Skip to main content

A Model for Advocacy: From Proposals to Policy

  • Commentary
  • Chapter
Reproductive Laws for the 1990s

Part of the book series: Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society ((CIBES))

  • 147 Accesses

Abstract

My comments on the papers “Reproductive Hazards in the Workplace” by Joan Bertin and “Interference with Reproductive Choice” by Nancy Gertner are based on some of my experiences in the movement for an improved consent process concerning sterilization procedures.1 The movement arose from a growing outrage around the country following the disclosures of the Relf case in 1973.2 A notorious case, it involved two sisters, Mary Alice, then 14, and Minnie Lee Relf, who was 12 at the time of their sterilizations in Montgomery, Alabama in June 1973. As the girls’ mother described in court, two representatives of the federally financed Montgomery Community Action Agency called on her requesting consent to give the children some birth control shots. Believing that the agency had her daughters’ best interest and health in mind, she consented by putting an X on paper.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. See generally H. Rodriguez-Trias, “Women and the Health Care System—Sterilization Abuse, Two Lectures,” The Women’s Center, Barnard College, New York, 1978;

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Rodriguez-Trias, “The Women’s Health Movement,” a chapter in Reforming Medicine, V. Seidel and R. Seidel, Eds., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Relf vs. Weinberger, 372 Federal Supplement 1196, 1199 (D.D.C. 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jack Slater, “Sterilization: Newest Threat to the Poor,” Ebony, October 1973, p. 150.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Relf vs. Weinberger, 372 Federal Supplement 1196, 1199 (D.D.C. 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Slater, p. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Joan Kelly, “Sterilization and Civil Rights,” Rights (publication of the National Emergency Civil Liberties Committee), September/October 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Claudia Dreifus, “Sterilizing the Poor,” The Progressive, December 1975, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robert E. McGarraugh, Jr., “Sterilization Without Consent: Teaching Hospital Violations of HEW Regulations: A Report by Public Citizens’ Health Research Group,” January 1975 (prepared for the Public Citizens’ Health Research Group, Washington, D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elissa Krauss, “Hospital Survey on Sterilization Policies: Reproductive Freedom Project,” ACLU Reports, March 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carl W. Tyler, Jr., “An Assessment of Policy Compliance with the Federal Control of Sterilization,” June 1975 (available from the Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Ga.).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guidelines on Sterilization for the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  13. New York City Council Public Law #37.

    Google Scholar 

  14. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Guidelines on Sterilization. Federal Register, Volume 43, Number 217.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Rutgers, The State University

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rodriguez-Trias, H. (1989). A Model for Advocacy: From Proposals to Policy. In: Cohen, S., Taub, N. (eds) Reproductive Laws for the 1990s. Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3710-5_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3710-5_17

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-175-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3710-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics