Skip to main content

The Defense of a Malpractice Case

  • Chapter
Legal Aspects of Medicine

Abstract

Hippocrates once admonished his physicians to “first, do no harm.” But today a doctor who merely fulfills that prologue to the “Healers Oath” will not be immune to a malpractice suit. Nor will the plea that he did not depart from accepted medical standards of care guarantee a defendant’s verdict. In an age where there are instant-paid professional experts eager to take the stand, much more is required than merely proof of good medicine. Although there are many meritorious cases that should be compensated, today’s doctors must fight an uphill battle against the natural sympathy engendered by the injured plaintiff (patient).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Charles S, Kennedy, E: Defendant: A Psychiatrist on Trial for Medical Malpractice NY, The Free Press, 1985, p 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Charles S, Wilbart J., Kennedy E: Physician, Self-reports of Reactions to Malpractice Litigation J Am Psych 1984;141(4): 563–565.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coburn, R.J: The Physician and the Malpractice Suit, Medical Malpractices Strategies and Principles. NYS Bar Assoc., 1986, p 44.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robertson, J: Psychiatric Malpractice, NY, John Wiley & Sons, 1988, p 47.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Worried about Malpractice, Physician is an Apparent Suicide. New York Times Nov. 2, 1986; 11:88.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Peppercorn v. Murphy, 114 Cal. App. 101, 229P. 762 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  7. For example: Breach of contract: Ancolte Manor Found v. Wilkinson, 263 So.2d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972) (breach of confidentiality); intentional tort: e.g., Gonzalez v. State, 121 Misc.2d 210, 467 N.Y.S.2d 538 (Ct. CI. 1983) (false imprisonment claim).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 70 CJS Physicians & Surgeons §41 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  9. See, Psychiatrist Malpractice, supra, note 5, at p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See also, AC Corcoran, A Mirror Up to Medicine, NY, J.D. Lippincott, which credits the “Technique of the House Call” to Archimacheus of Salerno in the 12th century.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dicker, H., Robertson, J.D. (1989). The Defense of a Malpractice Case. In: Vevaina, J.R., Bone, R.C., Kassoff, E. (eds) Legal Aspects of Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4534-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4534-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8867-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4534-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics