Abstract
In this paper, a new model is proposed for spatial dependence that includes separate parameters for overdispersion and the strength of spatial dependence. The new dependence structure is incorporated into a generalized linear mixed model useful for the estimation of disease incidence rates in small geographic regions. The mixed model allows for log-linear covariate adjustment and local smoothing of rates through estimation of the spatially correlated random effects. Computer simulation studies compare the new model with the following sub-models: intrinsic autoregression, an independence model, and a model with no random effects. The major finding was that regression coefficient estimates based on fitting intrinsic autoregression to independent data can have very low precision compared with estimates based on the full model. Additional simulation studies demonstrate that penalized quasi-likelihood (PQL) estimation generally performs very well although the estimates are slightly biased for very small counts.
This research was supported in part by United States Public Health Service Grants CA40644 and CA09168.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Besag, J., Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 36, (1974), pp. 192–236.
Besag, J., York, J. and Mollié, A., Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 43, (1991), pp. 1–20.
Breslow, N.E. and Clayton, D.G., Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88 (1993), pp. 9–25.
Clayton, D. and Kaldor, J., Empirical Bayes estimates of age-standardized relative risks for use in desease mapping, Biometrics, 43, (1987), pp. 671–681.
Cressie, N., Statistics for spatial data, Wiley, New York, 1991, pp. 900.
Kemp, I., Boyle, P., Smans, M. and Muir, C. Atlas of Cancer in Scotland, 1975–1980. Incidence and Epidemiologic Perspective. IARC Scientific Publication No. 72, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, 1985.
Singh, B.B. and Shukla, G.K., A test of autoregression in Gaussian spatial processes, Biometrika, 70, (1983), pp. 523–527.
Yasui, Y. and Lele, S., A regression method for spatial disease rates: an estimating function approach, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92, (1997), pp. 21–32.
Zeger, S.L., Liang, K.-Y., and Albert, P.S., Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach, Biometrics, 44, (1988), pp. 1049–1060.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this paper
Cite this paper
Leroux, B.G., Lei, X., Breslow, N. (2000). Estimation of Disease Rates in Small Areas: A new Mixed Model for Spatial Dependence. In: Halloran, M.E., Berry, D. (eds) Statistical Models in Epidemiology, the Environment, and Clinical Trials. The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications, vol 116. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1284-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1284-3_4
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7078-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1284-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive