Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental Aspects of Kenaf Production and Use

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Kenaf: A Multi-Purpose Crop for Several Industrial Applications

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

This chapter outlines the environmental aspects of kenaf production and utilization, focusing on the impact on biotic and abiotic resources, through the analysis of the crop’s interaction with its environment and management practices. In this study, the assessment of data retrieved from literature was supplemented with results obtained from the Biokenaf project. As a bioenergy and biomaterials carrier, kenaf offers ecological advantages over fossil sources by contributing to reduction of greenhouse gases and energy savings. Nevertheless, a negative impact may be perceived in terms of acidifying emissions. Although the different indicators did not yield a common pattern, overall results suggest that kenaf crop have an advantage over other annual energy crop systems, namely regarding pesticides and fertilizers inputs. However, risks associated with soil quality, erodibility, use of resources, and biodiversity are equivalent to most annual energy crops. Crop management options can influence the outcomes, but site specific factors should be accurately assessed to evaluate the adequacy between crop and location. In addition, environmental hot spots in the systems are detected and options for improvement are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abe K, Ozaki Y (2007) Wastewater treatment by using Kenaf in paddy soil and effect of dissolved oxygen concentration on efficiency. Ecol Eng 29:125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexopoulou E, Cosentino SL, Danalatos N, Venturi G, Fernando AL, Tenorio JL, Cadoux S, Veccheit M, Kipriotis E (2009) Biomass yields of kenaf in Europe: effect of site, year and cultural practices on yields. In: De Santi GF, Dallemand JF, Ossenbrink H, Grassi A, Helm P (eds) Proceedings of the 17th European biomass conference and exhibition, from research to industry and markets, pp 138–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardente F, Beccali M, Cellura M, Mistretta M (2008) Building energy performance: a LCA case study of kenaf-fibres insulation board. Energ Buildings 40:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson CJ (2009) Establishing perennial grass energy crops in the UK: a review of current propagation options for Miscanthus. Biomass Bioenerg 33:752–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bañuelos G, Bryla D, Cook C (2002) Vegetative production of kenaf and canola under irrigation in central California. Ind Crops Prod 15:237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bañuelos GS, Ajwa HA, Mackey B, Wu L, Cook CG, Akohoue S, Zambruzuski S (1997) Evaluation of different plant species used for phytoremediation of high soil selenium. J Environ Qual 26:639–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa B, Fernando AL, Mendes B (2012) Wastewater reuse in the irrigation of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L) as a strategy for combating desertification. Proceedings of the world forum on soil bioengineering and land management new challenges, in press

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa BMG (2010) Utilização de águas residuais tratadas na irrigação de Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.)—efeito do ião amónio. Mestrado em Energia e Bioenergia, FCT/UNL, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg Å (2002) Breeding birds in short-rotation coppices on farmland in central Sweden—the importance of Salix height and adjacent habitats. Agr Ecosyst Environ 90:265–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biewinga EE, van der Bijl G (1996) Sustainability of energy crops in Europe: a methodology developed and applied. CLM, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Boléo SMT (2011) Environmental impact assessment of energy crops cultivation in the mediterranean Europe Mestrado em Energia e Bioenergia. FCT/UNL, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Börjesson P (1999) Environmental effects of energy crop cultivation in Sweden—I: identification and quantification. Biomass Bioenerg 16:137–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catroga A, Fernando A, Oliveira JS (2005) effects on growth, productivity and biomass quality of Kenaf of soils contaminated with heavy metals. In: Sjunnesson L, Carrasco JE, Helm P, Grassi A (eds) Biomass for energy, industry and climate protection—Proceedings of the 14th European biomass conference and exhibition, ETA-Florence, WIP-Munich, pp 149–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Catroga AMD (2009) Contributo para o estudo das potencialidades do Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L) na fitorremediação de solos contaminados com metais pesados Mestrado em Bioenergia. FCT/UNL, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherubini F, Bird ND, Cowie A, Jungmeier G, Schlamadinger B, Woess-Gallasch S (2009) Energy—and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resour Conserv Recy 53:434–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correia FM (2011) Balanço energético da utilização de kenaf na produção de energia e painéis isoladores, em Portugal Mestrado em Energia e Bioenergia. FCT/UNL, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortina J, Amat B, Castillo V, Fuentes D, Maestre F, Padilla F, Rojo L (2011) The restoration of vegetation cover in the semi-arid Iberian southeast. J Arid Environ 75:1377–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauber J, Brown C, Fernando AL, Finnan J, Krasuska E, Ponitka J, Styles D, Thrän D, Van Groeningen KJ, Weih M, Zah R (2012) Bioenergy from “surplus” land: environmental and socio-economic implications. BioRisk 7:5–50. doi:10.3897/biorisk.$$.3036

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauber J, Hirsch M, Simmering D, Waldhardt R, Otte A, Wolters V (2003) Landscape structure as an indicator of biodiversity: matrix effects on species richness. Agric Ecosyst Environ 98:321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delucchi MA, Lipman T. (2003) A lifecycle emissions model (LEM): lifecycle emissions from transportation fuels, motor vehicles, transportation modes, electricity use, heating and cooking fuels, and materials. Appendix C: Emissions related to cultivation and fertilizer use. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Directive 2003/87/CE of the European parliament and of the council of 13 October which establishes a scheme for greenhouse gas emissions trading within the community, Modifying the directive 96/61/CE of the council

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2005) Agriculture and environment in EU-15—the IRENA indicator report. Report No 6/2005. European environment agency. Copenhagen, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2006) How much bioenergy can Europe produce without harming the environment? Report No 7/2006. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • El Bassam N (2010) Handbook of Bioenergy crops—A complete reference to species, development and applications. Earthscan, Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2003) Biological management of doil ecosystems for sustainable agriculture. Report of the International Technical Workshop. Londrina, Brazil, FAO, Rome, Italy, 24–27 June 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando A, Duarte MP, Mendes B (2009) Is Kenaf a sustainable land-use alternative for greenhouse gas emission mitigation in the Mediterranean region? In: De Santi GF, Dallemand JF, Ossenbrink H, Grassi A, Helm P (eds) Proceedings of the 17th European biomass conference and exhibition, from research to industry and markets, pp 2549–2552

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando A, Duarte MP, Morais J, Catroga A, Serras G, Lobato N, Mendes B, Oliveira JFS (2007) Final report of FCT/UNL to the biokenaf project. FCT/UNL, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando A, Morais J, Mendes B, Oliveira JFS (2008) Is kenaf an effective land-use alternative for the energy and industrial sectors in Portugal? Proceedings of the international conference: bioenergy: challenges and opportunities, pp 237–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando AL, Barbosa B, Boléo S, Mendes B (2011) Growth, productivity and biomass quality of Kenaf irrigated with wastewaters—the effect of ammonium ion. In: Faulstich M, Ossenbrink H, Dallemand JF, Baxter D, Grassi A, Helm P (eds) Proceedings of the 19th European biomass conference and exhibition, from research to industry and markets. ETA-Florence Renewable Energies, pp 68–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando AL, Duarte MP, Almeida J, Boléo S, di Virgilio N, Mendes B (2010a) The influence of crop management in the environmental impact of energy crops production. In: Spitzer J, Dallemand JF, Baxter D, Ossenbrink H, Grassi A, Helm P (eds) Proceedings of the 18th European biomass conference and exhibition, from research to industry and markets, 3–7 May 2010, Lyon, France, ETA-Renewable Energies and WIP-Renewable Energies pp 2275–2279

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando AL, Duarte MP, Almeida J, Boléo S, Mendes B (2010b) Final report on task 4.1, environmental impact assessment (EIA) of energy crops production in Europe, 4F crop project, E.U. Grant Agreement No: 212811. FCT/UNL, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando AL, Duarte MP, Almeida J, Boléo S, Mendes B (2010b) Environmental impact assessment (EIA) of Energy crops production in Europe. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 4:594–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernando AL, Duarte MP, Morais J, Catroga A, Serras G, Lobato N, Mendes B, Oliveira JFS (2006) Biomass Production Chain and Growth Simulation Model for kenaf—Biokenaf, Individual progress report for the period 1st April 2005 to 28th February 2006. FCT/UNL, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando AL, Ferreira M, Boléo S, Mendes B, Alexopoulou E (2012) Growth, productivity and biomass quality of kenaf irrigated with wastewaters—the effect of nitrate ion. In: Krantkremer B, Ossenbrink H, Baxter D, Dallemand JF, Grassi A, Helm P (eds) Proceedings of the 20th European biomass conference and exhibition. ETA, pp 179–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira MS (2011) Utilização de Águas Residuais tratadas na irrigação de Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.)—Efeito do ião nitrato. Mestrado em Energia e Bioenergia, FCT/UNL, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • FMW—Swedish defence materiel administration (2007). Listing of GWP values as per report IPCC WG1 AR4

    Google Scholar 

  • Fragoso C, Brown GG, Patron JC, Blanchart E, Lavelle P, Pashanasi B, Senapati B, Kumar T (1997) Agricultural intensification, soil biodiversity and agroecosystem function in the tropics: the role of earthworms. Appl Soil Ecol 6:17–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francois LE, Donovan TJ, Maas EV (1992) Yield vegetative growth, and fiber length of kenaf grown on saline soil. Agron J 84:592–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsche UR, Sims REH, Monti A (2010) Direct and indirect land-use competition issues for energy crops and their sustainable production—an overview. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 4:692–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho W, Ang L, Lee D (2008) Assessment of Pb uptake, translocation and immobilization in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) for phytoremediation of sand tailings. J Environ Sci 20:1341–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC—Intergovernmental panel on climate change (2006) 2006 IPCC Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds). IGES, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones GA, Sieving KE (2006) Intercropping sunflower in organic vegetables to augment bird predators of arthropods. Agric Ecosyst Environ 117:171–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaltschmitt M, Reinhardt GA, Stelzer T (1996) LCA of biofuels under different environmental aspects. In: Chartier P, Ferrero GL, Henius UM, Hultberg S, Sachau J, Wiinblad M (eds.) Biomass for energy and the environment—Proceedings of the 9th European bioenergy conference, vol 1, Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, pp 369–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassam A, Friedrich T, Derpsch R, Lahmar R, Mrabet R, Basch G, González-Sánchez E, Serraj R (2012) Conservation agriculture in the dry Mediterranean climate. Field Crops Res 132:7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MA, Shaukat SS, Khan MA (2009) Growth, yield and nutrient content of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) using treated wastewater from waste stabilization ponds. Pak J Bot 41:1391–1399

    Google Scholar 

  • Kort J, Collins M, Ditsch D (1998) A review of soil erosion potential associated with biomass crops. Biomass Bioenerg 14:351–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasuska E, Cadórniga C, Tenorio J, Testa G, Scordia D (2010) Potencial land availability for energy crops production in Europe. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 4:658–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauriault LM, Puppala N (2009) The influence of rainfed and limited irrigation conditions and early vs. late plantings on kenaf as a potential industrial crop in the southern High Plains USA. Ind Crops Prod 29:549–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowski I, Scurlock J, Lindvall E, Christou M (2003) The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe. Biomass Bioenerg 25:335–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosier AR, Parton WJ, Phongpan S (1998) Long-term large N and immediate small N addition effects on trace gas fluxes in the Colorado shortgrass steppe. Biol Fertil Soils 28:44–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muchow RC (1992) Effect of water and nitrogen supply on radiation interception and biomass accumulation of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) in a semi-arid tropical environment. Field Crops Res 28:281–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD/IEA—Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development/International Energy Agency (2007) Good practice guidelines—bioenergy project development & biomass supply. IEA, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogbonnaya CI, Nwalozie MC, Roy-Maccauley H, Annerose DJM (1998) Growth and water relations of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) under water deficit on a sandy soil. Ind Crops Prod 8:65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira JS, Duarte MP, Christian DG, Eppel-Hotz A, Fernando AL (2001) Environmental aspects of Miscanthus production. In: Jones MB, Walsh M (eds) Miscanthus for energy and fibre. James & James (Science Publishers) Ltd, London, pp 172–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Patanè C, Sortino O (2010) Seed yield in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) as affected by sowing time in South Italy. Ind Crops Prod 32:381–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pervaiz M, Sain MM (2003) Carbon storage potential in natural fiber composites. Resour Conserv Recy 39:325–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picco D (2010) Colture Energetiche per il didinquinamento della laguna di Venezia. Progetto Biocolt. CETA—Centro di Ecologia Teorica ed Applicata, Venetto Agricultura—Azienda Regionale per i Settori Agricolo

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davidson BH, Britovsek G, Cairney J, Eckert CA, Frederick jr WJ, Hallett JP, Leak DJ, Liotta CL, Mielenz JR. Murphy R, Templer R, Tschaplinskl T (2006) The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science 311:484–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettenmaier N, Köppen S, Gärtner S, Reinhardt G (2010a) Life cycle analysis—Final Report on Tasks 4.2 & 4.3 of the 4F Crops Project: Future Crops for Food, Feed, Fiber and Fuel. IFEU—Institute for Energy and Environmental Research Heidelberg GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettenmaier N, Köppen S, Gärtner S, Reinhardt G (2010b) Life cycle assessment of selected future energy crops for Europe. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 4:620–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe RL, Street NR, Taylor G (2009) Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13:271–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Pant D, Korres NE, Nizami A, Prasad S, Murphy JD (2010) Key issues in life cycle assessment of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: challenges and perspectives. Bioresour Technol 101:5003–5012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeets E, Lewandowski I, Faaij A (2009) The economical and environmental performance of miscanthus and switchgrass production and supply chains in European setting. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13:1230–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiertz JHJ, Ewert F (2009) Crop production and resource use to meet the growing demand for food, feed and fuel: opportunities and constraints. NJAS—Wageningen J Life Sci 56:282–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehfest E, Bouwman L (2006) N2O and NO emission from agricultural fields and soils under natural vegetation: summarizing available measurement data modeling of global annual emissions. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 74:207–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dam JEG, Bos HL (2004) The environmental impact of fibre crops in industrial applications. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassilev SV, Baxter D, Andersen LK, Vassileva CG (2010) An overview of the chemical composition of biomass. Fuel 89:913–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venturi G, Monti A (2005) Energia da colture dedicate: aspetti ambientali ed agronomici. Conferenza Nazionale sulla Politica Energetica in Italia

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber CL III (1993) Yield components of five kenaf cultivars. Agron J 85:533–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zan CS, Fyles JW, Girouard P, Samson RA (2001) Carbon sequestration in perennial bioenergy, annual corn and uncultivated systems in southern Quebec. Agric Ecosyst Environ 86:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zegada-Lizarazu W, Elbersen HW, Cosentino SL, Zatta A, Alexopoulou E, Monti A (2010) Agronomic aspects of future energy crops in Europe. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 4:674–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zegada-Lizarazu W, Monti A (2011) Energy crops in rotation. Rev Biomass Bioenergy 35:12–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Ciências e Tecnologia da Biomassa, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Caparica, Portugal

    A. L. Fernando

Authors
  1. A. L. Fernando
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. L. Fernando .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Department of Agroenvironmental Science, University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 44, Bologna, 40127, Italy

    Andrea Monti

  2. and Saving (CRES), Department of Biomass, Center for Renewable Energy Sources, Km Marathonos Avenue 19, Athens, 19009, Greece

    Efthimia Alexopoulou

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fernando, A.L. (2013). Environmental Aspects of Kenaf Production and Use. In: Monti, A., Alexopoulou, E. (eds) Kenaf: A Multi-Purpose Crop for Several Industrial Applications. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5067-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5067-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5066-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5067-1

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation