Skip to main content

What About the Women? Transitional Justice and Gender in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Northern Ireland

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transitional Justice and Civil Society in the Balkans

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Transitional Justice ((SSTJ))

Abstract

In 2004, the United Nations Secretary-General submitted a report to the Security Council concerning the rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies. In his report Kofi Annan stated that “it is imperative that both the Security Council and the United Nations system carefully consider the particular rule of law and justice needs in each host country”. This “imperative” included “the situation and role of women”. Despite that call from the Secretary-General there is evidence that rather than the situation and role of women being considered in post-conflict societies, that role has actually taken a regressive step. A desire to return to a state of pre-conflict “normality” has impinged negatively on the needs and place of women. It has been noted that periods of violent conflict may alter traditional gender roles within societies with violence (and the seeming preoccupation of men by that violence) by offering women increased opportunities to have a greater say in decision-making processes. This is especially prevalent in the domestic sphere. Peace and the cessation of violence, however, seem to reverse these trends with a compulsion to return to the homeostasis that existed prior to the outbreak of violence. This means that women, who may have been marginalised prior to the outbreak of violence, return to that state of marginalisation despite the possibilities of transformation in a post-conflict society. In this chapter, the authors examine the place of women in two post-conflict societies—Bosnia and Herzegovina and Northern Ireland. They will use the critical lens of transitional justice and research carried out in the two regions to bring clarity as to the factors behind the continued disempowerment of women in rebuilding a society emerging from a violent past.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The numbers of people killed in BiH have remained a matter of dispute. These figures are taken from the Bosanska Knjiga Mrtvih, a project by the Research and Documentation Centre in Sarajevo.

References

  • Aiken, N. 2010. Learning to live together: Transitional justice and intergroup reconciliation in Northern Ireland. International Journal of Transitional Justice 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, H. 1993. Peace as a women’s issue: A history of the us movement for world peace and women’s rights. New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, C., and C. Bacchi. 2000. Citizen bodies: Embodying citizens - a feminist analysis. International Feminist Journal of Politics 2(3): 337–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C., C. Campbell, and F. Ní Aoláin. 2004. Justice discourses in transition. Social and Legal Studies 13(3): 305–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C., and C. O’Rourke. 2007. Does feminism need a theory of transitional justice? International Journal of Transitional Justice 1: 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belloni, R. 2001. Civil society and peacebuilding in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Peace Research 38(2): 163–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benderley, J. 1997. Rape, feminism and nationalism in the war in the Yugoslav successor states. In Feminist nationalism, ed. L. West, 59–74 New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, D. 1997. Peacemaking strategies in Northern Ireland: Building complementarity in conflict management. Houndmills: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeschoten, R. 2003. The trauma of war rape: A comparative view on the Bosnian conflict and the Greek Civil War. History and Anthropology. 14(1): 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock-Utne, B. 1989. Educating for peace: A feminist perspective. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherifati-Merabtine, D. 1994. Algeria at a crossroads: National liberation, Islamicisation and women. In Gender and national identity: Women and politics in Muslim societies, ed. V. Moghadam, 40–62 London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, C. 2010. Gender relations as causal in militarization and war. International Feminist Journal of Politics 12(2): 139–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couillard, V. 2007. The Nairobi Declaration: Redefining reparations for women victims of sexual violence. The International Journal of Transitional Justice 1: 444–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draculić, S. 1993. Women and the New Democracy in the Former Yugoslavia. In Gender, politics and post-communism: Nationalism, war and the great powers, ed. N. Funk and M. Mueller, 123–130 London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, C., Bailey, C., and Guillerot, J. 2008. Reparations for sexual and reproductive violence: Prospects for achieving gender justice in Guatemala and Peru. The International Journal of Transitional Justice 2: 192–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzduff, M. 1999. Changing history—Peace building in northern Ireland. In European Centre for Conflict Prevention, People building peace: 35 Inspiring stories from around the world, 87–103 Utrecht: ECCP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, C. 2000. Bananas, beaches and bases: Making feminist sense of international politics. Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, K. 1999. Women’s work: The story of the Northern Ireland women’s coalition. Belfast: Blackstaff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. 1996. Peace by peaceful means: Peace, conflict development and civilisation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenny, M. 1999. The Balkans 1804–1999. London: Granta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms, E. 2003. Women as agents of ethnic reconciliation? Women’s NGOs and international intervention in postwar Bosnia-Herzegovina. Women’s Studies International Forum 26(1): 15–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrooke, R. 1999. To end a war. New York: Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, D. 2001. Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M. 2008. Armed conflict, international linkages and women’s parliamentary representation in developing nations. Social Problems 56(1): 174–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, G. 1997. Feminism and Nationalism: The European Case. In Feminism and nationalism, ed. L. West, 3–40 New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karam, A. 2001. Women in war and peacebuilding. International Feminist Journal of Politics 3(1): 2–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, R., and E. Mobekk. 2007. Seeking accountability after war. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K. (ed.). 1997. Rebuilding societies after civil war: Critical roles for international assistance. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederach, J.P. 1999. Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington DC: US Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. 1975. The Northern Ireland problem: Cases, theories and solutions. British Journal of Political Science 5(1): 83–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. 1977. Democracy in plural societies: A comparative exploration. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundy, P., and McGovern, M. 2008. Whose justice? Rethinking transitional justice from the bottom up. Journal of Law and Society 35(2): 265–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majstorović, D. 2011. Femininity, patriarchy and resistance in postwar Bosnia and Herzegovina. International Review of Sociology 21(2): 277–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, C. 2002. Conflict management and elite habituation in postwar democracy. Comparative Politics 35(1): 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrattan, C. 2010. Explaining Northern Ireland? The limitations of the ethnic conflict model. National Identities12(2): 181–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R., R. Wilford, and F. Donoghue. 1996. Women and political participation in Northern Ireland. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, G. 1999. Making peace. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, P., Evans, G., and O’Leary, B. 2009. Extremist outbidding in ethnic party systems is not inevitable: Tribune parties in Northern Ireland. Political Studies (57): 397–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghadam, V. 1994. Gender and national identity: Women and politics in Muslim societies. London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, C., and F. Clark (eds.). 2001. Victims, perpetrators or actors? Gender, armed conflict and political violence. London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mujkić, A., and Hulsey, J. 2010. Explaining the success of nationalist parties in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Politićka Misao 47(2): 143–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ní Aoláin, F. 2009. Women, security, and the patriarchy of internationalized transitional justice. Human Rights Quarterly 31(4): 1055–1085.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ní Aoláin, F., and Rooney, E. 2007. Underenforcement and intersectionality: Gendered aspects of transition for women. International Journal of Transitional Justice 1: 338–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, B. 1999. The nature of the agreement. Fordham International Law Review 22(4): 1628–1667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterveld, V. 2008. The special court for Sierra Leone’s consideration of gender-based violence: Contributing to transitional justice. Human Rights Review 10: 73–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popović, D. 2009. Transitional justice guidebook for Bosnia and Herzegovina: Executive summary. Sarajevo: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, A. 2008. Women, gender and peacemaking in civil wars. In Contemporary peacemaking: Conflict, peace processes and post-war reconstruction, ed. John Darby and Roger MacGinty, 105–119 Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, M. 2004. In their own words: A research report into the victims sector in Northern Ireland. Belfast: Training for Women Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, M. 2008. Women, civil society and peacebuilding. In Global change, civil society and the Northern Ireland peace process, ed. C. Farrington. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pupavać, V. 2005. Empowering women? An assessment of international gender policies in Bosnia. International Peacekeeping 12(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Racioppi, L. and O’Sullivan See, K. 2001. “This we will maintain”: gender, ethno-nationalism and the politics of unionism in Northern Ireland. Nations and Nationalism 7(1): 93–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, B. 1993. Women and peace: Feminist visions of global society. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, C., and Duckett, L. 2007. Mothering during war and Postwar Bosnia. Journal of Family Nursing 13(4): 461–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeder, P., and D. Rothchild. 2005. Sustainable peace: Power and democracy after civil wars. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roht-Arriaza, N. 2006. The new landscape of transitional justice. In Transitional justice in the justice-first century: Beyond truth and justice, ed. N. Roht-Arriaza and J. Mariezcurrena, 1–16 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney, E. 2006. Women’s equality in Northern Ireland’s transition: Intersectionality in theory and place. Feminist Legal Studies (14): 353–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooney, E. 2007. Engendering transitional justice: Questions of absence and silence. International Journal of Law in Context 3(2): 173–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, J. 1981. Ethnopolitics: A conceptual framework. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddick, S. 1990. Maternal thinking: Towards a politics of peace. London: Women’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R., and L. Waldorff (eds.). 2010. Localising transitional justice: Intervention and priorities after mass violence. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, C. 2007. Women’s work and the growth of civil society in post-War Bosnia. Nationalities Papers 35(1): 171–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skjelsbaek, I., and D. Smith (eds.). 2001. Gender, peace and conflict. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skjelsbaek, I. 2009. Perceptions of ‘good womanhood’ among twenty Bosnian focus group participants. International Feminist Journal of Politics 11(3): 392–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1999. Myths and memories of the nation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J. 2000. From voting to violence: Democratisation and nationalist conflict. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. 2001. Northern Ireland: Consociation or social transformation? In Northern Ireland and The Northern Ireland conflict and the Good Friday Agreement in comparative perspective, ed. J. McGarry, 36–52 Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermann, C. 2000. Muslim Women and Nationalism: The power of the image. Current Sociology 48(4): 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Security Council. 2004. The rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Women, U.N. 2011. Progress of the world’s women 2011–2012: In pursuit of justice. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voutat, B. 2000. Territorial identity in Europe: The political processes of the construction of identities in Corsica, the Basque country, Italy, Macedonia and the Swiss Jura. Contemporary European History 9(2): 285–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. 2010. The Northern Ireland experience of conflict and agreement: A model for export? Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, M. 1997. Gender and nation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to NI-CO in Belfast, which funded the research in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the EU Building Sustainable Prosperity programme in Northern Ireland, under which the research in Northern Ireland was funded. Much gratitude is also owed to all those who took part in interviews and focus groups for the purposes of the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Potter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Potter, M., Abernethy, H. (2013). What About the Women? Transitional Justice and Gender in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Northern Ireland. In: Simić, O., Volčič, Z. (eds) Transitional Justice and Civil Society in the Balkans. Springer Series in Transitional Justice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5422-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics