Abstract
In this chapter, we take a close look at the principles of risk measurement. We argue that it is natural to quantify the riskiness of a position in monetary units so that the measurement of the risk of a position can be interpreted as the size of buffer capital that should be added to the position to provide a sufficient protection against undesirable outcomes. In the investment problems in Chap. 4, variance was used to quantify the riskiness of a portfolio. However, variance, being just the expected squared deviation from the mean value, does not differentiate between good positive deviations and bad negative deviations and cannot easily be translated into meaningful monetary values unless the future value we consider is close to normally distributed. The risk premium considered in Chap. 5 is more natural than the variance as a summary of the riskiness and potential reward of a position. However, the risk premium is difficult to use effectively to control the risk taking of a financial institution or to determine whether the aggregate position of a company or business unit is acceptable from a risk perspective. In this chapter, we will present measures of risk, including the widely used value-at-risk and expected shortfall, analyze their properties, and evaluate their performance in a large number of examples.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acerbi, C.: Spectral measures of risk: a coherent representation of subjective risk aversion. J. Bank. Finan. 26, 1505–1518 (2002)
Acerbi, C., Tasche, D.: On the coherence of Expected Shortfall. J. Bank. Finan. 26, 1487–1503 (2002)
Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M., Heath, D.: Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finan. 9, 203–228 (1999)
Föllmer, H., Schied, A.: Stochastic Finance: An Introduction in Discrete Time, 3rd edn. de Gruyter, Berlin (2011)
Jorion, P.: Value-at-Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2007)
Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev, S.: Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2, 493–517 (2000)
Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev, S., Zabarankin, M.: Master funds in portfolio analysis with general deviation measures. J. Bank. Finan. 30, 743–778 (2005)
Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev, S., Zabarankin, M.: Generalized deviations in risk analysis. Finan. Stochastics 10, 51–74 (2006)
Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev, S., Zabarankin, M.: Optimality conditions in portfolio analysis with general deviation measures. Math. Program. Ser. B 108, 515–540 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hult, H., Lindskog, F., Hammarlid, O., Rehn, C.J. (2012). Risk Measurement Principles. In: Risk and Portfolio Analysis. Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4103-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4103-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4102-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4103-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)