Skip to main content

Discussion and Conclusions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Ethics of Anthropology and Amerindian Research

Abstract

The findings advanced by contributors to this volume collectively agree that the publication of data regarding native environmental mismanagement, warfare, and violence are essential to the accurate production of knowledge in the disciplines of anthropology and the social sciences more generally. We believe that the judicious reporting of indigenous conflict and environmental degradation may well prove beneficial to Amerindians. Most significantly, we collectively agree that the censorship or suppression of such findings may prove deleterious to native communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Vickers (1994:331) points out that conservation “is not a state of being. It is a response to people’s perceptions about the state of their environment and its resources, and a willingness to modify their behaviors to adjust to new realities.”

  2. 2.

    Rather than assuming that indigenous peoples operate as innate conservationists, the editors call for the documentation of the particular environmental, political, and socioeconomic conditions that may foster sustainable harvests among Amerindians.

  3. 3.

    Richard Chacon, unpublished field notes, June 2000.

  4. 4.

    Ventocilla et al. (1996) also report that the Kuna harvest lobster indiscriminately.

  5. 5.

    Conklin and Graham state that “[t]he assumption that Indians will always opt for long-term environmental conservation rather than short-term profits is untenable” (1995:703).

  6. 6.

    The hunt, which was sanctioned by the International Whaling Commission, permitted the Makah to harvest 20 whales over a 5-year period (Editor 1999).

  7. 7.

    Soon after the first whale hunt, various environmentalist and animal rights groups pursued litigation against the Makah (Wagner 2009).

  8. 8.

    For documentation of racist attacks targeting the Chippewa for their decision to harvest walleye salmon, see (Buege 1996).

  9. 9.

    On September 7, 2007, a small group of Makah killed another whale and these individuals received death threats as a result of their actions (Wagner 2009).

  10. 10.

    This backlash came as the result of the Yuquí losing their status as “guardians of the natural world” and this development provided non-Indians with justification for the usurping of tribal lands. Conklin and Graham (1995) warned that the promotion of native peoples as innate conservationists could result in just such harmful outcomes.

  11. 11.

    There is great hypocrisy at play whenever land tenure becomes linked to sustainable natural resource use. No Western country (that we are aware of) mandates sustainable harvesting of natural resources as a condition for the continued ownership of lands. However, when native peoples are involved, some Western governments insist that indigenous groups harvest natural resources at sustainable levels as a condition for continued land ownership, as indicated in the Yuquí case.

  12. 12.

    Along these lines, Buege (1996) holds that claims of ecological indigeneity actually serve to oppress Amerindians.

  13. 13.

    Amerindians are shackled by the expectation that that they should be ecologically noble people. According to Buege (1996: 86) “[i]f they do anything that might bring this nobility into question, they risk losing their rights…” This double standard is particularly insidious because Westerners are typically unwilling to discard modern technologies, but they often insist that native peoples forgo the use of modern devices so as to remain ecologically noble (Buege 1996).

  14. 14.

    For additional examples of how Amerindian groups are severely criticized for failing to live up to Western expectations of eco-nobility, see Buege (1996).

  15. 15.

    Along these lines, Buege asks if it is reasonable to assume that “ecologically noble” people would maintain their conservationist traditions given their devastating encounter with the Western world: “Since the industrial revolution, colonialism has left indelible marks upon all indigenous peoples. South and North American Indians, Pacific Islanders, Australian aborigines, Arctic peoples, and African peoples occupied lands, who were at one time relatively distant from European influence, have seen their land bases reduced in size by the encroachment of Western ‘civilization’…Colonialism intrudes upon nearly every facet of native peoples’ lives. Because of these intrusions, the practice of traditional agriculture, maintaining healthy relationships with the land, is now rare. In the face of several 100 years of colonialism, how could we expect people to preserve in pristine fashion their traditional ways of life, especially when Euro-Americans have practically pounded their economics, politics, and morals into these peoples?” (Buege 1996: 81–83).

  16. 16.

    Calvin Martin (1978) also claims that the well-documented overharvesting of fauna by Amerindians during the Fur Trade was attributable to Western influences.

  17. 17.

    It is important to note that contact with the West can, under certain circumstances, actually ­promote conservation, as the following case involving a Labradorian tribe indicates: According to Ellickson (2001:49), “[i]n earlier [pre-contact] times, the tribe’s norms had supported community hunting rights within its forests, a system that creates few incentives for an individual hunter to conserve the stock of game. Once the European traders had come on the scene, the tribe shifted to a system of exclusive hunting territories…This system is more efficient when game is scarce because the sole owner of a territory inhabited by non-migratory wild animals has a much sharper incentive than a communal hunter to avoid overhunting.”

  18. 18.

    For data indicating that native peoples of New Zealand, Australia, and North America played a key role in the demise of megafauna, see Gillespie (2008).

  19. 19.

    For other examples of Amerindian egalitarian subsistence hunters harvesting Neotropical game at non-sustainable levels, see Alvard (1993, 1994, 1995, 1998a, b).

  20. 20.

    Thus, “present-day Amazonian landscapes were shaped by a complex history of past human activities and sudden demographic collapse” (Erickson 2006: 235–236).

  21. 21.

    Those who insist on believing that pre-contact America was a pristine wilderness fail to understand the complex interplay of nature and indigenous culture that shaped and continues to shape ecosystems throughout the Americas (Balée 1989; Erickson 2006). Research indicates that native peoples modified, and continue to modify, plant and animal communities “for human benefit and to increase productivity” (Kay 1998: 492).

  22. 22.

    US President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the 1964 Wilderness Act into Law and this decree included the following statement: “A wilderness, in contrast with those areas where man and his works dominate the landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where the earth and the community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who does not remain” (Wilderness Act, Public Law 88–577, September 3, 1964). For the origins of the concept of wilderness, see Newmann (1998).

  23. 23.

    One of the justifications put forth for the forced relocation of San and Bakgalagadi peoples from Botswana’s Central Kalahari Game Reserve was that the refuge would have greater tourist value if the area was “pristine” (i.e., devoid of people living in the preserve) (Hitchcock et al. (2011).

  24. 24.

    The creation of Yellowstone National Park is the quintessential example of fortress conservation as the US Cavalry forcibly removed Shoshone Indians from the Park in the 1880s (Igoe 2004).

  25. 25.

    An example of this top–down, exclusionary policy that removes human beings from nature can be seen in Terborgh’s call for the “political courage” to establish “a carefully constructed and voluntary relocation program” for “contacted indigenous groups” (Terborgh 1999: 56).

  26. 26.

    Dowie (2009) refers to the victims of such policies as “conservation refugees.”

  27. 27.

    According to Stearman (1994: 348), a Yuquí hunter would never pass up an opportunity to give meat to another Yuquí because “prestige among men is based on hunting success.”

  28. 28.

    However, see Whitley (1998a, b) who stresses the shamanic aspects of Coso Range rock art.

  29. 29.

    For more on the important role that prestige and status seeking play in hunting, consult. (Bliege Bird and Smith 2005; Bliege Bird et al. 2001; Gurven and Hill 2009; Hawkes 1991; Hawkes and Bliege Bird 2002; Raven 1990; Smith 2004).

  30. 30.

    As previously reported, the 1964 Federal Wilderness Act was based on the premise that the most effective way to preserve biodiversity is to create and maintain large expanses of intact (i.e., unoccupied) lands (Dowie 2009).

  31. 31.

    Likewise, Gold states, “In order to create successful wildlife restoration programs, anthropologists need to accurately describe the intersection between native people and the landscape” (Alan Gold, personal communication to Chacon, 2010).

  32. 32.

    Lightfoot and Parrish (2009: 96) refer to the effect of Amerindian fire management as “pyro-diversity.”

  33. 33.

    See also Sirén et al. (2004) for similar recommendations involving the Amazonian Quichua of Sarayacu.

  34. 34.

    The settlement patterns of other indigenous peoples such as the pastoralist Turkana of Kenya are also greatly affected by warfare. According to Lienard, “ideally, the Turkana prefer to reside in small independent herding groups in their lowland homeland. However, as part of their annual transhumance, many Turkana relocate to mountain camps that are dangerously close to the territory of their traditional enemies. At these highland locations, the Turkana coalesce into large settlements of over 1,000 people for defensive reasons. The atmosphere in these mountain camps is very tense and people will only start relaxing when it is time to leave these hazardous mountain areas to travel back to the Turkana lowlands” (Pierre Lienard, personal communication to Chacon, 2010).

  35. 35.

    See Redmond et al. (1999) for how pre-contact Venezuelan chiefdoms constructed 8-m-tall causeways that were likely designed with defensive purposes in mind.

  36. 36.

    Likewise, Ferguson (1990:34) notes that “[b]y forcing relocations, war can result in reapportionment of resource territories to the size (and so military strength) of groups; and to weaker groups being forced to leave an area entirely.”

  37. 37.

    These improvements came about because the Pax Incaica permitted Wanka populations to move down from their agriculturally marginal hilltop locations and safely occupy the fertile bottomlands (Earle 1997; Johnson and Earle 2000).

  38. 38.

    Moreover, Trigger (2003: 629) reports that “[f]or [Aztec] commoners, the only legitimate way to advance was by capturing enemy warriors in battle.”

  39. 39.

    According to Trigger (1993: 67), “[a]ny [Aztec] man who was caught wearing clothes or ornaments above his station was subject to punishments, including the death penalty.”

  40. 40.

    See Yamilette Chacon (2009) for a detailed analysis of Inka social mobility.

  41. 41.

    See Chacon (2007) and Chagnon (1997) for ethnographic examples of how the possession of military prowess enhances the social standing of individuals in egalitarian Amazonian groups.

  42. 42.

    This location is known today as Felipe Carrillo Puerto (Reed 1964).

  43. 43.

    Cited from Chacon’s unpublished field notes.

  44. 44.

    According to Rubenstein (2007), the very act of possessing tsantsas serves to confirm the legitimacy of modern-day Shuar Federation leaders.

  45. 45.

    Violent acts are also common among Fueguian myths. According to Prieto and Cardenas (2007: 220), “[a]bout 30% of the 59 Selk’nam myths and about 27% of the 26 Yámana myths describe episodes of violence.” See also Beckerman and Yost (2007).

  46. 46.

    See Demarest and Woodfill (Chap. 7, this volume) for documentation of the important role that blood sacrifice continues to play among contemporary Mesoamericans.

  47. 47.

    Chacon et al. (2007:123) report that to date, “…the remains of approximately 25 individuals who were most likely sacrificial victims have been recovered at pre-contact high-altitude locations throughout Andean south America.”

  48. 48.

    For further documentation of the relationship between Amerindian religion and warfare, consult (Chacon and Dye 2007; Chacon and Mendoza 2007a, b).

  49. 49.

    Catawba warriors were considered as being among the most accomplished fighters in the Southeast (Heath 2004).

  50. 50.

    For example, Lewis and Clark’s Shoshone guide named Sacagawea was captured by a Hidatsa raiding party. Eventually, she was taken as a wife by the French trapper named Charbonneau, who had won her in a bet with the warriors who had captured her (Ambrose 1996).

  51. 51.

    On August 29, 1991, Chacon interviewed Helena Valero, who was captured by the Yanomamö at the age of 11 years. This Brazilian woman lived among this Amazonian group for 20 years before her escape. For a detailed account of her ordeal, see Biocca (1970) and Cocco (1972).

  52. 52.

    Enormous concentrations of stake remnants have been identified throughout southeastern Alaska. According to Langdon, “it is likely that more than 10,000 buried wooden stakes are found in Little Salt Lake” (Langdon 2007: 245).

  53. 53.

    According to Trimborn (1949), some Cauca Valley slaves were subjected to the removal of one of their incisors as a sign of their subjugated status.

  54. 54.

    There are reports of some Guaicurú keeping captives in their service as late as 1892 (Santos-Granero 2009).

  55. 55.

    Remarkably, some contemporary Yup’ik leaders claim that homicide never occurred among Eskimos until the advent of whites (Fienup-Riordan 1990).

  56. 56.

    Igoe (2004) documents that after a 15-year-long campaign resulting in 15 deaths and no Indian casualties, Kayapo territory was free of outsiders.

  57. 57.

    The Kayapo received critical support in their efforts to stop this proposed hydroelectric dam from Conservation International (Dowie 2009).

  58. 58.

    The Kayapo’s success in halting the construction of the dam has been tinged by reports of indigenous leaders personally benefiting from signing contracts granting outsiders permission to log and mine reservation lands (Borgerhoff and Coppolillo 2005; Dowie 2009).

  59. 59.

    Fortunately, no Bakairí or illegal colonists were killed in the Paixola raid (Debra Picchi, personal communication to Chacon, 2010).

  60. 60.

    The editors do not believe that the Bakairí should be denounced as “savages” for having defended their territory. Moreover, we do not feel that the anthropologist who documented these actions is guilty of denigrating Amerindians.

  61. 61.

    Chacon and Mendoza have recently visited the site on two separate occasions. There is still no mention (either along one of the location’s many trails or in the site’s visitor center) of these sacrificial victims at Cahokia.

  62. 62.

    See Caplan (2010) for discussion of how the Western media may sensationalize reports of native violence.

  63. 63.

    See Picchi (2006) and Santos-Granero (2009, 2000) for examples of contextualized reporting of violence among Amerindians.

  64. 64.

    Additional harvesting of trees was conducted to meet dwelling construction, food, and fuel needs of Mississippian peoples (Davis 2000).

  65. 65.

    A formidable body of scholarship has been assembled to document indigenous environmental impacts in the Maya region (Abrams and Rue 1988; Beach et al. 2006; Demarest et al. 2004; Earle 1997; Emery et al. 2000; Foias and Bishop 1997; Hodell et al. 1995; Santley et al. 1986; Sabloff 1990; Sharer 1994; Shaw 2003; Wright and White 1987).

  66. 66.

    Other tribes involved in this trade included the Creeks who exchanged furs at New Orleans and the Shawnee who traded skins with the Ohio Valley Company (Davis 2000).

  67. 67.

    Hudson notes that by the late eighteenth century, deer were scarce in parts of the Southeast (1981).

  68. 68.

    Likewise, Hames (2000) points out that native peoples have been part of the environment for thousands of years in their role as keystone predators. As such, they are as much of an integral part of the ecosystem “as the endangered jaguar and puma” (Hames 2000: 226).

  69. 69.

    Ferguson (1990: 34) also notes that “[h]ostilities can create buffer zones where natural resources may be replenished, free from human exploitation.”

  70. 70.

    Likewise, Tanzania’s plains that are so famous for harboring large numbers of East African wildlife are, in fact, the product of regular burning by local Maasai peoples (Igoe 2004).

  71. 71.

    The Mono Lake Paiutes were known to raid the Miwok (Kroeber 1921; Merriam 1917).

  72. 72.

    Although forcibly removed in 1851 by the Californian volunteer Mariposa Battalion, some Miwok later returned to Yosemite Valley and remained there as late as 1898 (Kroeber 1921; Merriam 1917).

  73. 73.

    See Robarchek (1990) for an association between warfare and environmental degradation among pre-contact Puebloans.

  74. 74.

    See Chap. 13 for a similar association between Amazonian warfare and secretive foraging (i.e., Achuar hunting camp) distributions.

  75. 75.

    Indeed, Native American scholars Roger Echo-Hawk (2000) and David Wildcat (2009) call for the creation of honest and respectful collaborations between scientists and indigenous communities.

  76. 76.

    Bodley’s writings reinforce this notion. In an attempt to create a general definition for indigenous people that can be applied globally, he characterizes native peoples as being “united in their opposition to technologies and development projects that they consider destructive and unnecessary” (Bodley 1999:147). In fact, modern-day Amerindian leaders often disagree with regard to what constitutes acceptable types of development (Krech 2005; Niezen 2009).

  77. 77.

    For further discussion of Native American identity and environmentalism, see Krech (2005).

  78. 78.

    According to Santos-Granero, “the denial of Amerindian-induced environmental degradation may cause harm insofar as it may reinforce the essentialist conviction that native peoples are sage and benevolent ‘guardians of the forest’ regardless of the historical situation in which they are immersed” (Fernando Santos-Granero, personal communication to Chacon 2009).

  79. 79.

    According to Oakes, “laudable efforts towards the preservation of indigenous cultures and values should not be confused with the search for truth” (Gregory Oakes, personal communication to Chacon 2009).

  80. 80.

    According to Gowdy (2006: 349), “[w]e can learn much from an examination of what worked and did not work in past societies in achievement of longrun sustainability.”

  81. 81.

    This is significant as Western governments often favor indigenous leaders who are willing to allow the extraction of natural resources from tribal lands regardless of environmental consequences (Ranco 2007).

  82. 82.

    Gross and Plattner (2002: 4) state that “anthropological researchers have an obligation to return something of value to communities where research is done.”

  83. 83.

    Some indigenous groups appear to have “a single-minded collective attention to trade goods as a massive obsession” as the result of a series of historical processes that have caused Indians to become economically dependent on outsiders (Fisher 2000: 2). For example, among the Xikrin Kayapó, the passion for trade goods spurred tribal leaders to encourage outsiders to set up mining and logging operations on Indian lands (Fisher 2000). See Hugh-Jones (1992) for documentation of how the material wants of Amazonian peoples may significantly change once they come into contact with the Western world.

  84. 84.

    Another example of the serious environmental challenges native peoples face can be found among Waimiri Atroari of Brazil whose population is growing by 7% per year. This trend will result in an increased need for substantially more food resources in the near future (Souza-Mazurek et al. 2000). See also Werner (1983).

  85. 85.

    According to Fienup-Riordan, the failure on the part of Westerners to understand the role that Amerindian warfare played in the forging of native alliances will hamper efforts at understanding the political situation of many contemporary tribes. The characterization of indigenous peoples as pacifists can “cloud our understanding of the less-than-peaceful present” (1990:166).

  86. 86.

    Cited from Chacon, unpublished field notes.

  87. 87.

    Along these lines, Lovisek notes that “the history of violence is a part of the history of native peoples, as it is for others. An understanding of this aspect of their history is essential for understanding their contemporary relationships with other groups, the origin of many of their ceremonies, the geographic extent of their territories, their genealogies, and their contact with Europeans” (Joan Lovisek, personal communication to Chacon, 2011).

  88. 88.

    Gregor and Plattner state that “the primary responsibility of a researcher is to do excellent research. Doing incompetent research is a favor to no one” (2002:4).

  89. 89.

    Trigger (1997:x) urges anthropologists to practice responsible scholarship lest the discipline “descend into mythography, political opportunism, and bad science.”

  90. 90.

    Social evolutionism has been denounced for allegedly being a myth created by Western scholars to justify colonialism (Sioui 1992). However, Trigger (1993) points out that all modern civilizations arose from Paleolithic hunter–gatherer societies.

  91. 91.

    See Robarchek (1990) for an association between warfare, environmental degradation, and tribalization among pre-contact Puebloans.

  92. 92.

    According to Bishop, “any attempt on the part of anthropologists or other scholars to conceal data will eventually be exposed and the works of those who obfuscated the evidence will be viewed negatively” (Charles A. Bishop, personal communication to Chacon, 2010).

  93. 93.

    Lancaster and Hames (2011) also warn against the abandonment of evidence-based anthropological research.

  94. 94.

    Along these lines, Lovisek argues that “all anthropological theory is (or should be) subject to falsification by empirical evidence. Failure to consider significant aspects of culture (such as warfare and violence) would ultimately lead to a partial and distorted view of native societies. The failure to consider and publish Amerindian warfare would ultimately contribute to impeachable theories and discredit the anthropological enterprise” (Joan Lovisek, personal communication to Chacon, 2011).

  95. 95.

    According to Trigger, for Maya, Aztec, and Inka peoples, the existence of social inequality would have been accepted as a normal/natural condition: “Every child would have been born into a family that had been shaped in the image of the state” (Trigger 1993:53).

  96. 96.

    Hames echoes this sentiment by adding the following: “We anthropologists have an ethical obligation to report our findings to the agency funding our research in an honest and forthright manner” (Raymond Hames, personal communication to Chacon, 2010).

  97. 97.

    Along these lines, Keely states the following: “Today, popular opinion finds it difficult to attribute to tribal peoples a capacity for rapaciousness, cruelty, ecological heedlessness, and Machiavellian guile equal to our own…Both laypersons and academics now prefer a vision of tribal peoples as lambs in Eden, sprouting ecological mysticism and disdain for the material conditions of life…When we attribute to primitive and prehistoric people only our virtues and none of our vice, we dehumanize them as much as ourselves” (Keely 1996:170).

  98. 98.

    According to Dodds-Pennock, “revisionists who deny the existence of pre-contact Amerindian ritual violence are essentially buying into the colonial perspective which depicted it as a horrific an unexplainable savage practice” (Caroline Dodds-Pennock, personal communication to Chacon, 2010).

  99. 99.

    Fienup-Riordan (1990) holds that social scientists should not replace a certain stereotype of Amerindian society for another, but rather she calls for the replacement of false images with one that is supported by evidence.

  100. 100.

    Milner notes that “if we are going to say something useful about human behavior, we make no contribution by saying that native people are either ‘peaceful’ or ‘warlike’ in nature. To do so reduces Amerindians to cardboard cutouts as put forth by Rousseau and Hobbs. Amerindians are as complicated as we are. If we want to learn something about the human condition, we need to move beyond these cardboard cutout images” (George Milner, personal communication to Chacon 2009). Fausto also recently voiced his concern over this issue: “Anthropological theory building is hampered by the ‘ecologically noble savage’ vs. the ‘bloodthirsty savage’ dichotomy. This simplistic notion does not do justice to the socio-cultural complexity of Amerindian societies. Furthermore, the upholding of either one of these positions will be of no help to contemporary native peoples” (Carlos Fausto, personal communication to Chacon 2009).

  101. 101.

    The editors point to The Baikirí Indians of Brazil: Politics, Ecology, and Change by Debra Picchi (2006) as an example of how it is fully possible to report accurately instances of Amerindian-induced environmental degradation and violence without degrading or demeaning native peoples.

References

  • Abrams, Elliot M., and David J. Rue. 1988. The Causes and Consequences of Deforestation Among the Prehistoric Maya. Human Ecology 16(4): 377–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam, S. K. 2009. Extinction or Survival? The Remarkable Story of the Tigua, An Urban American Indian Tribe. Boulder: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvard, M. 1993. “Testing the ‘Ecologically Noble Savage’ Hypothesis: Inter-specific Prey Choice by Piro Hunters of Amazonian Peru.” Human Ecology vol. 21(4):355–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvard, M. 1994. “Conservation by Native Peoples: Prey Choice in a Depleted Habitat.” Human Nature vol. 5(2):127–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvard, M. 1995. “Intraspecific Prey Choice by Amazonian Hunters.” Current Anthropology vol. 36(5):789–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvard, M. 1997. “Comments.” Current Anthropology vol. 38(4):609–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvard, M. 1998a. “Indigenous Hunting in the Tropics: Conservation or Optimal Foraging?” In: Behavioral Ecology and Conservation Biology. T. Caro (ed.) Pp. 474–500. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvard, M. 1998b. “Evolutionary Ecology and Resource Conservation.” Evolutionay Anthropology vol. 7:62–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, Stephen. 1996. Undaunted Courage: Meriwether Lewis, Thomas Jefferson, and the Opening off the American West. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, Kenneth and H. Maschner. 1999. Peoples of the Northwest Coast: Their Archaeology and Prehistory. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. Kat. 2005. Tending the Wild: Native American Knowledge and the Management of California’s Natural Resources. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, L. 1966. Indian Slave Trade in the Southwest. Los Angeles: Westernlore Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balée, William. 1987. “Cultural Forests of the Amazon.” Garden vol. 11:12–14, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balée, W. 1989. “The Culture of Amazonian Forests.” In: Resource Management inAmazonia: Indigenous and Folk Strategies. D. Posey and W. Balée (eds.). The Bronx: New York Botanical Gardens. Pp. 1–21. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, T., N. Dunning, S. Luzzadder-Beach, Cook, and Lohse. 2006. Impacts of the Ancient Maya on Soils and Soil Erosion in the Central Maya Lowlands. Catena 65(2): 166–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman, Stephen and James Yost. 2007. “Upper Amazonian Warfare.” In: North American Indigenous Warfare and Ritual Violence. R. Chacon and R. Mendoza (eds.). Pp. 142–179. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berks, F. 1999. Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biocca, Etorre. 1970. Yanoáma: The Narrative of a White Girl Kidnapped by Amazonian Indians as Told to Etorre Biocca. New York: E. P. Dutton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliege Bird, R. and E. Smith 2005. “Signaling Theory, Strategic Interaction and Symbolic Capital.” Current Anthropology vol.46:221–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliege Bird, R., E. Smith and D. Bird. 2001. “The Hunting Handicap: Costly Signaling in Male Foraging Strategies.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology vol. 50:9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodley, John. 1999. Victims of Progress. Fourth Edition. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgerhoff, Monique and Peter Coppolillo. 2005. Conservation: Linking Ecology, Economics and Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrie, W., R. Firth and J. Spillus. 1957. “The Population of Tikopia, 1929 and 1952.” Population Studies vol. 10(3):229–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, E., and L. Greenbaum. 1973. Diversity and Homogeneity. New Haven: HRAF Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxberger, Daniel. 1997. “Amerindian Slavery, Pacific Northwest.” In: The Historical Encyclopedia of World Slavery,.Vol. 1. Junius Rodriguez (ed.). Pp. 36. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brightman, Robert. 1983. “Animal and Human in Rock Cree Religion and Subsistence.” Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brightman, Robert. 1993. Grateful Prey: Rock Cree Human-Animal Relationships. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockington, D. 2002. Fortress Conservation: The Preservation of the Makomazi Game Reserve, Tanzania. Oxford: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broughton, J. 1994a. “Declines in Mammalian Foraging Efficiency During the Late Holocene, San Francisco Bay, California.” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology vol. 13:371–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broughton J. 1994b. “Late Holocene Resource Intensification in the Sacramento Valley, California: The Vertebrate Evidence.” Journal of Archaeological Science vol. 21:501–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broughton, J. 1997. “Widening Diet Breadth, Declining Foraging Efficiency and Prehistoric Harvest Pressure: Ichthyofaunal Evidence From Emeryville Shellmound, California.” Antiquity vol. 71:845–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buege, Douglass. 1996. “The Ecologically Noble Savage Revisited.” Environmental Ethics vol. 18:71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, V. 2010. “Resource Depression on the Northwest Coast of North America.” Antiquity vol. 74:649–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Sarah and Virginia Butler. 2010. “Fishes and Loaves? Explaining Sustainable, Long-Term Animal Harvesting on the Northwest Coast Using the Plant Paradigm.” In: The Archaeology of Anthropogenic Environments. Pp. 175–203. R. Dean (ed.). Carbondale, IL: Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, Pat. 2010. “Child Sacrifice in Uganda? The BBC, Witch Doctors and Anthropologists.” Anthropology Today vol. 26(2):4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro, Robert. 1990. “Chiefdom-level Warfare as Exemplified in Fiji and the Cauca Valley.” In: The Anthropology of War. J. Haas (ed.). Pp. 190–211. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro, Robert. (nd). “The Circumscription Theory: A Clarification, Amplification, and Reformulation.” Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceruti, Maria Constanza. 2003. Llullaillaco: Sacrificios y Ofrendas en un Santuario Inca de Alta Montaña. Salta: Universidad Catolica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chacon, Richard. 2001. Testing the Energy Maximization and the Time Minimization Hypotheses: The Effects of Shotgun Technology on Achuar Indian Hunting. Ann Arbor: UMI Dissertation Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chacon, Richard. 2005. “Conservation or Resource Maximization? Hunting Among of the Achuar (Shiwiar) of the Ecuadorian Amazon.” Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association Annual Meeting in Washington DC. November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chacon, Richard. 2007. “Seeking The Headhunter’s Power: The Quest for Arutam Among the Achuar Indians of the Ecuadorian Amazon and the Development of Ranked Societies” In: The Taking and Displaying of Human Body Parts as Trophies by Amerindians. Richard Chacon and David Dye (eds.). New York: Springer Press. Pp. 523–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chacon, Richard. 2009. “Do Amazonian Blowgun Hunters Forage With Sustainability in Mind?” Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association Annual Meeting in Philadelphia, PA. December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chacon, Richard and David Dye. 2007. The Taking and Displaying of Human Body Parts as Trophies by Amerindians. New York: Springer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chacon, Richard and Charles Kay. 2005. “Aboriginal Hunting and the Original State of Nature: Were Amerindian Harvests Sustainable?” Organized session at the American Anthropological Association Annual Meeting in Washington DC. November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chacon, Richard and Ruben Mendoza. 2007a. North American Indigenous Warfare and Ritual Violence. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chacon, Richard and Ruben Mendoza. 2007b. Latin American Indigenous Warfare and Ritual Violence. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chacon, Richard, Yamilette Chacon and Angel Guandinango. 2007. “The Inti Raymi Festival Among the Cotacachi and Otavalo of Highland Ecuador.” In: Latin American Indigenous Warfare. R. Chacon and R. Mendoza (eds.) Pp. 116–141. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chacon, Yamilette. 2009. “In Inquiry into Inka Power Structures.” Masters Thesis, Department of Sociology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chagnon, Napoleon. 1997. The Yanomamö 5th edition. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, M. 2000. Defending Kuna Yala: Pemansky, the Study Project for the Wildlands of Kuna Yala, Panama. Washington DC: USAID Biodiversity Support Program

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobo, Bernabé. 1990. Inca Religion and Customs. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocco, Luis. 1972. Iyëwei-teri: Quince Años Entre Los Yanomamos. Caracas: Libreria Editorial Salesiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, Michael and Rex Koontz. 2008. Mexico: From the Olmecs to the Aztecs. London: Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, Beth. 2003. “Speaking Truth to Power.” Anthropology News vol. 44(7):3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, Beth and Laura Graham. 1995. “The Shifting Middle Ground: Amazonian Indians and Eco-Politics.” American Anthropologist vol. 97(4):695–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, Eduardo. 2010. The Grand Araucanian Wars (1541–1883) in the Kingdom of Chile. Santiago: Xlibris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuhlane, Dara. 1992. “Adding Insult to Injury: Her Majesty’s Loyal Anthropologist.” BC Studies vol. 95:66–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling, J. A. 1998. “Mass Inhumation and the Execution of Witches in the American Southwest.” American Anthropologist vol. 100:732–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Donald. 2000. Where There Are Mountains: An Environmental History. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Stephen and Brett Riggs. 2004. “An Introduction to the Catawba Project.” North Carolina Archaeology vol. 53:1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demarest, Arthur A., Prudence M. Rice, and Don S. Rice (Eds.). 2004. The Terminal Classic in the Maya Lowlands: Collapse, Transition, and Transformation. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, Mathew. 1999. “Makahs and Grey Whales: Not Black and White.” The Ecotone: The Journal of Environmental Studies, University of Oregon. (Fall):3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doggett, Scott. 1999. Panama. Hawthorn, Australia: Lonely Planet Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, Leland. 1997. Aboriginal Slavery on the Northwest Coast of North America. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowie, Mark. 2009. Conservation Refugees: The Hundred-Year Conflict between Global Conservation and Native Peoples. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, Richard. 2001. A History of Appalachia. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreger, Alice. 2011. “Darkness’s Descent on the American Anthropological Association: A Cautionary Tale.” Human Nature  <  DOI: 10.1007/s12110-011-9103-y.  >  Accessed April 22, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drimmer, Frederick. 1961. Captured by the Indians: 15 Firsthand Accounts, 1750–1870. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, Harold. 1969. Indians of North America. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, Timothy. 1991. Chiefdoms: Power, Economy and Ideology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, Timothy. 1997. How Chiefs Come to Power: The Political Economy in Prehistory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echo-Hawk, Roger. 2000. “Ancient History in the New World: Integrating Oral Traditions and the Archaeological Record.” American Antiquity vol. 65(2):267–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton, Robert. 1992. Sick Societies: Challenging the Myth of Primitive Harmony. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Editor. 1999. “Editor’s Note.” The Ecotone: The Journal of Environmental Studies, University of Oregon. (Fall):2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson, Robert. 2001. “The Evolution of Social Norms: A Perspective from the Legal Academy.” In: Social Norms. M. Hechter and K. Opp (eds.). Pp. 35–75. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emanuelson, Pamela and David Willer. 2010. “Prehistory and Social Evolution: Transitions for Chiefdom to the State.” Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Meeting, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, Kitty F., Lori E. Wright, and Henry Schwarcz. 2000. Isotopic Analysis of Ancient Deer Bone: Biotic Stability in Collapse Period Maya Land-Use. Journal of Archaeological Science 27(6):537–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht, William. 2003. Iroquoia: The Development of a Native World. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, C. 2003. “Historical Ecology and Future Explorations.” In: Amazonian Dark Earths. J. Lehmann, D. Kern, B. Glaser, and W. Woods (eds.). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Pp. 455–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, C. 2006. “The Domesticated landscapes of the Bolivian Amazon.” In: Time and Complexity in Historical Ecology. W. Balée and C. Erickson (eds.). New York: Columbia University Press. Pp. 235–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, C and W. Balée. 2006. “The Historical Ecology of a Complex Landscape in Bolivia.” In: Time and Complexity in Historical Ecology. W. Balée and C. Erickson (eds.). New York: Columbia University Press. Pp. 187–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Brian. 1990. “Explaining War.” In: The Anthropology of War. Pp. 26–55. J. Haas (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Brian. 1992. “A Savage Encounter: Western Contact and the Yanomami Tribal Zone.” In: War in the Tribal Zone: Expanding Staes and Indigenous Warfare. B. Ferguson and N. Whitehead (eds.). Pp. 199–227. School of American Research Advanced Seminar Series. Oxford: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Brian and Neil Whitehead. 1999. “The Violent Edge of Empire.” In: War in the Tribal Zone: Expanding Staes and Indigenous Warfare. B. Ferguson and N. Whitehead (eds.). Pp. 1–30. School of American Research Advanced Seminar Series. Oxford: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fienup-Riordan. 1990. Eskimo Essays: Yup’ik Lives and How We See Them. New Bruswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, Raymond. 1983. We, the Tikopia: A Sociological Study of Kinship in Primitive Polynesia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, William. 2000. The Frontier Within. Washington DC: Smithsonian Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foias, Antonia E., and Ronald L. Bishop. 1997. Changing Ceramic Production and Exchange in the Petexbatun Region, Guatemala: Reconsidering the Classic Maya Collapse. Ancient Mesoamerica 8: 275–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, Merwyn. 1976. Native American Heritage. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkle, A., D. Young, R. Yohe II. 2010. “Bighorn Hunting, Resource Depression, and Rock Art in the Coso Range, Eastern California; A Computer Simulation Model.” Journal of Archaeological Science vol. 37:42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, Richard. 2008. “Updating Martin’s Global Extinction Model.” Quaternary Science Reviews vol. 27:2522–2529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Irvin. 1955. “Status Rivalry and Cultural Evolution in Polynesia.” American Anthropologist vol. 57(4):680–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Irvin. 1960. “The Evolution of Polynesian Societies.” In: Culture in History: Essays in Honor of Paul Radin. S. Diamond (ed.). Pp. 687–712. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowdy, John. 2006. “Darwinian Selection and Cultural Incentives for Resource Use: Tikopia as a Case Study.” International Journal of Global Environmental Issues vol. 6(4):348–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Daniel and Stuart Plattner. 2002. “Anthropology as Social Work: Collaborative Models of Anthropological Research.” Anthropology News vol. 43(8):4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurven, M. and K. Hill. 2009. “Why Do Men Hunt?” Current Anthropology vol. 50(1):51–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hames, R. 2000. “Wildlife Conservation in Tribal Societies.” In: Preserving Wildlife: An International Perspective. M. Michael (ed,). Pp. 210–235. New York: Humanity Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K. 1991. “Showing Off: Tests of a Hypothesis About Men’s Foraging Goals.” Ethology and Sociobiology vol.12:29–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K., and R. Bliege Bird. 2002. “Showing Off, Handicap Signaling, and the Evolution of Men’s Work.” Evolutionary Anthropology vol. 11:58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Charles. 2004. “Catawba Militarism: An Ethnohistorical and Archaeological Review.” North Carolina Archaeology vol. 53:80–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K. 1996. “The Mbaracayú Reserve and the Aché of Paraguay.” In: Traditional Peoples and Biodiversity Conservation in Large Tropical Landscapes. K Redford, and J. Mansour (eds.). Arlington, VA: The Nature Conservancy. Pp. 159–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock, Robert, Maria Sapignoli and Wayne Babchuk. 2011. “What About Our Rights? Settlements, Subsistence and Livelihood Security Among Central Kalahari San and Bakgalagadi.” The International Journal of Human Right vol. 15(1):62–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodell, David A., Jason H. Curtis, and Mark Brenner. 1995. Possible Role of Climate in the Collapse of Classic Maya Civilization. Nature 375 (June): 391–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, J. 1998. A People Who Would Not Kneel: Panama, the United Sates and the San Blass Kuna. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson Jr., C. 1981. “Why the Southeastern Indians Slaughtered Deer.” In: Indians, Animals, and the Fur Trade: A Critique of Keepers of the Game. S. Krech III (ed.). Pp.157-173. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugh-Jones, S. 1992. “Yesterday’s Luxuries, Tomorrow’s Necessities: Business and Barter in Northwest Amazonia.” In: Barter, Exchange and Value: An Anthropological Approach. C. Humphrey and S. Hugh-Jones (eds.). Pp. 42–74. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Igoe, Jim. 2004. Conservation and Globalization: A Study of Parks and Indigenous Communities from East Africa to South Dakota. Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Jean. 1991. “Being and Becoming Indian in the Vaupés: In: Nation-States in Latin America. G. Urban and J. Sherzer (eds.). Pp. 131–155. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janetski, J. 1997. “Freemont Hunting and Resource Intensification in the Eastern Great Basin.” Journal of Archaeological Science vol. 24:1075–1088.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Allen and Timothy Earle. 2000. The Evolution of Human Societies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Charles. 1994. “Aboriginal Overkill: The Role of Native Americans in Structuring Western Ecosystems.” Human Nature vol. 5(4):359–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Charles. 1998. “Are Ecosystems Structured From the Top-Down or Bottom-Up: A New Look at an Old Debate.” Wildlife Society Bulletin vol. 26(3):484–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Charles. 2007. “Were Native Peoples Keystone Predators? A Continuous-Time Analysis of wildlife Observations Made by Lewis and Clark in 1804–1806.” The Canadian Field Journalist vol. 121(1):1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Charles. 2010. “The Kaibab Deer Incident.” Muleycrazey.com. January/February. Pp. 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, C. and R. Simmons. 2002. Wilderness and Political Ecology: Aboriginal Influences on the Original State of Nature. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keely, L. 1996. War Before Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirch, Patrick. 1997. “Microcosmic Histories: Island Perspectives on ‘Global’ Change.” American Anthropologist vol. 99(1):30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirch, Patrick. 2007. “Three Islands and an Archipelago: Reciprocal Interactions Between Humans and Island Ecosystems in Polynesia.” Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh vol. 98:85–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirch, Patrick. 2010. How Chiefs Became Kings: Divine Kingship and the Rise of Archaic States in Ancient Hawai’i. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirch, Patrick and Douglas Yen. 1982. The Prehistory and Ecology of a Polynesia Outlier. Honolulu: Bishop Museum Bulletin no. 238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krech, Shepard III. 2005. “Reflections on Conservation, Sustainability, and Environmentalism in Indigenous North America.” American Anthropologist vol. 107(1):78–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, Alfred. 1921. “Indians of Yosemite.” In: Handbook of Yosemite National Park. Ansel Hall (ed.). Pp. 51–73. New York and London: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, Alfred. 1951. “Olive Oatman’s Return.” Berkeley: Krober Anthropological Society Papers No. 4. Pp.1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuper, Adam. 2003 “The Return of the Native.” Current Anthropology vol. 44(3):389–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, Jane and Raymond Hames. 2011. “Statement on the Publication of Alice Dreger’s Investigation, Darkness’s Descent on the American Anthropology Association: A Cautionary Tale.” Human Nature. <D0I 10.1007/s12110-011-9106-8  >  Accessed April 22, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdon, Stephen. 2007. “Sustaining a Relationship: Inquiry into the Emergence of a Logic of Engagement With Salmon Among the Southern Tlingits.” In: Native Americans and the Environment: Perspectives on the Ecological Indian. M. Harkin and D. Lewis (eds.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Pp. 231–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legros, Dominique. 1985. “Wealth, Poverty, and Slavery Among 19th Century Tutchone Athapaskans.” Research in Economic Anthropology vol. 7:37–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, Kent G., and Otis Parrish. 2009. California Indians and their Environment. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopinot, Neal and William Woods. 1993. “Wood Overexpoliation and the Collapse of Cahokia.” In: Foraging and Farming in the Eastern Woodlands. C. Scarry (ed.). Pp. 206–231. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovisek, Joan. 2007. “Aboriginal Warfare on the Northwest Coast: Did the Potlatch Replace Warfare?” In: North American Indigenous Warfare and Ritual Violence. R. Chacon and R. Mendoza (eds). Pp. 58–73. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacPhee, R., and M. Iturralde, and O. Jimenez. 2007. “Prehistoric Sloth Extinctions in Cuba: Implications of a New ‘Last’ Appearance Date.” Caribbean Journal of Science vol. 43(1):94–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Charles. 2005. 1491: New Revelations Before Columbus. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. 1978. Keepers of the Game: Indian Animal Relationships and the Fur Trade. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGhee, Robert. 2008. “Aboriginalism and the Problems of Indigenous Archaeology.” American Antiquity vol. 73(4):579–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melody, Michael. 1989. The Apache. New York: Chelsea House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, Ruben. 1975. “The Nahuatl Temples and Their Relationship to Cosmology.” Southwestern Anthropological Association Newsletter. Vol. 15(1):3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, Ruben. 1992. “Conquest Polities of the Mesoamerican Epiclassic: Circum-Basin Regionalism, A.D. 550–850.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, Ruben. 2001. “Tribal Warfare.” In: Magill’s Guide to Military History. J. Powell (ed.). Pp. 1559–1561. Pasadena: Salem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, Ruben. 2003. “Lords of the Medicine Bag: Medical Science and Traditional Practice in Ancient Peru and South America.” In: Medicine Across Cultures: History and Practice of Medicine in Non-Western Cultures. H. Selin (ed.), Pp. 225–257. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, Ruben. 2010. “Warfare.” In: Encyclopedia of Latin America, Volume 1: Amerindians through Foreign Colonization. Pp. 308–313. J. Francis (ed.). Washington: Facts on File.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, Ruben. nd. “The Americas, AD 1300–1500.” In: The Cambridge History of War, Volume 2. D. Graff (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, Clinton. 1917. “Indian Village and Camp Sites in Yosemite Valley.” Sierra Club Bulletin vol. 10(2):202–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, John. 1996. The Cheyenne. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, Madonna. 1999. “Whale Hunt Honors Makah Way of Life.” The Ecotone: The Journal of Environmental Studies, University of Oregon. (Fall):4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Robert 1960. Headhunter’s Heritage. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musters, George Chadsworth. 1969. At Home With the Patagonians. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, R. 1998. Imposing Wilderness: Struggles Over Livelihood and Nature Preservation in Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niezen, Ronald. 2009. Defending of the Land: Sovereignty and Forest Life in James Cree Bay Society. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, Alfonso. 1972. “An Indian Anthropologist’s Perspective on Anthropology.” In: American Anthropological Association, Symposium on Anthropology and the American Indian. Pp. 85–92. San Francisco: Indian Historian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otterbein, Keith. 2000. “The Doves Have Been Heard from, Where are the Hawks?” American Anthropologist vol. 102(4):841–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, Bruce and Marilyn Norconk. 1987. “Analysis of the Human Burials, 1977–1983 Field Seasons: Demographic Profiles and Burial Practices.” In: Archaeological Field Research in the Upper Mantaro, Peru: Investigations of Inka Expansion and Exchange. T. Earle, T. D’Altroy, C. Hastorf, C. Scott, C. Costin and E. Sandefur (eds.). Pp. 107–123. Los Angeles: Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perdue, Theda. 1979. Slavery and the Evolution of Cherokee Society. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, S. 2005. “Caribbean Extinctions: Climate Change Probably Wasn’t the Culprit.” Science News, October 29, 2005. Accessed March 18, 2009. <http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_ml200/is_18_168/ai_nl5861082 >

  • Picchi, Debra. 2006. The Baikirí Indians of Brazil: Politics, Ecology, and Change. Long Grove: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieto, Alfredo and Rodrigo Cardenas. 2007. “The Struggle for Social Life in Fuego-Patagonia.” In: North American Indigenous Warfare and Ritual Violence. R. Chacon and R. Mendoza (eds.). Pp. 212–233. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raab, Mark and Terry Jones. 2004. Prehistoric California: Archaeology and the Myth of Paradise. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranco, Darren. 2007. “The Ecological Indian and the Politics of Representation.” In: Native Americans and the Environment: Perspectives on the Ecological Indian. M. Harkin and D. Lewis (eds.). Pp. 32–51. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, Michelle. 1990. “The Point of No Diminishing Returns: Hunting and Resource Decline on Boigu Island, Torres Strait.” Ph. D. Dissertation. University of California, Davis. Ann Arbor: UMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redford, K. 1991. “The Ecologically Noble Savage.” Cultural Survival vol. 15(1):46–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redmond, Elsa. 1998. Chiefdoms and Chieftaincy in the Americas. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redmond, Elsa, Rafael Gasson and Charles Spencer. 1999. “A Macroregional View of Cycling Chiefdoms in the Western Venezuelan Llanos.” Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association. No 9. Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, Nelson. 1964. The Caste War of Yucatan. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritche, William. 1956. “The Indian and His Environment.” Conservationist (December-January). Pp.1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robarchek, Clayton. 1990. Warfare and the Evolution of Tribal Polities in the Prehistoric Southwest.” In: The Anthropology of War. J. Haas (ed.). Pp. 171–189. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robarchek, Clayton and Carole Robarchek. 1998. Waorani: The Contexts of Violence and War. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt, Anna. 1989. “Lost Civilizations of the Lower Amazon.” Natural History. February. Pp. 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, Steven. 2007. “Circulation, Accumulation, and the Power of Shuar Shrunken Heads.” Cultural Anthropology vol. 22(3):357–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabloff, Jeremy. 1990. The New Archaeology and the Ancient Maya. New York: W.H. Freeman & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santley, Robert S., Thomas W. Killion, and Mark T. Lycett. 1986. On the Maya Collapse. Journal of Anthropological Research 42(2): 123–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Granero, Fernando. 1992. Etnohistoria de la Alta Amazonia. Quito: Editorial Abya-Yala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Granero, Fernando. 2000. “The Enemy Within: Child Sorcery, Revolution, and the Evils of Modernization in Eastern Peru. In: Darkness and Secrecy: the Anthropology of Assault Sorcery and Witchcraft in Amazonia. Neil. Whitehead and R. Wright (eds.). Pp. 272–305. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Granero, Fernando. 2009. Vital Enemies: Slavery, Predation, and the Amerindian Political Economy of Life. Austin: Texas University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaafsma, Polly. 2000. Warrior, Shield, and Star: Imagery and Ideology of Pueblo Warfare. Santa Fe: Western Edge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharer, Robert. 1994. The Ancient Maya, fifth edition. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Justine M. 2003. Climate Change and Deforestation: Implications for the Maya Collapse. Ancient Mesoamerica 14: 157–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sioui, Georges.1992. For an Amerindian Autohistory: An Essay on the Foundations of a Social Ethic. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirén, Anders, Peter Hamback, and José Machoa. 2004. “Including Spatial Heterogeneity and Animal Dispersal When Evaluating Hunting: a Model Analysis and an Empirical Assessment in an Amazonian Community.” Conservation Biology vol. 18(5):1315–1329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. 2004. “Why Do Good Hunters Have Higher Reproductive Success?” Human Nature vol. 15(4):343–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. and M. Wishnie. 2000. “Conservation and Subsistence in Small-Scale Societies.” Annual Review of Anthropology vol. 29:493–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, F., S. Elliott and S. Lyons. 2010. “Methane Emissions from Extinct Megafauna.” Nature Geoscience vol. 3:374–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, Dean. 2007. “Iroquois-Huron Warfare.” In: North American Indigenous Warfare and Ritual Violence. R. Chacon and R. Mendoza (eds.). Pp. 149–159. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, Dean. 2010. Archaeology of Native North America. Boston: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza-Mazurek, R., T. Pedrinho, X. Feliciano, W. Hilario, S. Gerôncio, and E. Marcelo. 2000. “Subsistence Hunting Among the Waimiri Atroari Indians of Central Amazonia.” Biodiversity and Conservation vol. 9:579–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Charles. 2007. “Territorial Expansion and Primary Stae Formation on Oaxaca, Mexico.” In: North American Indigenous Warfare and Ritual Violence. R. Chacon and R. Mendoza (eds.). Pp. 55–72. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, D., P. Martin, R. MacPhee, A. Tull, H. McDonlad, C. Woods, M. Iturralde, and G. Hodgins. 2005. “Asynchronous Extinction of Late Quaternary Sloths on Continents and Islands.” Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences vol. 102(33):11763–11768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearman, A. 1984. “The Yuquí Connection: Another Look at Sirionó Deculturation.” American Anthropologist vol. 86(3):630–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearman, A. 1994. “Only Slaves Climb Trees: Revisiting the Myth of the Ecologically Noble Savage in Amazonia.” Human Nature vol. 5(4):339–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, Julian. and Louis Faron. 1959. Native Peoples of South America. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratton, R. 1983. Captivity of the Oatman Girls. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taube, Karl. 1993. Aztec and Maya Myths. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Colin. 1975. The Warriors of the Plains. New York: Arco Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Colin. 2001. Native American Weapons. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, J. 1992. “Maintenance of Diversity in Tropical Forests: A Matter of Stewardship.” Biotropica vol. 24:283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, J. 1999. Requiem for Nature. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurman, Melburn. 1983. “The Timing of the Skidi-Pawnee Morning Star Sacrifice.” Ethnohistory vol. 3(3):155–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tizon, Alex. 1999. “Makah Whale Hunt Spurs Racist Comments.” The Ecotone: The Journal of Environmental Studies, University of Oregon. (Fall):10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, Bruce. 1993. Early Civilizations: Ancient Egypt in Context. Cairo: The American University in Cairo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, Bruce. 1997. “Forward” In: At a Crossroads: Archaeology and First Peoples in Canada. G. Nicholas and T. Andrews (eds.). Pp. vii-xiii. Burnaby, BC: Archaeology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, Bruce. 2003. Understanding Early Civilizations: A Comparative Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimborn, Hermann. 1949. Señorío y Barbarie en el Valle del Cauca. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Instituto Gonzalo Fernandez de Oviedo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventocilla, Jorge, Valerio Nuñez, Heraclio Herrera, Francisco Herrera, and Mac Chapin. 1996. “The Kuna Indians and Conservation.” In: Traditional Peoples and Biodiversity Conservation in Large Tropical Landscapes. K. Redford and J. Mansour (eds.). Pp. 33–56. Arlington, VA: The Nature Conservancy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, W. 1994. “From Opportunism to Nascent Conservationism.” Human Nature vol. 5(4): 307–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Eric. 2009. “Savage Disobedience.” Orion Magazine, November/December issue. http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/5101/. Accessed March 26, 2010.

  • Walker, Peter. 1999. “Makah Whaling is also a Political Issue.” The Ecotone: The Journal of Environmental Studies, University of Oregon. (Fall):8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, David. 2002. The Fall of the Ancient Maya. London: Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, D. 1983. “Fertility and Pacification Among the Mekranoti of Brazil.” Human Ecology vol. 11(2):227–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildcat, Daniel. 2009. Red Alert! Saving the Planet with Indigenous Knowledge. Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Leslie 1942. The Pueblo of Santa Ana, New Mexico. Menasha: Memoirs of the American Anthropological Association 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. 1995. “Are You an Environmentalist or do You Work for a Living?” In: Uncommon Ground: Toward Reinventing Nature. W. Cronon (ed.). New York: Norton and Company. Pp. 171–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, David. 1998a. “Finding Rain in the Desert: Landscape, Gender, and Far Western North American Rock Art.” In: The Archaeology of Rock Art. C. Chippendale and P. Tacom (eds.). Pp. 11–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, David. 1998b. “History and Prehistory of the Coso Range: The Native American Past on the Western Edge of the Great Basin.” In: Coso Rock Art: A New Perspective. E. Younkin 9ed.). Pp. 29–68. Ridgecrest. Maturango Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willer, David, Richard Chacon and Yamilette Chacon. 2009. “When Can Leaders Act Like Rulers? Models to Answer Questions About Chiefdomship and the Rise of the State.” Department of Sociology Lecture Series, Stockholm University. May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, David. 1999. Indigenous South Americans of the Past and Present. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Eric 1982. Europe and the People Without History. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, William. 2004. “Population Nucleation, Intensive Agriculture, and Environmental Degradation: The Cahokia Example.” Agriculture and Human Values vol. 21:255–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Lori E., and Christine D. White. 1987. Human Biology in the Classic Maya Collapse: Evidence from Paleopathology and Paleodiet. Journal of World Prehistory 10(2): 147–198.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard J. Chacon Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chacon, R.J., Mendoza, R.G. (2012). Discussion and Conclusions. In: Chacon, R., Mendoza, R. (eds) The Ethics of Anthropology and Amerindian Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1065-2_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics