Abstract
As argued in Chap. 2, policy processes are multi-faceted and may display a wide variety of characteristics. Consequently, policy analysis in a multi-actor context needs to be contingent, multi-faceted, and pluriform. The concluding section of Chap. 2 articulated a wide array of requirements for good policy analysis. Chapter 3 outlined a conceptualization of the variety of different activities and associated purposes policy analysts may engage in. Which of these are most appropriate and which less so depends on the characteristics of the situation and on the ambitions of the client and of the analyst. Both chapters set the scene for the question: Given a specific policy situation, what requirements and type(s) of policy analytic activities are essential for achieving the purposes of client and analyst? In other words, how can an analyst make a reasoned design of his/her interventions? This will be the subject of Chap. 5.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Sometimes there is no clear diagnosis in medical practice, but only a suspicion about the illness to be cured, and either no treatment or a tentative treatment is chosen, to explore its effects and perhaps adapt treatment after some time. Analogous situations occur in policy processes as well.
- 2.
A factor is an attribute of an entity (a thing, a person, a process) for which a value can be established on a scale via direct or indirect measurement.
- 3.
Different systems traditions have developed different conventions regarding where to put the different types of influences in the visualization. In control systems engineering, the controls are put entering from the left side; while in the field of information systems, the controls are generally put on top, entering from above [like in the Structured Analysis and Design Technique (Marca and McGowan 1988)]. We will use the latter convention.
References
Ackoff RL (1974) Redesigning the future: a systems approach to societal problems. Wiley, New York
Bots PWG, van Twist MJW, van Duin JHR (2000) Automatic pattern detection in stakeholder networks. In: Nunamaker JF, Sprague RH (eds) Proceedings HICSS-33. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos. See also http://dana.actoranalysis.com for examples
Bryson JM (2004) What to do when stakeholders matter. Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Manag Rev 6(1):21–53
Coleman JS (1990) Foundations of social theory. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge
de Bruijn JA, Porter AL (2004) The education of a technology policy analyst to process management. Technol Anal Strategic Management 16(2):261–274
Douglas M, Wildavsky A (1982) Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. University of California Press, Berkeley
Dunn W (1994) Public policy analysis: an introduction, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Eden C (1989) Using cognitive mapping for strategic options development and analysis (SODA). In: Rosenhead J (ed) Rational analysis for a problematic world: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. Wiley, Chichester
Enserink B, Hermans L, Kwakkel J, Thissen W, Koppenjan J, Bots P (2010) Policy analysis of multi-actor systems. Lemma, The Hague
Gregory R, Keeney RL (1994) Creating policy alternatives using stakeholder values. Manage Sci 40(8):1035–1048
Hermans LM (2005) Actor analysis for water resources management. Putting the promise into practice. Eburon Publishers, Delft
Hermans L, Thissen W (2009) Actor analysis methods and their use for public policy analysts. Eur J Oper Res 196(2):808–818
Hillestad R, Walker WE, Carrillo M, Bolten JG, Twaalfhoven PGJ, van de Riet O (1996) FORWARD–Freight options for road, water, and rail for the Dutch: final report, MR-736-EAC/VW, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA
Hisschemöller M, Hoppe R (1995) Coping with intractable controversies: the case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis. Knowl Policy Int J Knowl Transfer Utilization 8(4):40–60
Hofstede G (1984) Culture’s consequences. Sage Publications, Newbury Park
Hofstede GH, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M (2010) Cultures and organisations: software for the mind. McGraw-Hill, New York
Keeney RL (1992) Value-focused thinking a path to creative decision making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Keeney RL, Gregory RS (2005) Selecting attributes to measure the achievement of objectives. Oper Res 53:1–11
Lawrence DP (2007) Impact significance determination—designing an approach. Environ Impact Assess Rev 27(8):730–754
Marca D, McGowan C (1988) SADT: structured analysis and design technique. McGraw Hill Book Co., Inc., New York
Mayer I (1997) Debating technologies. A methodological contribution to the design and evaluation of participatory policy analysis. Tilburg University Press, Tilburg
McKeown B, Thomas D (1988) Q-methodology. Series: quantitative applications in the social sciences, Number 07-066. SAGE Publications, Newbury Park, CA
Michalko M (2001) Cracking creativity: the secrets of creative genius. Ten Speed Press, Berkeley
Miser H, Quade E (eds) (1985) Handbook of systems analysis: overview of use, procedures, applications, and practice. Wiley, Chichester
Mitroff I (1983) Stakeholders of the organzational mind. Toward a new view of organizational policy making. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Quade ES (1989) Analysis for public decisions, 3rd edn. Elsevier Science Publishers, New York
RAND Europe (1997) A policy analysis of civil aviation infrastructure options in the Netherlands, DRU-1512-VW/VROM/EZ. The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA
Rommetvedt H (2006) The multiple logics of decision-making. Eur Polit Sci 5:193–208
Sabatier PA (1988) An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sci 21(2):129–168
Sabatier P, Jenkins-Smith HC (1993) Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. Westview Press, Boulder
Sage AP, Armstrong JE Jr (2000) Introduction to systems engineering. Wiley, New York
Timmermans JS (2004) Purposive interaction in multi-actor decision making. Eburon Publishers, Delft
Toulmin SE (1958) The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
van der Heijden K (1996) Scenarios: the art of strategic conversation. Wiley, Chichester
van der Lei T, Enserink B, Thissen W, Bekebrede G (2011) How to use a systems diagram to analyse and structure complex problems for policy issue papers. J Oper Res Soc 62(7):1391–1402
van Eeten MJG (2001) Recasting intractable policy issues: the wider implications of the Netherlands civil aviation controversy. J Policy Anal Manag 20(3):391–414
Walker WE (1988) Chapter 6: Generating and screening alternatives. In Miser HJ, Quade ES (eds) Handbook of systems analysis: craft issues and procedural choices. North-Holland, New York
Walker WE (2000) Policy analysis: a systematic approach to supporting policymaking in the public sector. J Multicriteria Decis Anal 9(1–3):11–27
Weible CM, Sabatier PA (2006) A guide to the advocacy coalition framework. In: Fisher F, Miller G, Sidney M (eds) Handbook of public policy analysis. Theory politics and methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 123–136
Wildavsky A (1979) Speaking truth to power: the art and craft of policy analysis. Little Brown and Company, Boston
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thissen, W.A.H. (2013). Diagnosing Policy Problem Situations. In: Thissen, W., Walker, W. (eds) Public Policy Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 179. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4602-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4602-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4601-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4602-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)