Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Modeling Dynamic Systems ((MDS))

Abstract

Of all the species on earth, Homo sapiens is the only one, so far as we know, that uses models (Deacon, 1997). We invent models for many, often conflicting purposes: to provide parsimonious descriptions of observed phenomena, to predict what will happen under prescribed circumstances, and sometimes to explain why things happen the way they do. Models are the indispensable tools of modern science, and increasingly they run on computers, which enables us to predict, and to varying degrees control, the exact landing spot of a Mars probe, the three-dimensional configuration of a molecule, and the chance of rain tomorrow. Such uses of models, in fact, have given rise to a new kind of research, aptly described by the phrase computational science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Carey, S. 1986. Cognitive science and science education, American Psychologist, 41(10), 1123–1130.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, T. W. 1997. The symbolic species: Co-evolution of language and the brain. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A. 1905. Elektrodyamik bewegten Körper, Annalen der Physik, 4(17), 891–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, P. 1996. Linking models to data: Hypermodels for science education. The High School Journal, 79(2), 148–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, P., & Christie, M. T. 1998. Computer-based manipulatives for teaching scientific reasoning: an example. In Jacobson, M. & Kosma R. (eds.), Learning the sciences of the 21st century: Research, design, and implementing advanced technology learning environments. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, P., & Feurzeig, W. 1994. Computer-aided inquiry in mathematics education, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 13(3), 265–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, P., & Barowy, W. 1994. Designing and using open-ended software to promote conceptual change, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3 (3), 161–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1989. Toward a new philosophy of biology: Observations of an evolutionist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendel, G. 1866. Versuche über Pflanzen-Hybriden. Verhandlungen des natur-forschenden Vereines, Abhandlungen, Brünn, 4, 3–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B. Y. 1993. “ThinkerTools: Causal models, conceptual change, and science education.” Cognition and Instruction, 10, 1–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Horwitz, P. (1999). Designing Computer Models That Teach. In: Feurzeig, W., Roberts, N. (eds) Modeling and Simulation in Science and Mathematics Education. Modeling Dynamic Systems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1414-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1414-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7135-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1414-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics