Skip to main content

Solving Sequential Conditions by Finite-State Strategies

  • Chapter
The Collected Works of J. Richard Büchi

Abstract

Our main purpose is to present an algorithm which decides whether or not a condition 𝕮(X, Y) stated in sequential calculus admits a finite automata solution, and produces one if it exists. This solves a problem stated in [4] and contains, as a very special case, the answer to Case 4 left open in [6]. In an equally appealing form the result can be restated in the terminology of [7], [10], [15]: Every ω-game definable in sequential calculus is determined. Moreover the player who has a winning strategy, in fact, has a winning finite-state strategy, that is one which can effectively be played in a strong sense. The main proof, that of the central Theorem 1, will be presented at the end. We begin with a discussion of its consequences.

This research was sponsored by the National Science Foundation Grant No. GJ-120. The main result was announced in [13].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. J. R. Buchi, Decision methods in the theory of ordinals, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 71 (1965), 767–770.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. J. R. Buchi, C. E. Elgot and J. B. Wright, The nonexistence of certain algorithms of finite automata theory, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 5 (1958), 98.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. R. Buchi, Weak second-order arithmetic and finite automata, Z. Math. Logik Grundlagen Math. 6 (1960), 66–92.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. J. R. Buchi, On a decision method in restricted second order arithmetic, Proc. Internat. Congr. Logic, Method, and Philos. Sci. 1960, Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, Calif., 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Church, Application of recursive arithmetic to the problem of circuit synthesis, Summaries of Talks Presented at the Summer Institute for Symbolic Logic, Cornell Univ. 1957, 2nd ed; Princeton, N. J., 1960, 3–50.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Church, Logic arithmetic and automata, Proc. Internat. Congr. Math. 1963, Almqvist and Wiksells, Uppsala, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Davis, “Infinite games of perfect information” in Advances in game theory, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N. J., 1964, 85–101.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. C. Elgot, Decision problems of finite automata design and related arithmetics, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 98 (1961), 21–51.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Friedman, Some results in Church’s restricted recursive arithmetic, J. Symbolic Logic 22 (1957), 337–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Gale and F. M. Stewart, “Infinite games with perfect information” in Contributions to the theory of games, Vol. II, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N. J., 1953, 245–266.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. C. Kleene, Arithmetical predicates and function quantifiers, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 79 (1955), 312–340.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. S. C. Kleene, “Representation of events in nerve nets and finite automata” in Automata studies, Princeton Univ. Press. Princeton, N. J., 1956, 3–41.

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. H. Landweber, Finite state gamesA solvability algorithm for restricted second-order arithmetic, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 14 (1967), 129–130.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. McNaughton, Testing and generating infinite sequences by a finite automaton, Information and Control 9 (1966), 521–530.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Mycielski, S. Swierczkowski and A. Zieba, On infinite positional games, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Cl. III 4 (1956), 485–488.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Rabin and D. Scott, Finite automata and their decision problems, IBM J. Res. Develop. 3(1959), 114–125.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Rabin, “Effective computability of winning strategies” in Contributions to the theory of games, Vol. III, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N. J., 1957, 147–157.

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. A. Trachtenbrot, Synthesis of logic networks whose operators are described by means of single place predicate calculus, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 118 (1958), 646–649.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. B. A. Trachtenbrot, Finite automata and the logic of single place predicates, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 140 (1961), 320–323 = Soviet Math. Dokl. 2 (1961), 623–626.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. R. Buchi and L. G. Landweber, Definability in the monadic second-order theory of successor, J. Symbolic Logic 34 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Buchi, J.R., Landweber, L.H. (1990). Solving Sequential Conditions by Finite-State Strategies. In: Mac Lane, S., Siefkes, D. (eds) The Collected Works of J. Richard Büchi. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8928-6_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8928-6_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8930-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8928-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics