Skip to main content

Index Sets in Recursive Combinatorics

  • Chapter
Logical Methods

Part of the book series: Progress in Computer Science and Applied Logic ((PCS,volume 12))

Abstract

Many theorems in infinite combinatorics have noneffective proofs. Nerode’s recursive mathematics program [10] involves looking at noneffective proofs and seeing if they can be made effective. The framework is recursion-theoretic. Typically, if a theorem has a noneffective proof, one would find a ‘recursive version’ of it and see if it is true. Usually the recursive version is false, hence the original proof is necessarily noneffective.

Supported in part by NSF grants CCR-8803641 and CCR-9020079.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beigel, R. and W.I. Gasarch [1989], On the complexity of finding the chromatic number of a recursive graph I: The bounded case. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 45(1), 1–38.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Even, S., A. Selman and Y. Yacobi [1984], The complexity of promise problems with applications to public-key cryptography. Information and Control, 61(2), 159–173.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Hall, M. [1948], Distinct representatives of subsets. Bull. of the American Math. Soc. 54, 922–926.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Harel, D. [1991], Hamiltonian paths in infinite graphs. Israel J. Mathematics 76, 317–336. (Shorter version appeared in STOC 1991.)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Jockusch, Jr. C.G. [1972], Ramsey’s theorem and recursion theory. J. Symbolic Logic 37, 268–280.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Kierstead, H.A. [1981], An effective version of Dilworth’s theorem. Trans. of the AMS 268, 63–77.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kierstead, H.A. [1986], Recursive ordered sets. In Combinatorics and Ordered Sets, vol. 57 of Contemporary Mathematics. American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  8. König, D. [1926], Sur les correspondances multivoques des ensembles, Fundamenta Mathematicae 26, 114–130.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Manaster, A. and J. Rosenstein [1972], Effective matchmaking. Proc. of the London Math. Soc. 25, 615–654.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Metakides, G. and A. Nerode [1979], Effective content of field theory. Annals of Mathematical Logic 17, 289–320.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Soare, R.I. [1987], Recursively Enumerable Sets and Degrees. Perspectives in Mathematical Logic. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Specker, E. [1971], Ramsey’s Theorem does not hold in recursive set theory. In Logic Colloquium; 1969 Manchester, 439–442.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gasarch, W., Martin, G. (1993). Index Sets in Recursive Combinatorics. In: Crossley, J.N., Remmel, J.B., Shore, R.A., Sweedler, M.E. (eds) Logical Methods. Progress in Computer Science and Applied Logic, vol 12. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0325-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0325-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6708-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-0325-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics