Skip to main content

Abstract

The search for answers to questions about crime and attempts to control it eventually leads most researchers to data about its nature and distribution. Investigators who study crime or social problems have long sought out data necessary to frame or revise research questions, test hypotheses, or interpret findings.1 Today, data sources are used to unravel the reasons for crime or deviance, determine the impact of crime prevention or rehabilitation programs, assess changes in crime or crime rates, model the careers of offenders, estimate the risk of victimization, determine defendant dispositions after arrest, and address numerous other questions.

… no people, ever, have been more diligent in counting themselves, their opinions, conditions, and behaviors. The largest behavioral science studies in terms of numbers of subjects, numbers of tests, and money expended have been American, and no other land tries to tally such a grand range of activities—from tax filings to bedroom pleasures. (G. Nettler, 1989, p. 36)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bachman, G.G., Green, S., & Wirtanen, I.D. (1970). Youth in transition: Vol. II. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, G.G., Green, S., & Wirtanen, I.D. (1971). Youth in transition: Vol. III. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, G.G., O’Malley, P.M., & Johnston, J. (1978). Youth in transition: Vol. IV. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, G.G. (1987). Monitoring the Future. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biderman, A.D., & Reiss, A., Jr. (1967). On exploring the “dark figure” of crime. The Annals, 374, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, D., & Reiss, A., Jr. (1970). Police control of juveniles. American Sociological Review, 35, 63–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A., Cohen, J. Roth, J.A., & Vishor, C.A. (Eds.). (1988). Criminal careers and “career criminals.” Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, B., Conly, C.H., Warner, L., Sones, R., & Martin, W. (1989). The pro-secution of felony arrests, 1986. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A., Johnson, D.R., and Choldin H. (1977). Correlates of city crime rates: Victimization surveys versus official statistics. Sociological Quarterly, 21, 391–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1988). Criminal victimization 1987. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1989). The redesigned National Crime Survey: Selected new data. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, D., & Cohen, L.E. (1984). Comparing measures of homicide trends: Methodological and substantive differences in the Vital Statistics and Uniform Crime Report Time Series (1933–1975). Social Science Research, 9, 121–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, S.H. (1977). Official crime rates and victim surveys: An empirical com-parison. Criminal Justice, 5, 47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, R.W., & Lentzner, H.R. ( 1978, August 14–17). Patterns of Personal Series Incidents in the National Crime Survey. Paper presentd at the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D.S., & Ageton, S.S. (1978). Reconciling differences in estimates of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 43, 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1988a). Uniform Crime Reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1988b). Uniform crime reporting: National Incident-Based Reporting System. Volume I: Data collection guidelines. Washing-ton DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1989). Uniform Crime Reports. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeney, F.F., Dill, F., & Weir, A. (1982). Arrests without conviction: How often they occur and why. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forst, B., Lucianovic, J., & Cox, S.J. (1977). What happens after arrest? Washington, DC: Institute for Law and Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, M., & Reimer, D.J. (1974). Changing patterns of delinquent behavior among Americans 13 to 17 years old-1972. Report Number 1 of the National Survey of Youth, 1972. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M., & Gottfredson, D. (1988). Decisionmaking in criminal justice ( 2nd ed. ). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, W.R., Hughes, M., & Geerken, M. (1985). Are Uniform Crime Reports a valid indicator of the Index crimes? An affirmative answer with minor qualifications. Criminology, 23, 451–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M.J. (1974). The Uniform Crime Reports revisited. Journal of Criminal Justice, 2, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M.J., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J.G. (1979). Correlates of delinquency: The illusion of discrepancy between self-report and official measures. American Sociological Review, 44, 995–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, (1969). Causes of Delinquency. University of Calfornia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, D., & Elliott, D.S. (1984). Self-reported measures of delinquency and crime: Methodological issues and comparative findings. Boulder, CO: Behavioral Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, D., & Elliott, D.S. (1987). Juvenile offenders: Prevalence, offender inci-dence and arrest rates by race. Crime and Delinquency, 33, 206–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. (1986). Directory of criminal justice data collections in the United States. Ann Arbor: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P.G. (1988). Assessing the validity of official data on arson. Criminology, 26, 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempf, K.L. (1989). Hirschi’s control theory: Is it fertile but not yet fecund? Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology Meetings, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehnen, R.G., & Skogan, W.G. (Eds.). (1981). The National Crime Survey: Working papers. Volume I: Current and historical perspectives. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundman, R., Sykes, R., & Clark, J. (1978). Police control of juveniles: A replica-tion. Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency, 15, 74–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltz, M.D. (1977). Crime statistics: A historical perspective. Crime and Delinquency, 23, 32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menard, S. (1987). Short-term trends in crime and delinquency: A comparison of UCR, NCS and self-report data. Justice Quarterly, 4, 455–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menard, S. (1988). UCR and NCD: Comparisons over space and time. Journal of Criminal Justice, 16, 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S.F. (1984). The “dark figure” and composite indexes of crime: Some empirical exploration of alternative data sources. Journal of Criminal Justice, 12, 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, K.D. (1974). Arson, vandalism and violence: Law enforcement problems affecting fire departments. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement. (1931). Report on criminal statistics. Report No. 3. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Justice. (1987). Data Resources of the National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettler, G. (1989). Criminology lessons. Cincinatti, Ohio: Anderson Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, R. (1985). Crime and victimization data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, D.W., O’Malley, P.M., Bachman, J.G., & Johnson, L.D. (1989). Time trends and age trends in arrests and self-reported illegal behavior. Criminology, 27, 389–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piliavin, I., & Briar, S. (1964). Police encounters with juveniles. American Journal of Sociology, 70, 206–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T.M. (1986). The rise of statistical thinking 1820–1900. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porterfield, A. (1946). Youth in trouble. Fort Worth, TX: Leo Potishman Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, A.J., Jr. (1971). The police and the public. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, A.J., Jr. (1978). Final report for analytical studies of victimization in crime using National Crime Survey data. New Haven: Yale University, Institute for Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savitz, L.D. (1982). Official statistics. In L.D. Savitz and N. Johnston (Eds.), Contemporary criminology (pp. 4–15 ). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, I. (1988). In-justice for juveniles: Rethinking the best interests of the child. Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellin, T. (1951). The significance of records of crime. The Law Quarterly Review, 67, 489–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W. (1976). Crime and crime rates. pp. 27–41. In W. Skogan (Ed.), Sample surveys of victims of crime. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W. (1981). Issues in the Measurement of Victimization. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (1981). National Crime Surveys: National Sample, 1973–1979. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Senate Subcommittee. (1978). Arson-for-Hire. Proceedings of the 62nd Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vera Institute of Justice. (1977). Felony arrests: Their prosecution and disposition in New York City’s courts (Monograph). New York: Author.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jackson, P.G. (1990). Sources of Data. In: Kempf, K.L. (eds) Measurement Issues in Criminology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9009-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9009-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97260-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-9009-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics