Skip to main content
  • 3452 Accesses

Abstract

While obstruction of the central airways usually occurs over time, patients so affected often require relief on an urgent or semiurgent basis. Physicians have many tools at their disposal, but none can match the microdebrider for its combination of rapid tissue removal and precision.

The microdebrider is a simple instrument: a spinning blade mounted on a hollow tube coupled to suction. It allows the surgeon to remove tissue in a precise manner, avoiding damage to surrounding structures and limiting the need for thermal modalities. Orthopedic surgeons and otolaryngologists have employed microdebriders for years. Thoracic surgeons and interventional pulmonologists have discovered microdebridement more recently, gaining experience in airway interventions over the last 5 years. Physicians have described its use in managing airway granulation tissue, removing foreign bodies, debriding papillomas, and removing malignant tissue.

As investigators have gained more experience with microdebridement, studies have been completed to compare standard operations in the upper respiratory tract done with microdebridement to more traditional techniques. Microdebridement for airway interventions has grown out of its infancy. Though not without limitations, it is a very useful modality for physicians well versed in suspension laryngoscopy and rigid bronchoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Suggested Reading

  1. Mirante J, Christmas D, Yanagisawa E. History and development of powered instrumentation in otolaryngology, head, and neck surgery. In: Yanagisawa E, Christmas D, Mirante J, editors. Powered Instrumentation in otolaryngology, head, and neck surgery. 1st ed. San Diego: Singular; 2002. p. 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Simoni P, Peters GE, Magnuson JS, et al. Use of the endoscopic microdebrider in the management of airway obstruction from laryngotracheal carcinoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003;112(1):11–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lunn W, Garland R, Ashiku S, et al. Microdebrider bronchoscopy: a new tool for the interventional bronchoscopist. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:1485–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wahidi M, Herth F, Ernst A. State of the art: interventional pulmonology. Chest. 2007;131(1):261–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kennedy M, Morice R, Jimenez C, et al. Treatment of bronchial airway obstruction using a rotating tip microdebrider: a case report. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;2:16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lunn W, Bagherzadegan N, Munjampalli S, et al. Initial experience with a rotating airway microdebrider. J Bronchol. 2008;15(2):91–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nuyens M, Zbären P, Seifert E. Endoscopic resection of laryngeal and tracheal lesions using the microdebrider. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(1):162–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guerrero J, Majid A, Ernst A. Cardiogenic shock secondary to tako-tsubo syndrome after debridement of malignant endobronchial obstruction. Chest. 2009;135(1):217–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Holler T, Allegro J, Chadha N, et al. Voice outcomes following repeated surgical resection of laryngeal papillomata in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;141(4):522–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson Y, Merer D, Moscatello A. Comparison of three common tonsillectomy techniques: a prospective randomized, double-blinded clinical study. Acta Otolaryngol. 2006;126(4):402–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gallagher T, Wilcox L, McGuire E, et al. Analyzing factors associated with major complications after adenotonsillectomy in 4776 patients: comparing three tonsillectomy techniques. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;142(6):886–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee D, Kim E. Microdebrider-assisted versus laser-assisted turbinate reduction: comparison of improvement in nasal airway according to type of turbinate hypertrophy. Ear Nose Throat J. 2010;89(11):541–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cingi C, Ure B, Cakli H, et al. Microdebrider-assisted versus radiofrequency-assisted inferior turbinoplasty: a prospective study with objective and subjective outcome measures. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2010;30(3):138–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Lunn M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lunn, W. (2013). Microdement. In: Ernst, A., Herth, F. (eds) Principles and Practice of Interventional Pulmonology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4292-9_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4292-9_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4291-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4292-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics