Skip to main content
  • 341 Accesses

Abstract

“An arch is nothing but a strength caused by two weaknesses; that is why an arch in buildings is composed of two quarter-circles; these quarter-circles, each very weak in itself, wish to fall, and opposing each other’s ruin, convert weakness into a single strength.”1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Marcolongo, Studi vinciani,Vol. 7 (Naples, 1937) (hereafter Marcolongo, Studi vinciani),p. 237.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leonardo’s intuition has ancient roots. See for example Seneca’s “Epistola 95, quoted in G.W. Krafft, “Resolutiones problematum spectantium ad architecturam civilem,” Commentarii Novae Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae,Vol. 4 (1752–1753), pp. 200–234. According to Seneca, “Society is similar to the stones of an arch; they would fall, if they did not hinder each other, and thus they hold themselves up.”

    Google Scholar 

  3. Leonardo da Vinci, Forster Codex II, fol. 82v.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marcolongo, Studi vinciani,p. 239.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L.B. Alberti, De re aedificatoria (L’architettura). Ed. G. Orlandi (Milan, 1966), Book 3, ch. 13, pp. 235–237.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Guarini, Architettura civile (Turin, 1787); F. Blondel, “Résolution des quatre principaux problmes d’architecture,” Mémoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciences depuis 1666 jusqu’à 1699, Vol. 5 (1729), pp. 355–530; B. Vit-tone, Istruzioni elementari per l’indirizzo dei giovani allo studio dell’ architettura (Lugano, 1760), pp. 509–514.

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. Viviani, Formazione e misura di tutti i cieli (Florence, 1692), in G. Grandi, Geometrica demonstratio viveanorum problematum (Florence, 1703 ) pp. 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid.,p. 143.

    Google Scholar 

  9. V Scamozzi, Dell’ idea dell’ architettura universale (Venice, 1615), part 2, book 8, ch. 14, p. 320.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Galilei, Opere,Vol. 8, pp. 604–605.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid.,pp. 143–144.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Di. Pasquale, “Una ipotesi sulla struttura della cupola di S. Maria del Fiore,” Restauro, Vol. 28 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. Derand, L’architecture des voûtes, ou l’art des traits, et coupes des voûtes, new ed. (Paris, 1743 ).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid.,part 1, ch. 6, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Rondelet, Traité théorique et pratique de l’art de bâtir (Paris, 1802 ).

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. Viollet le Duc, Dictionnaire raisonné de l’architecture française du XI° au XVI° siècle (Paris, 1854–1868). In his degree dissertation, an Iranian student of mine, Mr. A. Naderi, has shown that the medieval Arabian builders used a slight variant of Derand’s rule. They determined points B and C by intersecting the intrados with a circle centered in D and tangent to the axis of the arch.

    Google Scholar 

  17. C, Wolff, Elementa matheseos universae (Magdeburg, 1717), Vol. 2, Elementa architecturae civilis,ch. 5, problem 18, p. 994; B.A. Vittone, op. cit.; B. Forest de Belidor, La science des ingénieurs dans la conduite des travaux de fortification et d’architecture civile (Paris, 1729), ch. 8; G.B. Borra, Trattato della cognizione pratica delle resistenze geometricamente dimostrato .. (Turin, 1748), pp. 109–122; F. Milizia, Principj di architectura civile 2d ed. (Bassano, 1804)

    Google Scholar 

  18. All quotations from Fabri are taken from Fabri, Physica, Tractatus 2, book 5, pp. 622–627.

    Google Scholar 

  19. This odd “explanation” of the thrust induced by an arch on its abutments can be found also in one of Leonardo’s sketches.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Benvenuto, E. (1991). Knowledge and Prejudice before the Eighteenth Century. In: An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2994-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2994-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7751-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2994-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics