Abstract
Imagery mnemonics have been advocated as effective memory devices for at least 2000 years (Yates, 1966). It is only within the past 20 years, however, that controlled laboratory studies have clearly established the memorial benefits of imagery mnemonics. More recently, the practical applications of imagery mnemonics have been explored and these techniques have been shown to be useful for learning prose materials as well as lists (cf. Bellezza, 1981; see Denis, Chapter 9, this volume, for more information on imagery and prose retention), to be effective in educational settings (cf. Bellezza, 1981; Pressley, Levin, & Delaney, 1982) and to enhance memory in special populations (Mastropieri, Scruggs, & Levin, Chapter 16, this volume; Pressley, Johnson, & Symons, in press). These populations include children as young as 3 years old (cf. Pressley et al., 1982), some types of amnesic patients (Baddeley & Warrington, 1973; Jones, 1974; see also Richardson, Cermak, Blackford, & O’Connor, Chapter 14, this volume for a review of this literature), the elderly (Robertson-Tchabo, Hausman, & Arenberg, 1976), and the mentally retarded (see Bender & Levin, 1978). Given the great potential of mnemonic techniques for improving memory in a wide variety of situations, it is important to identify those components of mnemonic techniques that actually have positive effects on memory. Research on these components may also yield useful information on theoretical conceptualizations within the general memory literature. For example, research on bizarre imagery may enhance our understanding of recent theoretical analyses based on distinctiveness (Eysenck, 1979; Hunt & Elliott, 1980; Nelson, 1979).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andreoff, G. R., & Yarmey, A. D. (1976). Bizarre imagery and associative learning: A confirmation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43, 143–148.
Baddeley, A. D., & Warrington, E. K. (1973). Memory coding and amnesia. Neuropsy-chologia, 11, 159–165.
Bellezza, E S. (1981). Mnemonic devices: Classification, characteristics, and criteria. Review of Educational Research, 51, 247–275.
Bender, B. G., & Levin, J. R. (1978). Pictures, imagery, and retarded childrens’s prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 583–588.
Bergfeld, V. A., Choate, L. S., & Kroll, N. E. (1982). The effect of bizarre imagery on memory as a function of delay: Reconfirmation of interaction effect. Journal of Mental Imagery, 6, 141–158.
Bobrow, S. A., & Bower, G. H. (1969). Comprehension and recall of sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 455–461.
Bower, G. H. (1970a). Imagery as a relational organizer in associative learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 529–533.
Bower, G. H. (1970b). Analysis of a mnemonic device. American Scientist, 58, 496–510.
Bower, G. H., & Winzenz, D. (1970). Comparison of associative learning strategies. Psychonomic Science, 20, 119–120.
Bruce, D., & Gaines, M. T. (1976). Tests of an organizational hypothesis of isolation effects in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 59–72.
Collyer, S. C., Jonides, J., & Bevan, W. (1972). Images as memory aids: Is bizarrenesshelpful? American Journal of Psychology, 85, 31–38.
Cox, S. D., & Wollen, K. A. (1981). Bizarreness and recall. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 244–245.
Einstein, G. O., & Hunt, R. R. (1980). Levels of processing and organization: Additive effects of individual-item and relational processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 588–598.
Emmerich, H., & Ackerman, B. (1979). A test of bizarre interaction as a factor in children’s memory. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 134, 225–232.
Eysenck, M. W. (1979). Depth, elaboration and distinctiveness. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 89–118). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Hauck, P., Walsh, C., & Kroll, N. (1976). Visual imagery mnemonics: Common versus bizarre mental images. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 160–162.
Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 497–514.
Hunt, R. R., & Elliott, J. M. (1980). The role of nonsemantic information in memory: Orthographic distinctiveness effects upon retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 49–74.
Jacoby, L. L., & Craik, F. I. M. (1979). Effects of elaboration of processing at encoding and retrieval: Trace distinctiveness and recovery of initial context. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Jones, M. K. (1974). Imagery as a mnemonic aid after left temporal lobectomy: Contrast between material-specific and generalized memory disorders. Neuropsychologia, 12, 21–30.
Klein, K., & Saltz, E. (1976). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 671–679.
Kroll, N. E., Schepler, E. M., & Angin, K. T. (1986). Bizarre imagery: The misremembered mnemonic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 42–54.
Lockhart, R. S., Craik, F. I. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1976). Depth of processing, recognition and recall. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recognition and recall. London: Wiley.
Lorayne, H., & Lucas, J. (1974). The memory book. New York: Stein & Day.
Marshall, P. H., Nau, K., & Chandler, C. K. (1980). A functional analysis of common and bizarre visual mediators. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 373–377.
McDaniel, M. A., & Anderson, D. C. (1986). Modulation of environmental reinstatement effects through imaginal and non-imaginal encoding. Unpublished manuscript, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (1985). Toward an understanding of the bizarre imagery mnemonic: Effects of design type, intervening learning, and type of test. Unpublished manuscript, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (1986). Bizarre imagery as an effective memory aid: The importance of distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 54–65.
Merry, R. (1980). Image bizarreness in incidental learning. Psychological Reports, 46, 427–430.
Merry, R. (1982). Cues, bizarreness and the recall of images. Unpublished manuscript, University of Leicester, Leicester, England.
Merry, R., & Graham, N. C. (1978). Imagery bizarreness in children’s recall of sentences. British Journal of Psychology, 69, 315–321.
Nappe, G. W., & Wollen, K. A. (1973). Effects of instruction to form common and bizarre mental images on retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100, 6–8.
Nelson, D. L. (1979). Remembering pictures and words: Appearance, significance, and name. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 45–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Nickerson, R. S. (1984). Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing: A persistent enigma in memory research. Memory and Cognition, 72,531–552.
O’Brien, E. J., & Wolford, C. R. (1982). Effect of delay in testing on retention of plausible versus bizarre mental images. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 148–152.
Postman, L. (1975). Verbal learning and memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 26, 291–335.
Pra Baldi, A., de Beni, R., Cornoldi, C., & Cavedon, A. (1985). Some conditions for the occurrence of the bizarreness effect in free recall. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 427–436.
Pressley, M., Johnson, C. J., & Symons, S. (in press). Elaborating to learn and learning to elaborate. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
Pressley, M., Levin, J. R., & Delaney, H. D. (1982). The mnemonic keyword method. Review of Educational Research, 52, 61–91.
Robertson-Tchabo, E. A., Hausman, C. P., & Arenberg, D. (1976). A classical mnemonic for older learners: A trip that works. Educational Gerontology, 1, 215–226.
Roediger, H. L., III, & Neely, J. H. (1982). Retrieval blocks in episodic and semantic memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 213–242.
Schmidt, S. R. (1985). Encoding and retrieval processes in the memory for conceptually distinctive events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 565–578.
Senter, R. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (1976). Bizarreness as a nonessential variable in mnemonic imagery: A confirmation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 163–164.
Stein, B. S. (1978). Depth of processing reexamined: The effects of the precision of encoding and test appropriateness. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 165–174.
Watkins, O. C., & Watkins, M. J. (1975). Buildup of proactive inhibition as a cue-overload effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 104, 442–452.
Webber, S. M., & Marshall, P. H. (1978). Bizarreness effects in imagery as a function of processing level and delay. Journal of Mental Imagery, 2, 291–300.
Wollen, K. A., & Cox, S. (1981a). Sentence cuing and the effectiveness of bizarre imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 7, 386–392.
Wollen, K. A., & Cox, S. (1981b). The bizarreness effect in a multitrial intentional learning task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 296–298.
Wollen, K. A., Weber, A., & Lowry, D. H. (1972). Bizarreness versus interaction of mental images as determinants of learning. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 518–523.
Wood, G. (1967). Mnemonic systems in recall. Journal of Educational Psychology Monographs, 58 (6, Whole No. 645).
Yarmey, A. D. (1984). Bizarreness effects in mental imagery. In A. A. Sheikh (Ed.), International review of mental imagery (Vol. 1, pp. 57–76). New York: Human Sciences Press.
Yates, F. A. (1966). The art of memory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Einstein, G.O., McDaniel, M.A. (1987). Distinctiveness and the Mnemonic Benefits of Bizarre Imagery. In: McDaniel, M.A., Pressley, M. (eds) Imagery and Related Mnemonic Processes. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4676-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4676-3_4
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9111-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4676-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive