 5:119–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz ME, Neill S (1992) Tolerance of kenaf to selected post-mergence herbicides. Wood Technol 6:125–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz ME, Neill SW (1990) Effect of herbicides on kenaf. In: Kenaf Research, Development and Commercialization. Proceeding from the Association for the Advancement of Industrial Crops. Annual conference, Peoria, Illinois, pp. 15–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakshminarayana A, Krishna Murty R, Rama Rao M, Appa Rao P (1980) Efficiency of nitrogen utilization by roselle and kenaf. Indian J Agric Sci 50:244–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence GW (1994) Plant parasitic nematodes-pests of kenaf, pp 13–14. In: Fuller MJ (ed) A summary of kenaf production and product development research 1989–1993. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Expeiment State, Mississippi, Bulletin 1011, 33 pages

    Google Scholar 

  • LeMahieu PJ, Oplinger ES, Putnam DH (2000) Kenaf. http://hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/afcum/kenaf.html

  • Li D (2002) Kenaf production research and development in China. International Kenaf symposium, T.N.USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mambelli S, Grandi S (1995) Yield and quality of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) stem as affected by harvest date and irrigation. Ind Crops Prod 4:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzanares M, Tenorio JL, Manzanares P, Ayebre L (1993) Yield and development of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) crop in relation to water supply and intercepted radiation. Biomass Bioenergy 5(5):337–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey JH (1974) Effects of nitrogen levels and row widths on kenaf. Agron J 66:822–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillin JD, Wagner MR, Webber CL III, Mann SS, Nichols JD, Jech L (1998) Potential for kenaf cultivation in south-central Arizona. Ind Crops Prod 9:73–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPartland JM, Glass M (2001) Nematicidal effects of hemp (Cannabis sativa) may not be mediated by cannabinoid receptors. New Zeal J Crop Hort Sci 29:301–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muchow RC (1979a) I Effects of plant population and season on kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) grown under irrigation in tropical Australia. 1. Influence on the components of yield. Field Crops Res 2:55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muchow RC (1979b) II Effects of plant population and season on kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) grown under irrigation in tropical. Seed yield and stem yield at maturity. Field Crops Res 3:27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muchow RC (1979c) III Effects of plant population and season on kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) grown under irrigation in tropical Australia. Influence on growth parameters and yield prediction. Field Crops Res 2:67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muchow RC (1992) Effect of water and nitrogen supply on radiation interception and biomass accumulation of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) in a semi-arid tropical environment. Field Crops Res 28:281–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muchow RC, Wood IM (1980) Yield and growth responses of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.), in a semi-arid tropical environment, to irrigation regimes based on leaf water potential. Irrig Sci 1:209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muchow RC, Wood IM (1981) Pattern of infiltration with furrow irrigation and evaportanspiration of keanf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) grown on Cununurra clay in the Ord Irrigation Area. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 21:101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naffes M, Kanzanda SP (1983) Effect of plant population on green stalk and fibre yields of Jute and Kenaf varieties. Pakistan J Agric Res 4:111–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Neil SW, Kurtz ME (1994) The effect of plant population on kenaf yield. In Fuller MJ (ed) A summary of kenaf production and product development research 1989–1993. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment State, Mississippi, Bulletin 1011, p 33

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson EG, Wilson FD (1965) Inheritance in kenaf as related selection of inbred lines for composite varieties. Tech Bull USDA 1319:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogbonnaya CI, Nwalozie MC, Roy-Macauley H, Annerose DJM (1998) Growth and water relations of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) under water deficit on a sandy soil. Ind Crops Prod 8:65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogbonnaya CI, Roy-Macauley H, Nwalozie MC, Annerose DJM (1997) Physical and hystochemical properties of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) grown under water deficit on a sandy soil. Ind Crops Prod 7:9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pate JB, Joyner JF (1958) The inheritance of a male sterility factor in kenaf, Hibiscus cannabinus L. Agron J 50:402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pate JB, Summers TE, Menzel MY (1958) Resistance of Hibiscus etveldianus to root-knot nematode and the possibility of its use as a source of resistance in kenaf, Hibiscus cannabinus L. Plant Dis Report 42:796–797

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil RC, Thombre MV (1980) Heterosis and combining ability studies in Hibiscus cannabinus (L). JMAU 5:123–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Pertini C, Bazzocchi R, Montalti P (1994) Yield potential and adaptation of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) in North-Central Italy. L’Informatore Agrario 3:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrini C, Belletti A (1991) Kenaf: adaptability and productivity potentialities in the North Centre of Italy. In: Biomass for energy, industry and envoronment, 6th E.C. conference, Athens, pp 292–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson AF, Cook CG (2001) Root-knot and reniform nematode reproduction on kenaf and sunnhemp compared with that on nematode resistant and susceptible cotton. Ind Crops Prod 13:249–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson FE (1990) Irrigation of kenaf in a desert. In: USDA CSRS (ed) Kenaf research, development and commercialization. In: Proceedings from the association for the advancement of industrial crops. 5 October, Peoria, IL, pp 23–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson MC, Fowler SM, Lampkin NH, Leifert C, Leitch M, Robinson D (2002) The agronomic and economic potential of break crops for ley/arable rotations in temperate organic agriculture. Adv Agron 77: 369–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Salih FA (1978) Effects of population densities and row spacing on kenaf yields and its components in the Kenana area of the Sudan. Acta Acad Sci Hung 27:349–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Salih FA (1982) Effect of variety, sowing date and nitrogen on kenaf yields in the Kenana area of the Sudan. Acta Agron Acad Sci Hung 31:58–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Salih FA (1983) Effects of population densities and nitrogen levels on kenaf yields and its components in the Kenana area of the Sudan. J Agron Crop Sci 152:48–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarma TC, Ali F, Boldloi DN, Chalika BP, Baruah JN (1996) Studies on biomass production of kenaf. (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). In: Proceedings of symposium on plantation opportunities in India plantation crops: opportunities and constraints, Vol. 1. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Dehli, pp 143–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarma TC, Bordoloi DN (1995) Yield and pulpable biomass of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) varieties under various row spacings and nitrogen. Indian J Agron 40:722–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott AW (1990) Plant population density and dates of harvest on kenaf fiber production in the lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas. In: Kenaf research, development and commercialization. Proceeding from the association for the advancement of industrial crops. Annual conference, Peoria, Illinois, pp 27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott AW, Cook CG, Taylor S (1999) The effects of harvest timing on kenaf and sunn hemp. In: Proceedings of the second annual conference of the American Kenaf Society, pp 37–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Siepe T, Ventrella D, Lapenta E (1997) Evaluation of genetic in a collection of Hibiscus cannabinus (L.) and Hibiscus spp (L.). Ind Crops Prod 6:343–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sij JW, Turner FT (1988) Varietal evaluations and fertility requirements of kenaf in Southeast Texas. Texas Agr Expt Sta, Bul

    Google Scholar 

  • Stivastava SK, Pandey BP, Lal RS (1978) Combing ability in a six-parent diallel cross in Mesta. Ind J Agric Sci 49:724–730

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber CL, Bledsoe RE (1993) Kenaf. production, harvesting, processing and products. In: Janick J, Simon JE (eds) New crops. Wiley, New York, pp 416–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber CL III (1999) Effect of kenaf and soybean rotations on yield components. In: Janick J (ed) Perspectives on new crops and new uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber CL III (1993) Yield components of five kenaf cultivars. In: Agron Jl 85:533–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webber CL III (1994) Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) response to four grass control herbicides broadcast post-emergence. Weed Technol 8:457–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber CL III, Bhardwaj HL, Bledsoe VK (2002) Kenaf production: fiber, feed, and seed. In: Janick J, Whipkey A (eds) Trends in new crops and new uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber III CL, Bhardwaj HL, Bledsoe VK (1996) Kenaf product. Response of kenaf to nitrogen fertilization. In: Proceeding of the third national symposium. new crops, new opportunities, new technologies, pp 404–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiland RT, Stuttle CA (1980) Concomitant determination of foliar nitrogen loss, net carbon uptake, and transpiration. Plant Physiol 65:403–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White GA (1969) A research for new fiber crops 12, Field yields of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). TAPPI 52(4): 565–659

    Google Scholar 

  • White GA, Adamson WC, Higgins JJ (1971) Effect of population levels on growth factors in kenaf varieties. Agron J 63: 233–235

    Google Scholar 

  • White GA, Higgins JJ (1965) Growing kenaf for paper. In: Proceeding of second international kenaf conference, Palm Beach, FL, pp 27–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitely EL (1981) Kenaf Hibiscus cannabinus (production, cultural practices, composition). In: Zaporsky OR, McLure TA, Lipinsky ES (eds) Handbook of biosolar resources. CRC Press Inc, Boca Raton, pp 259–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JH (1966) Influence of row spacing and nitrogen levels on dry matter yields of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Agron J 58:166–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams RL (1994) Genetic variation of the control of flowering in kenaf with emphasis on the ambiphotoperiodic response of cultivar Guatemala 4. Ind Crops Prod 2:161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson FD, Summers TE (1966) Reaction of kenaf, roselle, and related species of Hibiscus to root-knot nematodes. Phytopathology 56:687–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood IM, Muchow RC (1980) Estimation of optimal rate of application of nitrogen for kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L) harvested at different ages for paper pulp production. Tropical Agronomy Technical Memorandum. ISSN 0157-9711

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood I, Angus JF (1976) Kenaf versus forests as a source of paper pulp. Aust For 39: 23–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Y (2004) The application of integrated control technique of kenaf root-knot nematode. Guangxi Agric Sci 1:24–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Zegada-Lizarazu W, Monti A (2011) Energy crops in rotation, a review. Biomass Bioenergy 35:12–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Noe JP (1996) Damage potential and reproduction of Meloidogyne incognita race 3 and M. arenaria race 1 on kenaf. Suppl J Nematol 28:668–675

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Alexopoulou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alexopoulou, E., Papatheohari, Y., Picco, D., Di Virgilio, N., Monti, A. (2013). Crop Management. In: Monti, A., Alexopoulou, E. (eds) Kenaf: A Multi-Purpose Crop for Several Industrial Applications. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5067-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5067-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5066-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5067-1

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics