Abstract
Although some basic concepts related to medicolegal aspects for the practicing physician have remained unchanged over several years, there is a rapid increase in case-law and new trends emerging in this field. Accordingly, this chapter is divided into three parts. First, a basic overview related to medico-legal civil liability for the practicing physician is discussed, including steps that physicians should consider to minimize this liability. Second, some of the unique legal issues in the practice of pediatric critical care are discussed. Third, several PICUs are in the midst of implementing electronic health records (EHR). The implementation of electronic health records and availability of electronic patient data creates unique challenges and legal issues previously unknown, and key concepts related to these new emerging areas are also discussed.
The information contained in this article is for educational purposes and is not intended to provide legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your situation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Sachdeva RC, D’Andrea LA. Emerging medicolegal issues in the practice of pediatric sleep medicine. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2009;18:1017–25.
Hall v. Hilbun, 466 So.2d 856 (Sup. Ct. Miss., 1985).
Frye v. United States. 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir 1923).
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579. 1993.
Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137. 1999.
The False Claims Act (FCA). 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729–3733.
United States ex rel. Aranda v. Cmty. Psychiatric Ctrs. of Oklahoma, 945 F. Supp. 1485 (W.D. Okla. 1996).
Johnson v. Kokemoor, 199 Wis. 2d 615,545 N.W.2d 495. 1996.
Sachdeva RC. Electronic healthcare data collection and pay-for-performance: translating theory into practice. Ann Health Law. 2007;16:291–311.
Pollack MM, Ruttimann UE, Getson PR. The pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) score. Crit Care Med. 1988;16:1110–6.
Slater A, Shann F, ANZICS Paediatric Study Group. The suitability of the Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM), PIM2, the Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM), and PRISM III for monitoring the quality of pediatric intensive care in Australia and New Zealand. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004;5:447–54.
Sachdeva RC, Blinka DD. Improving the odds of success: quantitative methodology in law practice. Wis Lawyer. 2005;78:12.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Caroline Hackstein and Lisa Ciesielczyk for their assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sachdeva, R.C. (2014). Pediatric Critical Care and the Law: Medical Malpractice. In: Wheeler, D., Wong, H., Shanley, T. (eds) Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6362-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6362-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6361-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6362-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)