Abstract
The nine preceding chapters consider a variety of group phenomena and theories about why they occur. The approach to understanding group behavior adopted in these chapters seems to be a rich and productive one in two respects. First, for the most part, the theories represented here consider the relevance to group behavior of concepts that have been applied to individuals. Second, they have been developed to explain a broad range of behaviors, not just particular, isolated individual or group phenomena (see Mullen, Chapter 1, this volume). Because of their applicability to both individuals and groups and their applicability to a broad range of behaviors, each of these theories, individually, has the potential to provide an integrative analysis of not only behavior in groups, but also of social behaivor more broadly. If some integrative analysis and understanding is provided by each of the theories individually, what can we say about the degree of understanding to be derived from the theories collectively, that is, from the volume as a whole? We shall approach this question by addressing two issues in this commentary. First, how do the various theories relate to one another? How do they differ, how do they compete, and how do they cooperatively add to our knowledge? Second, once the theories are placed in comparative perspective, what do we know about group behavior, and what do we still need to know?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, V.L., & Wilder, D.A. (1977). Social comparison, self-evaluation, and conformity to the group. In J.M. Suls & R.L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 187–208). Washington, DC: Halsted Press.
Aronson, E. (1969). The theory of cognitive dissonance: a current perspective. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4 pp. 2–34). New York: Academic Press.
Bern, D. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6 pp. 1–62). New York: Academic Press.
Bond, C.F. (1982). Social facilitation: A self-presentational view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1042–1050.
Brickman, P., & Bulman, R.J. (1977). Pleasure and pain in social comparison. In J.M. Suls & R.L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 149–186). Washington, DC: Halsted Press.
Erikson, E. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271–282.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Festinger, L., Riecken, H.W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Froming, W.J., & Carver, C.S. (1981). Divergent influences of private and public self-consciousness in a compliance paradigm. Journal of Research in Personality, 15, 159–171.
Gastorf, J.W., Suls, J.M., & Sanders, G.S. (1980). Type A coronary-prone behavior pattern and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 773–780.
Gergen, K.J. (1971). The self-concept. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Goethals, G.R., Allison, S.J., & Frost, M. (1979). Perceptions of the magnitude and diversity of social support. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 570–581.
Goethals, G.R., & Darley, J.M. (1977). Social comparison theory: an attributional approach. In J.M. Suls & R.L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison theory: theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 259–278). Washington, DC: Halsted Press.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.
Guerin, B. , & Innes, J.M. (1982). Social facilitation and social monitoring: a new look at Zajonc’s mere exposure hypothesis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 7–18.
Henchy, T., & Glass, D.C. (1968). Evaluation apprehension and social facilitation of dominant and subordinate responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 446–454.
Hormuth, S.E. (1982). Self-awareness and drive theory: comparing internal standards and dominant responses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 31–45.
Jackson, J.M. (1986). In defense of social impact theory: A comment on Mullen. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 511–513.
Jackson, J. M., & Williams, K. D. (1985). Social loafing on difficult tasks: Working collectively can improve performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 937–942.
Janis, I.L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making. New York: Free Press.
Jones, E.E., & Gerard, H.B. (1967). Foundations of social psychology. New York: Wiley.
Mettee, D.R., & Smith, G. (1977). Social comparison and interpersonal attraction: the case for dissimilarity. In J.M. Suls & R.L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 69–102). Washington, DC: Halsted Press.
Miller, N.E., & Dollard, J. (1941). Social learning and imitation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Moscovici, S. (1985). Social influence and conformity. In G.L. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Random House.
Mullen, B. (1985). Strength and immediacy of sources: A meta-analytic evaluation of the forgotten elements of social impact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1458–1466.
Mullen, B. (1986). The effects of strength and immediacy in group contexts: A reply to Jackson. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 514–516.
Quattrone, G. (1986). On the perception of a group’s variability. In S. Worchel & W.G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Schachter, S. (1959). The psychology of affiliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Scheier, M.F., & Carver, C.S. (1983). Self-directed attention and the comparison of self with standards. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 205–222.
Schlenker, B.R. (1980). Impression management: The self concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Stevens, S.S. (1957). On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64, 153–181.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W.G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Tedeschi, J.T., Schlenker, B.R., & Bonoma, T.V. (1971). Cognitive dissonance: private ratiocination or public spectacle? American psychologist, 26, 685–695.
Wegner, D.W., & Giuliano, T. (1980) Arousal-induced attention to self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 719–726.
Wicklund, R.W., & Brehm, J.W. (1976) Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zajonc, R.B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274.
Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Compresence. In P. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 35–60). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zanna, M.P., & Cooper, J. (1976). Dissonance and the attribution process. In J.H. Harvey, W.J. Ickes, & R.F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1 pp. 199–217). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goethals, G.R. (1987). Theories of Group Behavior: Commentary. In: Mullen, B., Goethals, G.R. (eds) Theories of Group Behavior. Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3_10
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9092-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4634-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive