Skip to main content

Improved Time Series Prediction and Symbolic Regression with Affine Arithmetic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Genetic Programming Theory and Practice IX

Abstract

We show how affine arithmetic can be used to improve both the performance and the robustness of genetic programming for problems such as symbolic regression and time series prediction. Affine arithmetic is used to estimate conservative bounds on the output range of expressions during evolution, which allows us to discard trees with potentially infinite bounds, as well as those whose output range lies outside the desired range implied by the training dataset. Benchmark experiments are performed on 15 symbolic regression problems as well as 2 wellknown time series problems. Comparison with a baseline genetic programming system shows a reduced number of fitness evaluations during training and improved generalization on test data, completely eliminating extreme errors. We also apply this technique to the problem of forecasting wind speed on a real world dataset, and the use of affine arithmetic compares favorably with baseline genetic programming, feedforward neural networks and support vector machines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Comba, J. andStolfi, J. (1993).Affine arithmetic and its applications to computer graphics. In Anais do VI SIBGRAPI.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Figueiredo, L. H. and Stolfi, J. (1997). Self-Validated Numerical Methods and Applications. Brazilian Mathematics Colloquium monographs. IMPA, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Figueiredo, L. H. and Stolfi, J. (2004). Affine arithmetic: Concepts and applications. Numerical Algoritms, 37:147–158.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, L. and Mackey, M. (2010). Mackey-glass equation. Scholarpedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Mark, Frank, Eibe, Holmes, Geoffrey, Pfahringer, Bernhard, Reutemann, Peter, and Witten, Ian H. (2009). The weka data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 11:10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keijzer, Maarten (2003). Improving symbolic regression with interval arithmetic and linear scaling. In Ryan, Conor et al., editors, Genetic Programming, Proceedings of EuroGP’2003, volume 2610 of LNCS, pages 70–82, Essex. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keijzer, Maarten (2004). Scaled symbolic regression. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 5(3):259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korns, Michael F. (2009). Symbolic regression of conditional target expressions. In Riolo, Rick L., O’Reilly, Una-May, and McConaghy, Trent, editors, Genetic Programming Theory and Practice VII, Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, chapter 13, pages 211–228. Springer, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotanchek,Mark, Smits,Guido, and Vladislavleva, Ekaterina (2007). Trustable symbolic regression models: using ensembles, interval arithmetic and pareto fronts to develop robust and trust-aware models. In Riolo, Rick L., Soule, Terence, and Worzel, Bill, editors, Genetic Programming Theory and Practice V, Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, chapter 12, pages 201–220. Springer, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koza, John R. (1992). Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdon, W. B. and Poli, Riccardo (2002). Foundations of Genetic Programming. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei, Ma, Shiyan, Luan, Chuanwen, Jiang, Hongling, Liu, and Yan, Zhang (2009). A review on the forecasting of wind speed and generated power. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(4):915 – 920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Looks, M. (2010). PLOP: Probabilistic learning of programs. http://code. google.com/p/plop.

  • Messine, F. (2002). Extentions of affine arithmetic: Application to unconstrained global optimization. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 8(11):992–1015.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Michiorri, A. and Taylor, P.C. (2009). Forecasting real-time ratings for electricity distribution networks using weather forecast data. In 20th International Conference and Exhibition on Electricity Distribution (CIRED), pages 854– 854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. (1966). Interval Analysis. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennachin, Cassio L., Looks, Moshe, and de Vasconcelos, Joao A. (2010). Robust symbolic regression with affine arithmetic. In Branke, Juergen et al., editors, GECCO’10: Proceedings of the 12th annual conference onGenetic and evolutionary computation, pages 917–924, Portland, Oregon, USA. ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shou, Huahao, Lin, Hongwei, Martin, Ralph, and Wang, Guojin (2003). Modified affine arithmetic is more accurate than centered interval arithmetic or affine arithmetic. In Wilson, Michael J. and Martin, Ralph R., editors, 10th IMA International Conference on theMathematics of Surfaces, volume 2768 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 355–365. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smits, Guido and Kotanchek, Mark (2004). Pareto-front exploitation in symbolic regression. InO’Reilly, Una-May, Yu, Tina, Riolo, Rick L., andWorzel, Bill, editors, Genetic Programming Theory and Practice II, chapter 17, pages 283–299. Springer, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soman, S.S., Zareipour, H.,Malik, O., andMandal, P. (2010). A review of wind power and wind speed forecasting methods with different time horizons. In North American Power Symposium (NAPS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Valigiani, Gregory, Fonlupt, Cyril, and Collet, Pierre (2004). Analysis of GP improvement techniques over the real-world inverse problem of ocean color. In Keijzer, Maarten et al., editors, Genetic Programming 7th European Conference, EuroGP 2004, Proceedings, volume 3003 of LNCS, pages 174–186, Coimbra, Portugal. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigend, A. S., Huberman, B. A., and Rumelhart, D. E. (1992). Predicting sunspots and exchange rateswith connectionist networks. InCasdagli,M. and Eubank, S., editors, Nonlinear Modeling and Forecasting. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pennachin, C., Looks, M., de Vasconcelos, J.A. (2011). Improved Time Series Prediction and Symbolic Regression with Affine Arithmetic. In: Riolo, R., Vladislavleva, E., Moore, J. (eds) Genetic Programming Theory and Practice IX. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1770-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1770-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1769-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1770-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics