Abstract
This chapter reviews the issues involved in assessing skills in American Sign Language (ASL) and discusses recent attempts to develop standardized measures of ASL skills. The authors discuss the differences between spoken and signed languages and the problems associated with adapting language assessments designed for spoken languages. The challenges and issues associated with developing new assessments specifically designed for the assessment of ASL are addressed, as are potential approaches to this process. Advantages and disadvantages of each of these approaches are discussed, and recently developed measures of ASL skills using each of these approaches are presented. The authors discuss the need for ASL standards to which skills could be compared and which could provide benchmarks to guide the development ASL curricula. Finally, authors address the need for educational curricula in ASL and the fact that standards, assessment, and curricula are interrelated concerns.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen, T. E., Hwang, Y., & Stansky, A. (2009). Measuring factors that predict deaf students’ reading abilities: The VL2 Toolkit-Project design and early findings. Paper presented at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the Association of College Educators of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, New Orleans.
Anderson, D., & Reilly, J. (2002). The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory: Normative data for American Sign Language. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7(2), 83–106.
Ashton, G., Cagle, K., Kurz, K., Newell, W., Peterson, R., & Zinza, J. (2012). Standards for Learning American Sign Language (ASL) in the 21st century. In Standards for Foreign Language Learning in the 21st century. Yonkers, NY: National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project.
Caccamise, F., Newell, W., Fennell, D., & Carr, N. (1988). The Georgia and New York State Programs for assessing and developing sign communication skills of vocational rehabilitation personnel. Journal of the American Deafness and Rehabilitation Association, 21, 1–14.
Caccamise, F., Newell, W., & Mitchell-Caccamise, M. (1983). Use of the Sign Language Proficiency Interview for assessing the sign communicative competence of Louisiana School for the Deaf dormitory counselor applicants. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 16, 283–230.
Corina, D. P., Lawyer, L., Hirshorn, E., & Hauser, P. C. (2011, April). Functional neuroanatomy of skilled and non-skilled deaf readers: Data from implicit word recognition.
Dudis, P. (2004). Depiction of events in ASL. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley
Dudis, P. (2008). Types of depiction in ASL. In R. M. de Quadros (Ed.), Sign Language: Spinning and unraveling the past, present and future (pp. 159–190). Florianópolis, SC, Brazil: Editora Arara Azul. http://www.editora-arara-azul.com.br/Livros.php.
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Examiner’s manual for the PPVT-III: Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Emmorey, K. (2002). Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Enns, C. J., & Herman, R. C. (2011). Adapting the assessing British Sign Language Development: Receptive skills test into American Sign Language. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(3), 362–374.
Freidenberg, L. (1995). Psychological testing: Design, analysis, and use. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Hammill, D., Brown, V., Larsen, S., & Wiederholt, J. L. (1994). Test of adolescent and adult language (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED, Inc.
Haug, T. (2005). Review of sign language assessment instruments. Sign Language & Linguistics, 8, 59–96.
Haug, T. (2008). Review of signed language assessment instruments. In A. E. Baker & B. Woll (Eds.), Sign language acquisition (pp. 51–86). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishers.
Haug, T. (2011). Approaching sign language test construction: Adaptation of the German Sign Language Receptive Skills Test. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16, 343–361.
Haug, T., & Mann, W. (2008). Adapting tests of sign language assessment for other sign languages—A review of linguistic, cultural, and psychometric problems. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 13, 138–147.
Hauser, P. C., Paludneviciene, R., Dudis, P., Riddle, W., Daggett, D., & Freel, B. (2010, September). The Depiction Comprehension Test in American Sign Language.
Hauser, P. C., Paludnevičiene, R., Supalla, T., & Bavelier, D. (2008). American Sign Language-Sentence Reproduction Test: Development and implications. In R. M. de Quadros (Ed.), Sign Language: Spinning and unraveling the past, present and future (pp. 160–172). Petropolis, Brazil: Editora Arara Azul.
Herman, R., Holmes, S., & Woll, B. (1999). Assessing BSL development—Receptive skills test. Coleford, UK: The Forest Bookshop.
Hoffmeister, R., Bahan, B., Greenwald, J., & Cole, J. (1990). American Sign Language Assessment Instrument (ASLAI). Unpublished test, Center for the Study of Communication and the Deaf, Boston University.
Knight, D. (1983). Comment on Newell et al. Adaption of the Language Proficiency Interview (LPI) for assessing sign communicative competence. Sign Language Studies, 41, 311–352.
Kubus, O., Rathmann, C., Morford, J. P., & Wilkinson, E. (2010, September). Effects and non-effects of sign language knowledge on word recognition: A comparison of ASL-English and DGS-German bilingual adults. Paper presented at the 10th Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research Conference, West Lafayette, IN.
Kurz, K., & Taylor, M. (2008). Learning outcomes for American Sign Language levels 1–4. Raleigh, NC: Lulu Publishing Company. www.lulu.com.
Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Volume 2: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Liddell, S. K. (2003). Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Liskin-Gasparro, J. (1982). ETS oral proficiency test manual. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Lucas, C., & Valli, C. (1992). Language contact in the American Deaf Community. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Lucas, C., Valli, C., & Mulrooney, K. J. (2005). Linguistics of American Sign Language: An introduction. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Maller, S. J., Singleton, J. L., Supalla, S. J., & Wix, T. (1999). The development and psychometric properties of the American Sign Language Proficiency Assessment (ASL-PA). Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 4, 259–269.
Morford, J. P., Wilkinson, E., Vilwock, A., Piñar, P., & Kroll, J. F. (2011). When deaf signers read English: Do written words activate their sign translations? Cognition, 118, 286–292.
Mounty, J. (1993). Signed language development checklist—Training manual. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Mounty, J. (1994). Signed language development checklist. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Newell, W., Caccamise, F., Boardman, K., & Holcomb, B. R. (1983). Adaption of the Language Proficiency Interview (LPI) for assessing sign communicative competence. Sign Language Studies, 41, 311–352.
Newman, A.J., Waligura, D.L., Neville, H.J., & Ullman, M. T. (2003). Effects of late second language acquisition on neural organization: Event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence. Cognitive Neuroscience Society Abstracts, 11.
Newport, E. L. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14, 11–28.
Prinz, P., Strong, M. & Kuntze, M. (1994). The Test of ASL. Unpublished test. San Francisco: San Francisco State University, California Research Institute.
Schick, B. (1997). American Sign Language Vocabulary Test. Unpublished test, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Singleton, J., & Supalla, S. (2011). Assessing children’s proficiency in natural signed languages. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language and education (2nd ed., pp. 306–319). New York: Oxford University Press.
Stokoe, W. C. (1960). Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication system of the American deaf. In Studies in linguistics: Occasional papers (No. 8). Department of Anthropology and Linguistics, University of Buffalo: Buffalo, NY.
Supalla, T., Newport, E., Singleton, J., Supalla, S., Coulter, G., & Metlay, D. (1995). An overview of the Test Battery for American Sign Language morphology and syntax. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), April 20, 1995, San Francisco, CA.
Tomlinson, C. A., & McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating differentiated instruction and understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge Paul Dudis for his contributions to this chapter. This project was partially supported by the Gallaudet University Priority Grant to RP and PH, NSF Science of Learning Center grant # SBE-0541953 to PH and RP and NIH/NIDCD grant # RO1 DC004418-06A1 to PH. Special thanks to the assistants at the Deaf Studies Laboratory at the National Technical Institute for the Deaf at Rochester Institute of Technology for help with the preparation of this chapter
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paludneviciene, R., Hauser, P.C., Daggett, D.J., Kurz, K.B. (2012). Issues and Trends in Sign Language Assessment. In: Morere, D., Allen, T. (eds) Assessing Literacy in Deaf Individuals. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5269-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5269-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5268-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5269-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)